Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • THE TRUTH IS VISIBLE IN JESUS’ MYTHOS Jesus told us to love one another. He did

    THE TRUTH IS VISIBLE IN JESUS’ MYTHOS

    Jesus told us to love one another. He did not teach us to lie. But he was raised in a culture of myths and lies. And the language of mythology and lies was the only language of persuasion available to him. If he knew greek, he had not – like most primitive people’s – yet learned Greek reason. And if he did know of greek reason, it’s quite possible he saw it as a threat, since it was the language of government and contract, not the language of the slaves, fishermen, herders, and farmers. We tend to forget that his people at that point in time were the equivalent of the Brazilian favelas, north American ghettos, Arab hinterlands, and Indian slums.

    So Jesus spoke in the form of persuasion available to him: myth and lie, and probably in the language he was raised with: Aramaic. And under the influence of the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Jewish totalitarian fairy tales we call the old testament.

    If you compare those authoritarian fairy tales to , Aesop’s Fables, Anglo, Scandinavian, Germanic, and Slavic Fairy Tales, the Geek and Roman Myths, the Arthurian Legends, the Germanic Niebelugelied, the Illiad and the Odyssey,, the Carolingian Saga, and Whig History (the continuous evolution of Europa), you will see the difference between the heroic man competing with the gods to sit among them, and the submissive man under a tyrannical god’s authority, producing the cultures of stagnation, and anti-science, and pervasive deceit.

    Why? The difference between many competing tribes in the fertile crescent with the concentration of wealth in the industrialization of the river valleys, and many homogenous tribes in the Eurasian forests and plains, limited to relatively small individual manors and farms.

    So Jesus he asked us to love one another the only way that he knew how, with the only appeal to truth and authority he know how, in the only language he knew how to use. His advice was that if we unified with love we could resist the aristocracy – that the solution to authoritarianism whether eastern totalitarian and immoral, or western contractual and moral, was to love each other, and to resist them.

    We cannot blame the people in prior eras for lacking the persuasive technologies that we invented after they passed. In each era we do the best that we can with the tools available to us.

    Yet with the luxury of our current knowledge, we can restate his very simple teachings from his ancient primitive language, from his ancient mysticism, from his ancient authoritarianism, from the language of deception, into the current language.

    1) Treat others as you yourself would be treated. Treat no other as you would not wish to be treated yourself. There is no law above the two sides of this moral coin.

    2) Reserve time to commune with your neighbors and contemplate how you may do this.

    3) Impose no costs upon those things that others have labored to obtain, because it will provoke retaliation by others, and this will harm all of us.

    In case we need reminding, this refers to:

    – The life, body, offspring, mates, and relations of others.

    – The property that others have obtained by discovery, production or trade, from those things justly discovered, produced, and traded.

    – The norms, traditions, laws, and institutions of others so long as they do not violate these rules.

    – Speak the truth at all times, no matter the consequence.

    – Neither act, coerce others to act, nor even think of these things.

    – Show charity to those who need it to the limit of your ability, without violating these rules.

    – In total: treat all others as your family – and we all shall become one. One family. Not in our imaginations, but in practice. Out of many we shall become one.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 05:05:00 UTC

  • THE JEWISH COSMOPOLITAN UTOPIAN PROGRAM IS THE FIFTH WAVE OF ANTI-ARISTOCRATIC R

    THE JEWISH COSMOPOLITAN UTOPIAN PROGRAM IS THE FIFTH WAVE OF ANTI-ARISTOCRATIC RELIGION (LIES)

    1 – the Zoroastrian Reaction (The creation of religion in response to the development of the Aryanism (heroism).

    2 – The Jewish Reaction (the creation of judaism in imitation of egyptian monotheism as a means of claiming property upon the departure of the persians and enforcing solidarity againts them.)

    3 – The Christian reaction (the creation of christianity in response to the roman conquest, moral law, and greak reason – the weaponization of the underclasses)

    4 – The Muslim Reaction (the weaponization of reproduction)

    5 – The Third Jewish Reactoin (the replacement of mysticism with pseudoscienence- Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Frankfurt).

