Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, the compromise between the genders and classes, the markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, nations.
Reductively, “Parasites.”
“You”
😉
Form: Aphorism
-
Who is “They”?
-
Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergene
Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, the compromise between the genders and classes, the markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, nations.
“You.” 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:16:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174069584036544512
Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174066673499770880
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174066673499770880
-
BTW: intelligence is second to conscientiousness in economic productivity but no
BTW: intelligence is second to conscientiousness in economic productivity but not in economic complexity.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:46:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174061983869689856
Reply addressees: @_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer No but it is the foundation of every surviving civilizational paradigm, calculation, argument, science, and law. Far less than one percent of us matter. In biological terms, the primary function of mosts is to create a division of labor sufficient to produce a few geniuses.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer No but it is the foundation of every surviving civilizational paradigm, calculation, argument, science, and law. Far less than one percent of us matter. In biological terms, the primary function of mosts is to create a division of labor sufficient to produce a few geniuses.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174061758157336577
-
I Think Philosophy is Closed.
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy now only tells us choice, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the epistemic pyramid is not philosophy(rationalism) but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence), mathematics(measurement) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
-
I Think Philosophy is Closed.
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy now only tells us choice, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the epistemic pyramid is not philosophy(rationalism) but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence), mathematics(measurement) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
-
So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the righ
So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the right engages in not telling the truth and moralizing. And in all things – truth rules. Until the right uses truth it cannot defeat the lie-and-deny-pseudoscience and sophism of the left.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:19:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173949614032076800
Reply addressees: @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173949207486652416
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173949207486652416
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173949207486652416
-
In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but
In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument. That said, history proved them right, because of individualism’s destruction of familism, and …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:13:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173947983739654144
Reply addressees: @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
-
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is c
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete.
Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=467274753869420&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 07:03:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173854983051186177
-
Once it’s cold it doesn’t matter how cold it is
Once it’s cold it doesn’t matter how cold it is.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 23:53:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173746774927978498
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173746338208669696
IN REPLY TO:
@FullAccountant
@curtdoolittle Whats the bigger scam the College meme or the Federal Reserve meme?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173746338208669696
-
All language is reducible to analogy to experience and all experience communicab
All language is reducible to analogy to experience and all experience communicable by language marginally indifferent. ie: measurements.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:17:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173707577944870912
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173707173286879237
IN REPLY TO:
@Semiogogue
@curtdoolittle How are words ‘measurements’? Is a poem falsifiable?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173707173286879237