—“Let’s face it: the Abrahamic religions have brought about one disaster after another. And every Empire from Alexander on has fallen, usually because on racial, ethnic, or religious tension. Ok, maybe not as bad as Communism, but it has never been successful. Singapore – since I quoted LKY – has been, is, and always will be at least 75% Chinese for this very reason.”— Sean Ring Disclosure: I’m Catholic.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 03:34:00 UTC
https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/It’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission.
Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission.
Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)).
The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust.
Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence.
So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas.
Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender.
Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script).
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 09:44:00 UTC
—“Rewriting the Bible with Propertarian language in line with truth and the natural law of reciprocity would instantly create the religion that many keep demanding of you without any sacrifice in terms of what direction propertarianism would carry the country and by extension the world. The re-domestication of Christians would be a net positive for everyone.”—
That is VERY FKING SMART. Never occurred to me. I think in terms of writing the law. A ‘law book’. But you know the influence such a bible would have would be … well…wow Completing jefferson’s project. I think you just solved my last problem. dammit. I hate it when the answer is in my face
—“I know the religious problem is difficult because there is so much convoluted language involved. It’s tough to sort out meaning but this could actually be to the advantage of Propertarianism. Now that your sights are on it you’ll be able to sort it out even better than me because of your mastery in scientific language.”—
I think… I think we could create a sort of wiki and do a paragraph by paragraph translation and combine the repetitive stories into one… hmmm…. yep. I’ve re-written two – cain and abel, and the garden of eden, but the whole book can be done?
“In the beginning…” becomes an opportunity for comparative religion, and the opportunity to herald christianity…hmm…
—“Exactly! It’s really brilliant and I think it is precisely what is needed to “lift the vail” from the eyes of the western world.
I’ll see if I can make time this week to write up a sample to submit for your analysis.”—
We write the Law (rome) rewrite Aristotle(greece), and Rewrite the Bible (byzantium) and … well, you know, that sort of unites Germania, Rome, Athens, Byzantium, jerusalem, Mesopotamia and Persia. hmm… even india. Even china….
Ugh.. Like I don’t have enough work to do…. sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 14:16:00 UTC
BLAME THE MAN IN THE MIRROR – UNTIL WE ACT
—The west is defeated by the same abrahamic deception in the modern world as in the ancient. So is it our fault for allowing it again? Or the fault of abrahamic peoples for exploiting our weakness? The man in the mirror is the man at fault.—
The Natural Law – “The White Law” – will end the use of deceits against our people forever.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 12:29:00 UTC
WHAT IS A GOOD GOD? (AND ONE THAT CAN EXIST)
—“man is the only god, and only if he makes himself into one.”— Curt Doolittle
—“Sir, help me to understand this, from your own experience and I understand that truth is objective, no lies anymore like you keep saying, how can one make himself into a god? Thank you. Please make it practical for me”—Kofi
Kofi – I am sorry to confuse you. It is very simple really: we (mankind) are slowly making ourselves from beasts, into men, into ‘demi-gods’, and into ‘gods’. Not as individuals, but together as humanity. One day at a time one year at a time, we slowly painfully with very much suffering, create power over the plants and animals, over ourselves, over the earth, and over the forces of nature. Our gods our just our visions of ourselves. And we are making ourselves into the gods we imagine. SOme of us imaging good gods, and some of us a bad gods. But we all evolve into the gods we imagine.
Love to you my brother.
Let me know if I must say more.
—“Thank you, you should explain to me what a god is. And what constitutes good or bad god”—
What constitutes a good or bad man? What constitutes a man who is good from a man that can DO good? What constitutes people who think and feel they are good, from a people who do good?
There is a difference from thinking you are good, being good, doing good, and making a nation of good people, doing good.
(to be continued….
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 11:57:00 UTC
—“What is the propertarian position on religion? Is Christianity merely tolerated? And is some form of religion to be valued?”—Arnar Styr Björnsson
That it is in need of another reformation or it will continue to die. Neither the vatican II or the evangelical movements were sufficient – although the evangelical more so.
0) Humility in the sacredness of life, nature, and commons
1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
The rest is pure nonsense, and it is bad for our people.
However, nothing much needs to be done.
Restore the church to centrality of education, require that they teach mindfulness (stoicism), and a program of continuous stoicism, and restore consumer banking and the militia to the church again. In exchange require the churches who obtain those benefits to reform. (they can determine that reform themselves)
Personally I prefer we eliminate all political religions and restore folk religions (family, ancestors, people, nature).
The market pressure for attendance and income with take care of itself.
Much more detail. just not in this post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-03 23:22:00 UTC
Because Odin existed, and was a leader, teacher, and law giver.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 20:11:00 UTC
Mindfulness can be provided truthfully or untruthfully. Mindfulness is extremely rewarding. So rewarding that we defend it. Religion provides an addiction response, and the natural response of addicts to defend the source of their addiction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 14:15:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090614426259079168
Mindfulness can be provided truthfully or untruthfully. Mindfulness is extremely rewarding. So rewarding that we defend it. Religion provides an addiction response, and the natural response of addicts to defend the source of their addiction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 09:15:00 UTC
UNDERSTAND: RELIGION IS THE HARDEST PROBLEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
Because it is education and training of the intuition by suggestion using narrative, ritual, oath, and debt.
And because the intuition is the lowest common denominator of decidability in a population, demanding the least reason, calculation, and calculation.
We are not ignorant as we have been throughout history. What we call ‘spirituality’ is the evolutionary artifact of the reduction of cognitive, social, physical, and therefore emotional burden by submission to and membership in the pack(male bias) or herd (female bias), and the resulting feeling of peace, safety, and mindfulness that results from that submission (surrender of individuality) to the pack or herd.
The more agency, opportunity, experience, peace, safety, and mindfulness one has the lower the demand for the feeling of ‘spirituality’. The less agency, opportunity, experience, pace, safety and mindfulness on has, the greater the demand for the mindfulness that results from submission(surrender of individuality) to the pack or herd.
We cannot demand those lacking interpersonal, social, economic, political, and military market value survive without the training in mindfulness that makes possible individual, interpersonal, social, economic, political, and military cooperation with others and the benefits that come from it.
That would be IRRECIPROCAL.
However, we can at the same time limit the external agency of those who lack the agency and market value to use the political process to influence others where such an influence is against the natural law.
By the demand for truthful speech in the commons in matters commercial, … we eliminate the incentive to use the untestifiable for profit. By eliminating the need for churches to obtain donations, we likewise eliminate the incentive to use the untestifiable for profit. By demanding the churches warranty their due diligence in the production of education in the personal, interpersonal, social, commercial, financial, economic, political, and military.
This will have the effect of driving groups that are hostile to the natural law and to european civilization out of every aspect of life, and make ‘religions’ liable for the actions of their ‘products’: citizens.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 11:25:00 UTC