“Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponi

—-“Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponisation of reproduction are combined with the many aspects of the West’s ongoing eugenics programs, the winner is apparent. With the eventuality that scientific developments will render the gender-basis of the ‘herded’ and the ‘herding’ redundant, what, then, will be justifiable?”—- Lesley Keys

(thank you for the excellent response btw)

—A crime investigator would assert all perspectives are true within practical limitations—

He would mean ‘honest’ not ‘true’. The fact that we conflate honesty(subjective testimony) with Truth (objectively correspondent description- or true name) is a common error in vernacular language. That we conflate these terms does not mean that they represent the same de-conflated phenomenon.

— Agreed, Islam is an innovation. When the strategies of enslavement of women and weaponisation of reproduction are combined with the many aspects of the West’s ongoing eugenics programs, the winner is apparent.—

Quotable. Quoted.

—” what, then, will be justifiable?”—

We justify that which lies within the terms of cooperation. We merely state as fact that which lies outside the terms of cooperation.

There is no objective ‘good’ other than survival.

If Islamic weaponization of reproduction of the underclass succeeds then it is by definition ‘good’ by the only standard that matters: survival.

The question is whether we act to prevent it, by altering the values that we attach to our supposedly good and justifiable actions, so that we achieve an objective good (survival) rather than a subjective good that leads to our extinction.

Our historical justifications then are WRONG.

Our values are wrong.

Our theories are wrong.

Curt Doolittle