Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science

  • are not ‘white’, any more than physics, chemistry, biochemistry, biology, cognit

    … are not ‘white’, any more than physics, chemistry, biochemistry, biology, cognitive science, economics, and natural law of reciprocity are ‘white’. They are laws of the physical universe, and the natural laws of mankind – neither of which we can disobey without suffering.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 14:30:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192811682113961987

    Reply addressees: @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192811246451601408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei Suppression of expression, discipline in mind, emotion, body, reproduction (sex), and soul; truthful speech no matter the cost; defense of life, property, contract and commons no matter the cost; heroism, excellence, and beauty regardless of cost; extension of christian love …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192811246451601408


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei Suppression of expression, discipline in mind, emotion, body, reproduction (sex), and soul; truthful speech no matter the cost; defense of life, property, contract and commons no matter the cost; heroism, excellence, and beauty regardless of cost; extension of christian love …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192811246451601408

  • No one who knew anything about anything would use ‘disproved’ in a scientific co

    No one who knew anything about anything would use ‘disproved’ in a scientific context.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 02:30:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190093806361829376

    Reply addressees: @EvoClast

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190091642801283072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @EvoClast

    @curtdoolittle
    re: Micro-evolution–disproved?
    This web page’s arguments try just that.
    https://t.co/NpWD8M73EX

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190091642801283072

  • starts out by saying that Einstein was revolutionary for saying that “length is

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute—“Doolittle starts out by saying that Einstein was revolutionary for saying that “length is not static; it changes according to its placement in the universe”. The Theory of Relativity was NOT invented by Einstein, but by Henri Poircaré….”—

    What the f–k does that have to do with anything I said. (a) einstein invented the frame, period, end of story, (b) like all of us he combined recent works of others, into a solution none of them had seen – as do all thinkers, myself included, (c) you clearly are not informed or smart enough to comment on this subject.

    Yes, einstein gets an undeserved and disproportionate amount of the credit. It’s equally deserved to Lorentz and Especially Hilbert, who is far smarter than einstein.

    Yes, there is a very great similarity between Einstein getting the rewards from what was lorentz and hilbert’s work, just as Zuckerberg is getting rewards from what was the brother’s work.

    Read this and learn:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute

    Likewise, just because I united popper’s falsification, strawson’s performative truth, chomsky’s grammar, and hayek’s law – and explained why poincare, brouwer and bridgman lost the opertionalist argument, doesn’t mean I”m plagiarizing, any more than einstein taking the various works of others, adding to and uniting them.

    We all stand on the shoulders of others, and all of us move the needle one step at a time forward. Yes, Poincare and lorentz (and maxwell) solved the underlying problem. But no they couldn’t provide the completion of it. I know your motivation is to discredit their only ‘virtuous’ intellectual amidst the long line of criminal liars all the way back into their origins. But it doesn’t work. It just makes you look stupid.

    Don’t stomp on a post to for attention, or to vent from failure to understand, or stress of your own mental reorganization. All you do is tell us you feel out of control in your life. Instead, Post to contribute. And Ask don’t assert.Updated Oct 31, 2019, 8:32 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:50:00 UTC

  • BELOW THE QUANTUM (worth repeating) … At present we deduce that a difference i

    BELOW THE QUANTUM
    (worth repeating)

    … At present we deduce that a difference in fundamental charges is producing a subsequent difference in fundamental charge distributions that we call… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496038054326423&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:16:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189576881701621762

  • SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS? I use ‘frothy’ universe, and K

    SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS?

    I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496035764326652&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:13:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189575961936826369

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX As in all things there is no paradox, just an open que

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    As in all things there is no paradox, just an open question, no paradoxes exist.

    One can falsify the fermi question. It is falsifiable.We have failed to falsify… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496026190994276&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:57:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189571993164812290

  • RED QUEEN? —“I’m still not exactly sure what do you mean by defeating the red

    RED QUEEN?

    —“I’m still not exactly sure what do you mean by defeating the red queen because to me, red queen is part of the natural law (or rather one of its causes) and defeating nature is something leftists think they can do.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm. i mean staying ahead of the red queen?

    —“So, staying ahead of whoever happens to be in competition with you at the moment.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm broader. This planet is really dangerous and we are in a very ‘quiet’ period.

    This solar system is pretty dangerous and we are in a quiet period.

    This galaxy is in a pretty dangerous, and we are in a quiet period.

    I mean, until we are able to run around the universe we are kinda in competition with the red queen.

    After that WE ARE THE RED QUEEN.

    —“Okay, now I see. “You have to keep moving to stay in the same place.” I don’t think we can ever afford to stop moving so to me, ever defeating it remains out of the question. Staying ahead is right.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:53:00 UTC

  • WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY Good science is rarely publicized outsi

    WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY

    Good science is rarely publicized outside of the field,because it requires specialized knowledge to comprehend. Conversely, much of what passes for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496015707661991&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:32:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189565840645152768

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX… https://t.co/hwHRu2Sc31


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:17:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189561887442247681

  • MONKEY SUPREMACIST? —“We can’t evolve away from an evolutionary branch. We did

    MONKEY SUPREMACIST?
    —“We can’t evolve away from an evolutionary branch. We didn’t just evolve from monkeys, we are monkeys. And I refused to be ashamed of that. In fact, I am a monkey supremacist.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:14:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189546118281154560