Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science

  • BELOW THE QUANTUM (worth repeating) … At present we deduce that a difference i

    BELOW THE QUANTUM

    (worth repeating)

    … At present we deduce that a difference in fundamental charges is producing a subsequent difference in fundamental charge distributions that we call quantum fields, and a distribution of temporary density of that quantum field we call a particle.

    And by repeating this process of a difference in the pattern of charges, particles form combinations we call atoms or elements, elements form chemicals ,chemicals form molecules, molecules that include carbon produce biochemical molecules, biochemical molecules form proteins, proteins produce molecules necessary for cells, cells produce other cells, cells produce organs, organs produce organisms, organisms produce nervous systems, nervous systems produce memories, memories produce predictions, predictions product choices, and there we go.

    The entirety of the ‘grammar’ of the universe is – similar to binary or ternary logic – a difference in charges, whose change we call entropy: the tendency of all charges to equilibrate from order caused by differences in charges, to the disorder – the minimum difference in charges possible. …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:16:00 UTC

  • SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS? I use ‘frothy’ universe, and K

    SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS?

    I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of.

    —“springy’ ‘stringy’ ‘wavey’ all similar descriptions that have been thrown around but none that don’t rely on appeals to analogy, yet.”—John Smith ‘

    i use: the underlying structure of the universe always and everywhere is geometric, and therefore all waves describe the reorganization of geometric first-structure of the universe, as altered as energy moves through it, changing charges, and releasing charges, with what we call atoms, steady states of those charges moving through the underlying geometry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:12:00 UTC

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX As in all things there is no paradox, just an open que

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    As in all things there is no paradox, just an open question, no paradoxes exist.

    One can falsify the fermi question. It is falsifiable.We have failed to falsify it.

    One cannot disprove, only fail to provide a proof of possibility in an axiomatic system like mathematics, and reality is a theoretic system, not axiomatic.

    At present it is falsifiable, un-falsified, and undecidable, and therefore all we can say is that “we don’t know yet”.

    The most obvious reasons are:

    1 – Technological (EMR is a primitive technology)

    2 – Differences are such that we would be of no trading (cooperative) value; interfering would only create a competitor; and it is too early for a colonization effort to have reached us given the recent development of EMR broadcasting.

    3 – Time and distance window of opportunity

    4 – We are in a calm location between arms, in a calm (dying) galaxy, and have had long enough period of growth to ‘bake’ in necessary conditions

    5 – I am concerned that the spinning liquid iron core of our planet that creates its defensive field is rarer than we imagine, and as such it is much harder for life to have time to bake. taken to the extreme, the question may be, now many planets can survive four to five billion years, in a safe rural area of a galaxy, in the habitable (water) zone, while maintaining a spinning liquid iron core?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:57:00 UTC

  • WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY Good science is rarely publicized outsi

    WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY

    Good science is rarely publicized outside of the field,because it requires specialized knowledge to comprehend. Conversely, much of what passes for science that is publicized consists largely of numerology. In other words, we have simply moved from sophisms in scriptural and textual interpretation, to sophisms in numerological form. outside of the hard sciences, almost all of it’s outright fiction or lying – including most economics. There is nothing in this universe that is not expressible in geometric and operational terms. if that explanation isn’t included it’s a lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:32:00 UTC

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX As in all things there is no paradox, just an open que

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    As in all things there is no paradox, just an open question, no paradoxes exist.

    One can falsify the fermi question. It is falsifiable.We have failed to falsify it.

    One cannot disprove, only fail to provide a proof of possibility in an axiomatic system like mathematics, and reality is a theoretic system, not axiomatic.

    At present it is falsifiable, un-falsified, and undecidable, and therefore all we can say is that “we don’t know yet”.

    The most obvious reasons are:

    1 – Technological (EMR is a primitive technology)

    2 – Differences are such that we would be of no trading (cooperative) value; interfering would only create a competitor; and it is too early for a colonization effort to have reached us given the recent development of EMR broadcasting.

    3 – Time and distance window of opportunity

    4 – We are in a calm location between arms, in a calm (dying) galaxy, and have had long enough period of growth to ‘bake’ in necessary conditions

    5 – I am concerned that the spinning liquid iron core of our planet that creates its defensive field is rarer than we imagine, and as such it is much harder for life to have time to bake. taken to the extreme, the question may be, now many planets can survive four to five billion years, in a safe rural area of a galaxy, in the habitable (water) zone, while maintaining a spinning liquid iron core?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 10:36:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daug

    THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY

    —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daughtry

    I know for certain I evolved from a common group of ancestors to the other great apes – yes.