    ALL THESE MOVEMENTS HAVE RESISTED OUR DOMESTICATION OF MAN AND HIS TRANSCENDENCE

    It’s not just ourselves. It’s humanity we must save.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 04:14:00 UTC

  • RELIGION AS WE UNDERSTAND IT WAS CREATED TO RESIST THE ARYANS: US

    RELIGION AS WE UNDERSTAND IT WAS CREATED TO RESIST THE ARYANS: US.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 04:02:00 UTC

  • “Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponi

    —-“Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponisation of reproduction are combined with the many aspects of the West’s ongoing eugenics programs, the winner is apparent. With the eventuality that scientific developments will render the gender-basis of the ‘herded’ and the ‘herding’ redundant, what, then, will be justifiable?”—- Lesley Keys

    (thank you for the excellent response btw)

    —A crime investigator would assert all perspectives are true within practical limitations—

    He would mean ‘honest’ not ‘true’. The fact that we conflate honesty(subjective testimony) with Truth (objectively correspondent description- or true name) is a common error in vernacular language. That we conflate these terms does not mean that they represent the same de-conflated phenomenon.

    — Agreed, Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponisation of reproduction are combined with the many aspects of the West’s ongoing eugenics programs, the winner is apparent.—

    Quotable. Quoted.

    —” what, then, will be justifiable?”—

    We justify that which lies within the terms of cooperation. We merely state as fact that which lies outside the terms of cooperation.

    There is no objective ‘good’ other than survival.

    If Islamic weaponization of reproduction of the underclass succeeds then it is by definition ‘good’ by the only standard that matters: survival.

    The question is whether we act to prevent it, by altering the values that we attach to our supposedly good and justifiable actions, so that we achieve an objective good (survival) rather than a subjective good that leads to our extinction.

    Our historical justifications then are WRONG.

    Our values are wrong.

    Our theories are wrong.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-30 06:22:00 UTC

  • THE LANGUAGE OF GOD? OR OF MEN? Sorry religious folk, but religious language is

    THE LANGUAGE OF GOD? OR OF MEN?

    Sorry religious folk, but religious language is a language of men, not god – science and mathematics are the language of god. Religious law is the command of men, not god – natural law discovered by science is the law of god. Heaven is not created by god, but created by men – it is nature that we domesticate for our use that produces paradise in a universe that is hostile to us. Prophets were not speaking the word of god, but spinning stories by men for the control and manipulation of the ignorant. There is nothing found in the lies of the prophets that cannot be stated truthfully in the language of god: Math, Scientific Truth Natual Law, Physical Law, created by god, put into the minds of man through his discovery, and put to work by the hand of man because of that discovery. God wrote to us with reality. He does not speak to us. We can only read his writings in the fabric of the universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-30 02:02:00 UTC

  • MONOTHEISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE, AND THE DOMESTICATION OF MAN

    https://propertarianforum.wordpress.com/2016/08/29/propertarian-podcast-003/ON MONOTHEISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE, AND THE DOMESTICATION OF MAN.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-29 15:34:00 UTC

  • (Hmmm…. I don’t know what human dignity means, but I know what life, body, mov

    (Hmmm…. I don’t know what human dignity means, but I know what life, body, movement, property, and contract mean. As far as I know, one of the central failings of Islam is the requirement for respect without having yet earned it by demonstrating it. Ergo, natural law, using common, judge-discovered law, under rule of law(universal application), and possessing universal standing produce all ends I know of. And duty and respect are not positive rights – they cannot be. They are earned rights, like all other: by reciprocity. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-24 10:28:00 UTC

  • (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my critic

    (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my criticism of Christianity is limited to the use of falsehoods, and demand for submission. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS. We’ve been discussing this in my corne

    THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS.

    We’ve been discussing this in my corner of the universe, and I tend to work with the following terminological sequence:

    Faith = recognition that you’re position is indefensible, but you report that you hold some position.

    Belief = a ‘signal’ in the report that you might decide in favor of the position were it of no cost to you, but that you aren’t accountable for the truth or falsehood of it.

    Know = that you are not signaling, but with present knowledge, will defend your claim that you will decide in favor of the position, even if it costs you minor reputation for defending it.

    Promise = that you are willing to commit status and reputation to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Warranty = that you are willing to commit materially to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Demonstrate = that you have chosen in favor of the position.

    We have a lot of evidence that says this hierarchy of costs reflects the ‘put’ that an individual is making on the proposition at hand.

    TYING TO EARLIER POST ON THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY as reducible to word games that attempt to escape accountability.

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154464857972264

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:26:00 UTC

  • “God is a hedge by the ir-responsible against the failures of the self, providin

    —“God is a hedge by the ir-responsible against the failures of the self, providing absolution consistent with time preferences, and an excuse not to go seek achievement of their capacity.”— John Jost

    Ouch. Yes that is an excuse. A use we put our gods to.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-22 08:46:00 UTC