Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • THE NEXT ERA OF DOMESTICATION: ENDING ISLAM AND THE RELIGION OF IGNORANCE —“Cu

    THE NEXT ERA OF DOMESTICATION: ENDING ISLAM AND THE RELIGION OF IGNORANCE

    —“Curt Doolittle Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”—

    We are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination.

    Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination.

    SInce all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims.

    The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion.

    End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians.

    #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 04:00:00 UTC

  • Allah is the devil and muslims are his fools. #NewRight

    Allah is the devil and muslims are his fools. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 03:30:00 UTC

  • Muslims clearly treat themselves as disposable in the pursuit of Islam. I agree.

    Muslims clearly treat themselves as disposable in the pursuit of Islam.

    I agree.

    We need to do a lot more disposing.

    Help them find paradise in the next world and save paradise we have made of this one. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 09:42:00 UTC

  • If your concept of god is “him who created the rules of the universe”, then if P

    If your concept of god is “him who created the rules of the universe”, then if Physical law, Natural Law, Common Law, Norms, Traditions, Myths and Rituals are identical, then man has followed the commands of god and become one with god’s deigns.

    And only evil does otherwise.

    Any religion incompatible with physical and natural law is not divine: it is either error or the work of the devil.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 05:50:00 UTC

  • “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”– (“Kill them all. Let god sort

    –“Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”–

    (“Kill them all. Let god sort them out.”)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 03:15:00 UTC

  • One may only have the ABILITY to imitate, and not reason. But why does one have

    One may only have the ABILITY to imitate, and not reason. But why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism?

    In other words, why does one possess freedom of religion if religion is incompatible with natural law?

    And if a right requires natural law?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 04:11:00 UTC

  • Why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism?

    Why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 04:10:00 UTC

  • If I reject Babylonian, Jewish, and Egyptian mysticism, that does not mean I rej

    If I reject Babylonian, Jewish, and Egyptian mysticism, that does not mean I reject christian love and paternalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 18:50:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715249863559147520

    Reply addressees: @soapjackal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715222428339691520


    IN REPLY TO:

    @soapjackal

    @curtdoolittle I imagine Ill have to wait for your book in regards to a non-sophist rejection of Christianity (I remain unconvinced thus far

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715222428339691520

  • If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you

    If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you look hard enough. Most philosophers looked hard enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 11:14:00 UTC

  • You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would tr

    You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would try to learn from literature the way we learn from myths and parables. Just because you derive wisdom from something doesn’t mean it’s a test of truth or necessity.

    WTF is wrong with these people. They’re freaking crazy. The fact that they’re spouting crazy literature as if it’s science conveys upon them some sort of protection? Why? I don’t listen to schizophrenics. I don’t listen to german rationalists for that matter.

    I consider myself a religious and spiritual person, even if my concepts of these things are somewhat esoteric – scientific even – to the point where its arguable we are talking about the same things. I am skeptical of people who lack such things because there is too high an incidence of sociopathy among them.

    But people who argue using religious literature are no different from people arguing by referring to Dr Seuss. It’s ridiculous.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 15:30:00 UTC