Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81808273_550546745542220_28844016769

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81808273_550546745542220_2884401676947554304_o_550546738875554.jpg WHY IS THERE OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST? (LESSONS)

    Hydrocarbons are from dead organic material – and you need an astonishing set of circumstances to make oil out of these things and preserve them.

    First, you’ve got to concentrate them somewhere where they’re not dispersed or oxidized – which means in swamps, marshes, lakes or something like that. (See “Peat Marshes” and “Bog Bodies”.) Then you’ve got to heat them up slowly over a long, long period to cook them up to make oil. And then, when they make oil and start to ‘ferment’, you’ve got to have some way of trapping the liquid and the gas.

    All these things, it turns out, happen on the margins of continents. Sediments just get washed in, and all those dead things get buried deeper and deeper and gently get cooked for a long time. So, the circumstances for making oil are very good on the margins of continents. Especially the margins of oceans that aren’t on a plate boundary – because there are no earthquakes there.

    Now, what happened in Saudi Arabia is that that happened to be on the margin of a huge ocean which separated Asia from the southern continents. So, a hundred million years ago, Africa, India and Arabia were all a long way further south from where they are now and they’ve all moved north and bashed into Asia.

    One of those places is [what is now] Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.

    And what’s happened is the margin of that ocean, with the margins of Arabia, and Africa and India, have all just popped up above sea level from the pressure of colliding together.

    Millions of years ago, most of the Middle East was covered by what scientists call the Tethys Ocean (aka Tethys Sea). Rivers flowing into the ocean gave rise to trillions of microscopic organisms and other marine plants and animals. The corpses of these organisms on the ocean floor is where oil (and natural gas) comes from. This is why they are called fossil fuels.

    Over millions of years, this decomposing organic material became covered by miles of new organic matter and also the sand and salt flowing in from the rivers and streams. Yes, salt flows into the ocean from freshwater rivers and streams. Anyway, these layers became more and more packed as newer layers formed on top of the previous layers. The pressure and heat from these upper layers change the buried organic matter into a sludgy substance of hydrocarbons and other compounds that constitute what we know as crude oil. Theoretically, as long as marine life keeps dying, oil will keep being created

    So it’s not that there is more oil in the middle east than anywhere else. There’s loads of oil on the other continental margins – but that’s all underwater. It’s hard and expensive to get out. Whereas in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq it’s popped up nicely above sea level and also in. So it’s actually extremely easy to find, an cheap to take out.

    It’s just more that it is conveniently situated than anything else.

    (Source: From an interview with James Jackson from the University of Cambridge and other sources on the internet, map from paleomap project)WHY IS THERE OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST? (LESSONS)

    Hydrocarbons are from dead organic material – and you need an astonishing set of circumstances to make oil out of these things and preserve them.

    First, you’ve got to concentrate them somewhere where they’re not dispersed or oxidized – which means in swamps, marshes, lakes or something like that. (See “Peat Marshes” and “Bog Bodies”.) Then you’ve got to heat them up slowly over a long, long period to cook them up to make oil. And then, when they make oil and start to ‘ferment’, you’ve got to have some way of trapping the liquid and the gas.

    All these things, it turns out, happen on the margins of continents. Sediments just get washed in, and all those dead things get buried deeper and deeper and gently get cooked for a long time. So, the circumstances for making oil are very good on the margins of continents. Especially the margins of oceans that aren’t on a plate boundary – because there are no earthquakes there.

    Now, what happened in Saudi Arabia is that that happened to be on the margin of a huge ocean which separated Asia from the southern continents. So, a hundred million years ago, Africa, India and Arabia were all a long way further south from where they are now and they’ve all moved north and bashed into Asia.

    One of those places is [what is now] Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.

    And what’s happened is the margin of that ocean, with the margins of Arabia, and Africa and India, have all just popped up above sea level from the pressure of colliding together.

    Millions of years ago, most of the Middle East was covered by what scientists call the Tethys Ocean (aka Tethys Sea). Rivers flowing into the ocean gave rise to trillions of microscopic organisms and other marine plants and animals. The corpses of these organisms on the ocean floor is where oil (and natural gas) comes from. This is why they are called fossil fuels.

    Over millions of years, this decomposing organic material became covered by miles of new organic matter and also the sand and salt flowing in from the rivers and streams. Yes, salt flows into the ocean from freshwater rivers and streams. Anyway, these layers became more and more packed as newer layers formed on top of the previous layers. The pressure and heat from these upper layers change the buried organic matter into a sludgy substance of hydrocarbons and other compounds that constitute what we know as crude oil. Theoretically, as long as marine life keeps dying, oil will keep being created

    So it’s not that there is more oil in the middle east than anywhere else. There’s loads of oil on the other continental margins – but that’s all underwater. It’s hard and expensive to get out. Whereas in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq it’s popped up nicely above sea level and also in. So it’s actually extremely easy to find, an cheap to take out.

    It’s just more that it is conveniently situated than anything else.

