19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:37:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue … that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) problem in this paradigm is that it is trying to create a discipline that is just language facility, and discontinuous. 18) There is no limit to set size indexed, only increase in generalization.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue … that associate fragments of disambiguated sense-perception into episodes. 17) problem in this paradigm is that it is trying to create a discipline that is just language facility, and discontinuous. 18) There is no limit to set size indexed, only increase in generalization.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173485259243044864
Leave a Reply