Mathematics: the study of constant relations.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 10:11:00 UTC
Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science
-
podcast: 7m. My position on climate change)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFCGA-PQVD0(Quick podcast: 7m. My position on climate change)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 18:13:00 UTC
-
I suspect that when we discover the means by which space time is constructed (of
I suspect that when we discover the means by which space time is constructed (of big,heavy somethings), that Einstein will look ‘dumb’ for having distracted us for a century or more, by solving the question of electromagnetic radiation (light) rather than the problem of the construction of the universe. A particularly obvious human cognitive bias in retrospect.
it certainly appears that what we see of the universe in the radiant spectrums consists of little more than the sparklers and we are still ignorant of what it is that casts them off. We live off the sparkles, and we see a world of sparkles, but like the maggot we feast on the waste, not the beast.
I say this not because I know some particular secret about the universe. But because I know a few particular secrets about the mind of man and the consistency of errors he makes. And just how difficult it is to circumvent those errors in each great leap forward.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 08:34:00 UTC
-
HOLD THE NOBEL PRIZE COMMITTEE LIABLE FOR THEIR RATING SERVICE? Do you suppose w
HOLD THE NOBEL PRIZE COMMITTEE LIABLE FOR THEIR RATING SERVICE?
Do you suppose we could make the Nobel Prize committee liable for the certification of pseudoscience? I think we could. Why not? I mean, for all intents and purposes, how is the Nobel Committee any different from the Mortgage Rating Services? Privatizing commons while socializing losses into the commons?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-20 12:38:00 UTC
-
I like his suggestion that dutch is a good language for science (actually engine
I like his suggestion that dutch is a good language for science (actually engineering). I think a lot of us agree. English=Law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 17:28:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799665581502775296
Reply addressees: @Continuatie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799665215772114944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799665215772114944
-
The evolution of life is humorous if you consider most life forms either matter-
The evolution of life is humorous if you consider most life forms either matter-bags in water, or water-bags on land and air. How far can I get from the water, and how big can I get if i can’t just absorb water from condensation?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 08:05:00 UTC
-
all social science appears to be pseudoscience. almost all psychology. much envi
all social science appears to be pseudoscience. almost all psychology. much environmental. Physics, Chemistry, Biology, ok.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 07:55:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797346975368773632
Reply addressees: @CatoInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797346453672828928
IN REPLY TO:
@CatoInstitute
When (if ever) should government fund science? https://t.co/4b8WTkSiah https://t.co/qCYzsJhsOy
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797346453672828928
-
It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But scienc
It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But science is a moral discipline.So if it’s immoral is it scientific?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 02:59:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797272551756103680
-
It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But scienc
It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But science is a moral discipline.So if it’s immoral is it scientific?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:59:00 UTC
-
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARR
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARRANT THE TRUTHFULNESS OF OUR STATEMENTS.
The languges of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances.
That’s what science is:
A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech.
Period. End of story.
I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology.
Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.
Ethelebert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups.
Ok. We’re done here.
“Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.”
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:39:00 UTC