    (Source: From an interview with James Jackson from the University of Cambridge and other sources on the internet, map from paleomap project)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:59:00 UTC

  • I don’t understand. hawking radiation was an achievement. Black holes an achieve

    I don’t understand. hawking radiation was an achievement. Black holes an achievement. What’s the deal with Hawking?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:38:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215281764110938113

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215120618942844928


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215120618942844928

  • Math is math, science is science, there is just SOME overlap. But pure math is n

    Math is math, science is science, there is just SOME overlap. But pure math is not scientific, only applied mathematics. It just turns out that pure math ‘tricks’ (techniques) can sometimes be very useful describing physical phenomenon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 03:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215116399934427141

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215115511459086336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215115511459086336

  • I mention Einstein pretty often. I can’t really pick on Hawking. If i start with

    I mention Einstein pretty often. I can’t really pick on Hawking. If i start with mathiness in physics I’d be here for month typing.

    But like any very good mathematician would say: “Truth is for philosophers, we just do math.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 03:32:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215114160708734976

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215103982886146048


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215103982886146048

  • P IS A LEAP IN THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. SORRY. MAN UP AND LEARN. —“Brandon Hayes

    P IS A LEAP IN THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. SORRY. MAN UP AND LEARN.

    —“Brandon Hayes so in other words p has similar descriptive and predictive powers to things like astrology and Marxism. If you recite these dogmas enough I’m sure they come to seem like objective truths, but my suggestion would be that you read a few things that are not by other cult members, or books of quotations taken out of context”—John Tangney

    Alright you overconfident idiot, let’s dance.

    —“Lol, who writes your dialogue?”—John Tangney

    1. Is science defined as the use of the scientific method or not? If not, then what is it defined as?

    2. Is that scientific method justificationary or falsificationary?

    3. Is mathematics the logic of constant positional relations, if not then what?

    4. What are the limits of mathematics as we currently understand them? (I’ll tell you: quantum mechanics (probability at the low end), and economics (probability at the high end). Why? Informational availability and categorical consistency.

    5. So is prediction in science limited? Or limited is it by current mathematical understanding? (I’ll tell you: it’s a limit of our current understanding of single-position mathematics, and we haven’t – see Wolfram – developed the geometric equivalent that we have in curves (calculus ), lines (geometry), points (arithmetic). It appears that it is not possible for humans without the help of computers. We can however use variation from intermediary symmetries (constants) in the meantime.

    6. Is prediction or explanation by constant relations a test of falsification? It doesn’t matter.

    P is a falsificationary, operational, explicatory, logic of limits. It is predictive given information (bounded rationality), and is predictive given symmetries (findings of general rules of economics). It cannot be as mathematics can be closed, because we can innovate and axioms can’t.

    Not only is P itself scientific, it defines science and the scientific method completely.

    Now watch john engage in GSRRM, Pilpul and Critique.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 10:38:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY Human behavior is all physics. It has to b

    ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY

    Human behavior is all physics. It has to be. Economics is just physics with debts and credits. Our consciousness is just a vehicle for negotiating terms of cooperation. Cooperation is just a means of obtaining higher returns on investments of time and calories.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 10:44:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81188343_177397240325104_60880656031

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81188343_177397240325104_6088065603199827968_n_177397236991771.jpg DEFINITIONS: “RED QUEEN”, “NATURE’S RED QUEEN”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis?DEFINITIONS: “RED QUEEN”, “NATURE’S RED QUEEN”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 18:14:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) The first four minutes of this video are nonsense. There is no

    (from elsewhere)

    The first four minutes of this video are nonsense. There is no conflict between the coordinate system (our means of description) and the change in the background (described by that coordinate system), and the motion of the particle (energy, change) through the background. He’s confusing the math with reality given that we don’t know the underlying geometry, so we have to resort to use of aggregates (the wave function). Math is a language (logic, grammar) of positional names ideal for the description of constant relations (patterns). If history is a judge of anything, we are stuck in a problem that Hilbert warned us about, and Einstein and Bohr trapped us into, by using probability (aggregates) instead of solving the problem of the underlying geometry. Whether that geometry is a circular (loops) creating a 3d space, or triangles and tetrahedrons creating 3d space, the resulting pattern of which is loops or strings, is something we don’t know and it’s why quantum mechanics and relativity are seemingly incompatible. They make use of two aggregates describing two different patterns. Both theories are correct. The same way that biology and chemistry are correct. But the geometry underneath quantum mechanics is something we just don’t know yet. Unfortunately mathematical platonism is as infectious a disease in physics as it is in mathematics – and lest not even get started on economics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 16:12:00 UTC

  • SOVIET UNION WAS LEADING THE USA IN 28 AREAS OF APPLIED SCIENCE” Dec 25, 2019, 9

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy6sRUSB4xA”THE SOVIET UNION WAS LEADING THE USA IN 28 AREAS OF APPLIED SCIENCE”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy6sRUSB4xAUpdated Dec 25, 2019, 9:41 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-25 21:41:00 UTC

  • RT @DegenRolf: Meta-analysis: Almost exactly 10% of the population are left-hand

    RT @DegenRolf: Meta-analysis: Almost exactly 10% of the population are left-handers, with the share being higher in sporting elites. https:…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-21 05:26:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1208257378958954496