photos_and_videos/ChartsandGraphs_5h6SzI0A0Q/70765642_111602843571211_4715713850073153536_n_111602840237878.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 13:35:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/ChartsandGraphs_5h6SzI0A0Q/70765642_111602843571211_4715713850073153536_n_111602840237878.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 13:35:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/ChartsandGraphs_5h6SzI0A0Q/71021013_111603023571193_9039761038194507776_n_111603020237860.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 13:35:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/ChartsandGraphs_5h6SzI0A0Q/70826422_111604276904401_3695553370883358720_n_111604273571068.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 13:35:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/ChartsandGraphs_5h6SzI0A0Q/70526723_111603433571152_5859130463204933632_n_111603430237819.jpg

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 13:35:00 UTC
In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument. That said, history proved them right, because of individualism’s destruction of familism, and …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:13:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173947983739654144
Reply addressees: @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173947347203756032
19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:37:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue … that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) problem in this paradigm is that it is trying to create a discipline that is just language facility, and discontinuous. 18) There is no limit to set size indexed, only increase in generalization.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue … that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) problem in this paradigm is that it is trying to create a discipline that is just language facility, and discontinuous. 18) There is no limit to set size indexed, only increase in generalization.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
RT @DegenRolf: “Claims about the health dangers of red meat are not only improbable in the light of our evolutionary history, they are far…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-10 00:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1171216651578220545
RT @DegenRolf: “Recent evidence across multiple meta-analyses on key mental disorders provides an overarching picture of limited benefits f…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-10 00:14:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1171215342653325313
No. And it’s unnecessary. The solution to debris is well known and old, encase it in silica (sand) or glass. The glass will decompose at the same rate. & We do not ‘create’ fissionable material. We work very hard to concentrate (refine) it. It’s everywhere in the environment.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-07 17:50:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170393901376704524
Reply addressees: @EvanMcLaren @NoSorcerer @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170360339873091585
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170360339873091585
I understand that there is a lot of pseudoscience running around but the evidence from three mile island, chernobyl and fukushima is that (a) no harm other than tiny increase in thyroid cancer (which I have), (b) nature recovers very rapidly. And (c) The French NE industry works.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-07 14:29:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170343236294119424
Reply addressees: @NoSorcerer @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170340622991052800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1170340622991052800