We argue the point. Women argue the person. All (((They))) have done is change from arguing the person by insult or shame to arguing the person by pseudoscientific insult or shame (psychologizing).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:21:00 UTC
Form: Aphorism
-
We invented truth and the immediate resolution of differences – the male strateg
We invented truth and the immediate resolution of differences – the male strategy of the strong. (((They))) invented lying and incremental undermining – the female strategy of the weak.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:13:00 UTC
-
Men who seek saviors neither obtain nor deserve them. It’s those who take up arm
Men who seek saviors neither obtain nor deserve them. It’s those who take up arms and remove all need that are saved – by themselves.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-14 16:54:00 UTC
-
The Cult of Sovereignty (natural Law)
It’s better to belong to a cult of truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, and markets in everything, than (a) to be wrong, (b) to be a sophist (c) be dedicated to any OTHER cult. Western law is a cult. hence why Americans treat the constitution (of natural law) as sacred. They just couldn’t defend it as such. The law is a cult, and that is its virtue. I’m thoroughly thrilled to institutionalize that cult. You think calling natural law fundamentalism a cult is an insult? It’s a recognition of SUCCESS. (a) a moral license for violence… (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition (d) a threat of sufficient concern that the other parties acquiesce. But better – a scientific religion of intergenerational transmission.
-
The Cult of Sovereignty (natural Law)
It’s better to belong to a cult of truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, and markets in everything, than (a) to be wrong, (b) to be a sophist (c) be dedicated to any OTHER cult. Western law is a cult. hence why Americans treat the constitution (of natural law) as sacred. They just couldn’t defend it as such. The law is a cult, and that is its virtue. I’m thoroughly thrilled to institutionalize that cult. You think calling natural law fundamentalism a cult is an insult? It’s a recognition of SUCCESS. (a) a moral license for violence… (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition (d) a threat of sufficient concern that the other parties acquiesce. But better – a scientific religion of intergenerational transmission.
-
End the Rents
Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere. To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents. As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents. By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk. Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.
-
End the Rents
Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere. To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents. As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents. By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk. Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.
-
You don’t understand. Sovereignty is decidable. The first cause of western civ i
You don’t understand.
Sovereignty is decidable.
The first cause of western civ is this decidability – a feature that no other has.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-13 23:50:00 UTC
-
One of (((Their))) techniques is to create moral hazard by appeal to reasonablen
One of (((Their))) techniques is to create moral hazard by appeal to reasonableness (optimums) versus appeal to criticism (skepticisms). Whenever someone makes an appeal to reasonableness rather than reciprocity or truth then you know they’re engaging in deception by pilpul.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-12 15:43:00 UTC
-
I think the first difference between my thought and traditional thought, is that
I think the first difference between my thought and traditional thought, is that i treat us as gene machines first, and our rational and verbal minds as negotiators on behalf of those genes – totally unaware that what we consider good and true are merely instructions from those genes telling us what success conditions are.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-10 09:43:00 UTC