    And,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=495484734381755&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 20:21:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189276085101514753

  • THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daug

    THE ONLY ANSWER NECESSARY

    —“So you think you came from a monkey?”– Jesse Daughtry

    I know for certain I evolved from a common group of ancestors to the other great apes – yes.

    And, yes, I know for certain people that disagree are lying on purpose, or lying, as do all addicts, to obscure and justify their addiction to the psychological returns on some other lie or set of lies.

    Furthermore I know because of my genetic predispositions my clan has evolved more so than most other humans because we lack pre-human demand for empathic and intuitionistic stimulation in order to maintain attention, reason, judgement, and decidability.

    And yes I know that those of us who are more evolved in these abilities that provide us with agency, are burdened by the remaining less evolved, undomesticated demi-human animals, who are still dependent on herd following intuitions, like the other animals we have domesticated.

    The difference is only that demi-humans, fed a perpetual diet of addictive lies providing the sensation that they are still welcome in the herd, can be ruled, and taxed, more cheaply and productively than they can be enslaved like their ancestors.

    Unfortunately we were too optimistic after the enlightenment and industrial revolution, and gave the demi-human half domesticated animals the vote – and for unsurprising reasons think they are conscious, rational, and possessed of agency, rather than semi-conscious, addicted to comforting lies, slaves who must be herded with more lies, like any addict.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 16:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75258567_495466877716874_54545145092

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75258567_495466877716874_5454514509215432704_o_495466867716875.jpg CLICK YOUR HEELS DOROTHY, WE FOUND HOME. 😉

    —“By establishing mitogenomic timelines, frequencies and dispersals, we show that the L0 lineage emerged within the residual Makgadikgadi–Okavango palaeo-wetland of southern Africa7, approximately 200 ka (95% confidence interval, 240–165 ka). Genetic divergence points to a sustained 70,000-year-long existence of the L0 lineage before an out-of-homeland northeast–southwest dispersal between 130 and 110 ka. Palaeo- climate proxy and model data suggest that increased humidity opened green corridors, first to the northeast then to the southwest. Subsequent drying of the homeland corresponds to a sustained effective population size (L0k), whereas wet–dry cycles and probable adaptation to marine foraging allowed the southwestern migrants to achieve population growth (L0d1’2), as supported by extensive south-coastal archaeological evidence8–10. Taken together, we propose a southern African origin of anatomically modern humans with sustained homeland occupation before the first migrations of people that appear to have been driven by regional climate changes.”—CLICK YOUR HEELS DOROTHY, WE FOUND HOME. 😉

    —“By establishing mitogenomic timelines, frequencies and dispersals, we show that the L0 lineage emerged within the residual Makgadikgadi–Okavango palaeo-wetland of southern Africa7, approximately 200 ka (95% confidence interval, 240–165 ka). Genetic divergence points to a sustained 70,000-year-long existence of the L0 lineage before an out-of-homeland northeast–southwest dispersal between 130 and 110 ka. Palaeo- climate proxy and model data suggest that increased humidity opened green corridors, first to the northeast then to the southwest. Subsequent drying of the homeland corresponds to a sustained effective population size (L0k), whereas wet–dry cycles and probable adaptation to marine foraging allowed the southwestern migrants to achieve population growth (L0d1’2), as supported by extensive south-coastal archaeological evidence8–10. Taken together, we propose a southern African origin of anatomically modern humans with sustained homeland occupation before the first migrations of people that appear to have been driven by regional climate changes.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:46:00 UTC

  • Define Scientism, because it’s usually a pseudoscientific or sophomoric criticis

    Define Scientism, because it’s usually a pseudoscientific or sophomoric criticism. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 00:27:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188975587483885571

    Reply addressees: @EdmontonRtb @StoicMDJ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188969409890488320


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188969409890488320

  • “Curt often sounds like August Comte redux”—Chip Sills Yep. —“The law is thi

    —“Curt often sounds like August Comte redux”—Chip Sills

    Yep.

    —“The law is this: that each of our leading conceptions – each branch of our knowledge – passes successively through… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494875381109357&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 00:09:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188970973539852289