Christianity does in fact produce mindfulness – as does and must, any religion. And mindfulness does in fact produce agency. The question is whether we can produce the same mindfulness but far greater agency if we retain the scientific (secular) content of the religion, reform the history, reform the lessons, reform the oath, and sacrifice/feast.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:50:00 UTC
IS NATURAL LAW A CULT?
(Literally, the one ‘true’ religion?)
—“Propertarianism and Testimonialism are made up religions.”— Joseph Kane
Um…. Testiness aside… You might argue that putting the Natural Law of reciprocity of Sovereign Men above all other considerations is just science, or you might say that choosing that science is equivalent to a religion. I wouldn’t disagree with you too much if you cast it as a religion.
– It provides an ultimate goal (transcendence),
– It provides a group evolutionary strategy (rapid adaptations through markets),
– It provides a moral ethical, and legal code (reciprocity),
– It puts limits on the actions of government,
– it requires a continuously born cost of truth telling, an oath, and the ritual of oath taking, the practice of military rituals and feasts.
– And for the western people, our history provides a non-false mythos of continuous success at the transformation of self and man into gods.
So as such *it would be one one true religion* for the simple reason that it would be the one religion without falsehood.
The Cult of The Law is the Religion of Men As Gods.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 21:34:00 UTC
CHRISTIANITY AND THE WILL TO POWER
by Jeff Urizen
As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man.
When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion.
Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will.
Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World.
This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world.
Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey.
The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base.
The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets.
Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this.
Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man.
When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion.
Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will.
Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World.
This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world.
Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey.
The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base.
The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets.
Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this.
Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 12:47:00 UTC
RELIGION IS A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE MILITIA
As far as I know the criteria for a cult (religion) is that one take oath to a falsehood in exchange for group membership, group limitation on political coercion, and group emotional insurance, and the promise of some future (utopian) good.
As far as I know, taking an oath to sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty for the promise of continuous goods and future transcendence for the self, kin, nation, and mankind is not a falsehood.
As far as I know the militia and the polity, under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty provide all those insurances.
As far as I know the an oath of reciprocity requires nor tolerates a falsehood.
The difference is we pay real costs for the militia, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty, and we pay no costs for the other than recitation of falsehoods for cults and religions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 12:39:00 UTC
Moritz brings up yet again that many young men want a new religion. And their criteria for a philosophy, is simply an inspirational theology. And I’m fully aware of this criticism. Propertarianism is structured as a philosophy out of utility – the utility of falsifying rationalist philosophy. But what I’m writing is LAW. Uniting science (physics, economics, sociology, psychology, metaphysics), and law into a single commensurable language across all disciplines providing a means by which we can suppress falsehoods, and particularly the abrahamic falsehoods (pilpul/critique) and the modern versions of them (postmodernism/marxism). And with that law providing a constitution that makes it possible to restore the specific uniqueness of the west, and our ability to drag ourselves, and humanity, kicking and screaming into transcendence: evolutionary progress. There is no reason for you to like the law. On the explanatory power and commensurability and decidability it provides. It slaughters all your sacred cows. But then again, why do you need falsehoods? My position is that the weak of body, spirit, and mind, need them and the strong of body, spirit, and mind do not. Those who are weak will never judge, never govern, never rule. They are only important in that they will fight for the material incentives provided by defeat of the parasites and the rescue of our civilization – or not. Very few of us our needed. The weak can stay home. Meaning – if you need a cult, you and your genes are a part of the problem, and of no value to the solution. The meek won’t inherit the earth. They will only live with the permissions give to them by those that do.
Moritz brings up yet again that many young men want a new religion. And their criteria for a philosophy, is simply an inspirational theology. And I’m fully aware of this criticism. Propertarianism is structured as a philosophy out of utility – the utility of falsifying rationalist philosophy. But what I’m writing is LAW. Uniting science (physics, economics, sociology, psychology, metaphysics), and law into a single commensurable language across all disciplines providing a means by which we can suppress falsehoods, and particularly the abrahamic falsehoods (pilpul/critique) and the modern versions of them (postmodernism/marxism). And with that law providing a constitution that makes it possible to restore the specific uniqueness of the west, and our ability to drag ourselves, and humanity, kicking and screaming into transcendence: evolutionary progress. There is no reason for you to like the law. On the explanatory power and commensurability and decidability it provides. It slaughters all your sacred cows. But then again, why do you need falsehoods? My position is that the weak of body, spirit, and mind, need them and the strong of body, spirit, and mind do not. Those who are weak will never judge, never govern, never rule. They are only important in that they will fight for the material incentives provided by defeat of the parasites and the rescue of our civilization – or not. Very few of us our needed. The weak can stay home. Meaning – if you need a cult, you and your genes are a part of the problem, and of no value to the solution. The meek won’t inherit the earth. They will only live with the permissions give to them by those that do.
by Alex Macleod –“You cannot have an enemy be the core of your culture.”– To put it very simplistically isn’t that what Judaism (goyim), Mohamedism (unbelievers) and Christianity (the devil) have? (Curt: Exactly. The abrahamic religions are the semitic pastoralist revolt against the agrarian metal workers. Thus explains the invention of organized religion as a resistance movement against transcendence [property].)
by Alex Macleod –“You cannot have an enemy be the core of your culture.”– To put it very simplistically isn’t that what Judaism (goyim), Mohamedism (unbelievers) and Christianity (the devil) have? (Curt: Exactly. The abrahamic religions are the semitic pastoralist revolt against the agrarian metal workers. Thus explains the invention of organized religion as a resistance movement against transcendence [property].)
—“A religion that doesnt “ought” and “oughtnt” isn’t a religion”—Vivek Na
—“A religion that does “is” and “isn’t” isn’t a religion.”— 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 15:30:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005834474528141314
THE LAW ALLOWS US TO CREATE RELIGIONS THAT ARE NOT FALSE
—“Humans really don’t live day to day in the “conscious” “rational” mode, you know this but it seems you unconsciously push against this fact.”— SG Simmons
Because religions are relativistic and truth absolute.
As such in matters of conflict, the truth and the law, supercede religion – for the simple reason that they do in fact supercede it.
For some reason it is inconceivable to people that we can create religions (as the stoics tried to, as buddha tried to, and the japanese do) that are in fact, not false.
But this is why I have to work on this problem so hard. And why law is so important. So that we can end the undecidability of religions and produce one that is decidable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 12:38:00 UTC