UPDATING ARTHUR C CLARKE
*Any sufficiently intelligent individual will be indistinguishable from an artificial intelligence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 20:57:00 UTC
UPDATING ARTHUR C CLARKE
*Any sufficiently intelligent individual will be indistinguishable from an artificial intelligence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 20:57:00 UTC
RT @curtdoolittle: “In Wars of Genes,
You don’t change hearts;
You stop them from beating.”
(Doolittle’s 42nd Law of War)
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 00:52:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174848852211445765
Optimism in ignorance.
Confidence in knowledge.
What is optimism to you in ignorance.
Is confidence to me in knowledge.
Men who know violence do not fear it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 21:38:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174799875571142656
Reply addressees: @Fugggg18
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174799696843419649
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Fugggg18 Liberals act in analog. Conservatives act in binary.
The problem is the conservative threshold is very high.
That said, do not claim your cowardice, fear of uncertainty or unwillingness to follow as wisdom or bravery. It’s cowardice not pessimism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174799696843419649
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Fugggg18 Liberals act in analog. Conservatives act in binary.
The problem is the conservative threshold is very high.
That said, do not claim your cowardice, fear of uncertainty or unwillingness to follow as wisdom or bravery. It’s cowardice not pessimism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174799696843419649
Liberals act in analog. Conservatives act in binary.
The problem is the conservative threshold is very high.
That said, do not claim your cowardice, fear of uncertainty or unwillingness to follow as wisdom or bravery. It’s cowardice not pessimism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 21:37:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174799696843419649
Reply addressees: @Fugggg18
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174799469277319168
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Fugggg18 I think that’s a contradiction in terms.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174799469277319168
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Fugggg18 I think that’s a contradiction in terms.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174799469277319168
Internal consistency of words and ideas is not a problem for The Herd – only internal consistency of following the herd, and it’s advocacy of dysgenia (equality). All seemingly undecidable political questions are so by tests of either reciprocity or dysgenics. Why? Inequality.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 21:33:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174798681704452103
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174794782390046722
IN REPLY TO:
@StefanMolyneux
The massive burden of being a secret racist while calling everyone ELSE a racist would really trouble someone who actually had a conscience.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174794782390046722
The Liberal (feminine) mind overestimates its abilities because social cognitive bias, and insensitivity to non-correspondence. The Conservative (masculine) mind underestimates its ability because of lack of social cognitive bias, and hypersensitivity to non-correspondence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 18:42:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174755569888088065
Reply addressees: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Again. If I asked you for a plan for taking over a foreign country, a political party, a religion, a political movement, a major corporation, a minor one, or a local business, by use of information and incentives alone, could you? I do. Do not measure others by your reflection.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174754775797293056
RT @ThruTheHayes: Critique is just fancy lying.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 17:12:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174732987604328448
Revolution, Restoration, Reformation, Restitution.
Never has an empire been so fragile, a people so motivated, and the means so available.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 16:03:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174715553128361986
Reply addressees: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174713067034370048
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174713067034370048
This next election, if it occurs, will be the last.
I’m committed to it.
And at least 1M others are.
And that’s all it takes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 15:47:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174711704254590976
Reply addressees: @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174709891635666950
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174709891635666950
Blackmail is the test case for limits of claims of voluntary exchange.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 23:31:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174465975112085505
Reply addressees: @KralcTrebor @Darren_B_Lane @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174461144972582915
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174461144972582915