Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • ANSWERS TO THE SOPHISMS OF ABRAHMISTS “I never err. Truth is a gift of Our Old G

    ANSWERS TO THE SOPHISMS OF ABRAHMISTS

    “I never err. Truth is a gift of Our Old Gods of Europa for me to use for Our People In our War against the Evil Gods and their People who lie.”

    —“Christianity survived and encouraged the development of local and regional European identities for centuries. Yet somehow the West only became vulnerable as a result of post-war secularism. Christian Poland and Hungary are more resistant to globohomo than any secular country. Your bastardized liberalism is the illegitimate child of anti-Christian, anti-western Jewish talmudism, which was born of Babylonian semitic paganism.”—

    Lying is lying. You can justify lying all you want. But lying and denying is still lying and denying. šŸ˜‰ Now you might want to say that Christian lies are better than other lies, and that might be true,but escaping semitism whether old world or new is best of all.

    My Rule Of Law is entirely west indo-european, pagan, germanic, anglo: realism, naturalism, operationalism, testimonial truth, individual sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism -duty, excellence-beauty, law-jury, and competitive markets in everything – wherein the Church failed.

    Greek paganism by itself devolved into neo-platonic witchcraft. Germanic paganism turned people into white savages who practiced human sacrifice. All you value in the west was fostered by Christianity.

    Greco Roman Paganism was the best religion ever invented: “Rule of Law”, “Offering to the Empire” (fealty), and Keep your own gods and local customs. All we do is create order so that we can create trade, so that we can collect taxes, so that we can use taxes to create commons.

    Everybody keeps their own saints, heroes, demigods, gods, and demons, so that power distance is retained. The only concern of the state is material. And none may break the natural law of reciprocity (or property) without punishment.

    So you get your mythology for psychology, sociology, morality – but you get natural law and rule of law for ethics, economics, and politics, and group competition. This creates the optimum markets for people to cooperate peacefully if they are not engaged organized crime.

    So this is why the jews rebelled, because they had discovered usury in babylon,and had built a culture as an organized crime syndicate, which still exists today – profiting from undermining peoples who can create commons by baiting idiots (like you) into hazard with false promise.

    Our people can survive if you keep your mythology for the purpose of psychology, sociology and morality – the weak or feminine mind and body, but we must also have rule of law by natural law, ethics, economics, and politics for reality – the strong or masculine mind and body.

    But at present you are a useful idiot of our ancient enemy -an enemy we made as soon as alexander crossed the bosphorus and brough oriental lying into european truth.

    —“Funny the decline of the West only happened when Institutional Christianity was weakened. What have you done besides blame the church for everything after undercutting it? Atheists are the most useful pawns.”—

    No, the decline of the west occurred when The Second Semitic False Promise was let loose using the same Abrahamic technique of deceit as in judaism, christianity and islam: Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno(frankfurt), Derrida, Strauss, (jewish feminists), Rothbard, Kristol: Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism, Neoconservatism.

    —“Marx was an explicitly anti-Christian pagan occultist, and all relied on the dialectic created by Judeo-Anglo masonry that vilified the Christian order in favor of a new liberal secular order that was just rebranded pagan statism.”—

    Marx was an abrahamist, using the Abrahamic method of deceit: undermining a host population, by false promise, baiting the ignorant into hazard, using the fictionalisms of supernaturalism-occult, idealism-surrealism pseudsocience-magic, pilpul(sophism) and Critique(straw manning)

    It does not matter what you say, what you say you believe, only what you demonstrate as evidence. Marx was just another abrahamist using the abrahamic method of undermining by making unwarrantable untestable false promises to the dim and ignorant, to construct undermine a host.

    —-

    (BTW: yes, first quote is religio-bait)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 19:25:00 UTC

  • Nope. Jewish religion, jewish characters,jewish part of the world, semitic means

    Nope. Jewish religion, jewish characters,jewish part of the world, semitic means of coercion into a false religion,

    Why would anyone having aristotle, alexander, homer, epicurus and rome find anything in semitic lying?

    Because they are unfit for truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 18:09:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191417129280659456

    Reply addressees: @SamuelWhittemo4 @SiliconEdge @TempletonViktor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191416277883072512


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191416277883072512

  • Modern pseudoscience, sophism, and denial of reality, is just a reformation of j

    Modern pseudoscience, sophism, and denial of reality, is just a reformation of jewish-christian-islamic supernaturalism, sophism and denial of reality. It is still cult of submission evil, in exchange for abandonment of reality, so that you can pretend virtue in ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 18:05:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191416149147295744

    Reply addressees: @SamuelWhittemo4 @SiliconEdge @TempletonViktor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191412206824546306


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191412206824546306

  • WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY? As always, I’m running a test with multiple

    WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY?

    As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions:

    1) Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=499187910678104&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 02:06:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191174942504706048

  • WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY? As always, I’m running a test with multiple

    WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY?

    As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions:

    1) Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil faith to mask cowardice, laziness, and lack of agency, or will they fight for their people? We almost never find a ‘devout’ Christian willing to fight. Ever. They always have an excuse. They won’t show up without a guarantee. They won’t fight until it doesn’t matter, and like women with small children, wantto show up and get an everbody-wins-prize if other men do the winning. I mean, isn’t christian tolerance just an excuse to gossip rally and shame while one leftist program after another undermines our civlization? Does christian really mean “I’m a domesticated human farm animal and I need to follow the herd in safety, ignorance and bliss?

    2) Can we shame Christians into restoring masculinity to Christianity? Catholicism is dead in the next generation right? Traditional protestant denominations are dead. We only have the Evangelicals. About half go secular and half evangelical, and we’re gong to run out of christians to go evangelical soon. So, do we have to bring in Orthodoxy? How do we de-feminize de-loser Christianity? Because Orthodoxy works. Why? They don’t appeal to the trend, they stay with tradition.

    3) Can we shame or criticize them into the reality that it doesn’t matter if you OBEY scripture or dogma without question; or if you follow jesus’ example, even if biblical prose is ‘for children'(Spiritualism, Deism); or if you do so because traditionally it has worked (Rational Choice); or understand that natural law and jesus’ example is the scientifically optimum strategy for cooperation – especially in a commercial polity (Scientific Choice)?

    4) Or do we have to just assume all Christians are dead weight, will not fight for anything, will just coower at home and whine, and that we need to restore a pagan religion to save western civlization?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 21:06:00 UTC

  • As Far as I Know I’m Trying to Save Christianity

    As Far as I Know I’m Trying to Save Christianity https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/as-far-as-i-know-im-trying-to-save-christianity-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:55:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190447238960570368

  • A Pair of Compromises

    [T]he quote “Deliver Each Unto God and Caesar” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition.

  • A Pair of Compromises

    [T]he quote “Deliver Each Unto God and Caesar” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition.

  • The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions

    The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/the-economics-and-ethics-of-abrahamic-religions/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:50:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190446098529312768

  • The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions

    (this one is going to hurt. hold on to something) [T]here is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction. I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic. I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors. The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring. Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade. Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites. Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy. So pay your way.