Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • All, I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either

    All,

    I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either to Vox or to James. I follow James. I pay no attention to Vox. I sometimes pay attention to EMJ.

    But… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500491240547771&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 23:22:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191858387203571718

  • THE DEFINITION OF ABRAHAMISM Abrahamism (noun) The use of false promise, baiting

    THE DEFINITION OF ABRAHAMISM

    Abrahamism (noun)

    The use of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of straw-manning, disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other.

    FULL

    In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards.

    All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Pilpul vs Critique.

    COMMON TACTICS

    1) Restatement of Myth as History

    2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law

    3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”)

    4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance.

    5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance.

    6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods.

    7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods.

    8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge.

    9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.

    FULL ANALYSIS

    Mankind’s Enemy’s Strategy

    Civilizational Destruction from Within;

    Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals Capital Destruction;

    Baiting into Hazard (certain risk);

    Those who are ignorant or lack agency;

    By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);

    Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul);

    Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw-manning)

    Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie);

    Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);

    For the purpose of profiting (by harm)

    From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining):

    … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,

    By not specializing in,

    … The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common

    … Warrantied

    By Specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk

    And Absent Warranty

    … Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion)

    … Informational Destruction (Academy)

    … Government (Facilitation of Conflict)

    … Legislation (Undermining by, Facilitation of Conflict, Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals, Parasitism, Capital exhaustion)

    … Rent-Seeking (special interests)

    … Corruption (influence)

    … Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts)

    … Law (specialization in coercion)

    … Finance (Parasitism and entrapment)

    … Tax and accounting (evasion)

    … Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining)

    … Sales Scams

    … Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational

    … Black Market Goods, services, and Information.

    … Check Cashing

    … Loan Sharking

    … Gambling

    … Pornography

    … Prostitution

    … Drug Dealing

    Thereby;

    … creating conflict,

    … destroying trust,

    … generating demand for restitution

    … generating demand for authority,

    An authority that recursively issues another iteration of

    … false promise,

    … baiting into hazard

    Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral

    And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption)

    until all accumulated assets:

    … genetic,

    … cultural,

    … normative,

    … artistic,

    … economic,

    … institutional and

    … political;

    have been consumed;

    by the conflict between classes and interests

    and by the expansion of the underclasses;

    whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by;

    … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy;

    … And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons;

    … Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 23:00:00 UTC

  • HARTH -> PERSONAL -> POLITICAL. 1. Chinese folk religion(nature), Taoism, Confuc

    HARTH -> PERSONAL -> POLITICAL.

    1. Chinese folk religion(nature), Taoism, Confucianism

    2. European heathanism(nature), Epicurean philosophy, Aristotelianism

    3. European heathenism, germanic paganism, traditional law.

    4. Japanese Shintoism, and Buddhism and Nationalism

    5. Indian Hinduism is borderline, but not bad

    .

    The only bad ones are semitic. Three monopoly totalitarian religions of mandatory obedience and ignorance, for the sole purpose of undermining others.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 22:28:00 UTC

  • All, I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either

    All,

    I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either to Vox or to James. I follow James. I pay no attention to Vox. I sometimes pay attention to EMJ.

    But Testimonial truth is a judicial discipline and it has no mercy. My work is hard enough for the smartest of us, and requires knowledge of multiple fields – especially law, economics, cognitive science, and the philosophy of mathematics and science. But most of all, it limits us to only what we can testify to when submitted as evidence. And there is every place for natural law and every place for christian love, but no place for faith in courts. Courts resolve differences between people who have many differences. Markets provide opportunities for cooperation despite our differences. And the state must create both court and market so we can cooperate despite our differences – especially differences in gender, class, experience, resources, agency, and age.

    I do not do theology, philosophy, or ideology, I do law – for engineering the possibility of cooperation between peoples regardless of their differences. A law with which I hope to restore the Church or Churches to an equal house of government, with exclusive dominion over birth, marriage, family, and death, and with which to crush our enemies whether hostile in faith, hostile in pseudoscience, hostile in sophistry, hostile linying; or hostile in denial of evidence left behind by the demonstrated behavior of man.

    My job is not to build a church. That is for the faithful. That is for you. But apparently, it is necessary to produce a clearing upon which others can build one. Because christianity has utterly failed as a political religion, has failed as a social religion, and is at present devolving into a folk religion – a pure ‘faith’ and not a religion. A Religion requires institutions to hold territory and people. And very shortly in civilizational time, christians will have none. And judaism’s undermining by the pseudosciences of marxism and feminism, and sophisms of postmodernism, and lying and denying political correctness and islam’s destruction of civilizations by rates of invasion, rates of reproduction and success in evangelism, have claimed every civlization that has not eradicated them.

    As always, deliver faith unto your god as is his due.

    But unlike god, Caesar (the court) cannot see, test, or trust your faith.

    And I do the work of Caesar.

    The work of faith is up to you.

    Affections.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:22:00 UTC

  • JESUS While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus

    JESUS

    While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500319197231642&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 17:31:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191770145825406978

  • THE ANSWER I’M LOOKING FOR FROM CHRISTIANS —“I’m a devout Roman Catholic man.

    THE ANSWER I’M LOOKING FOR FROM CHRISTIANS
    —“I’m a devout Roman Catholic man. If a peaceful separation of left and non parasitic producers into two or three separate countries doesn’t… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500269230569972&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 16:02:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191747718533799937

  • I WORSHIP MY PEOPLE I worship (pay debt to) Jesus(Love) just as I do to god in t

    I WORSHIP MY PEOPLE
    I worship (pay debt to) Jesus(Love) just as I do to god in the abstract (deism, universe, physical laws, and natural laws), god in the archetype (Sky Father, Sun), just as… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500265027237059&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 15:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191745796942811137

  • I worship (pay debt to) Jesus/Venus(Love) just as I do to god in the abstract (d

    I worship (pay debt to) Jesus/Venus(Love) just as I do to god in the abstract (deism, universe, physical laws, and natural laws), My People’s god in the archetypes Sky-Father/Zeus, Odin/Aristotle,Thor/Alexander, Spirits/Nature. No jealous god is a god, and monopoly is a crime. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 15:54:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191745579182968836

  • I worship (pay debt to) Jesus(Love) just as I do to god in the abstract (deism,

    I worship (pay debt to) Jesus(Love) just as I do to god in the abstract (deism, universe, physical laws, and natural laws), god in the archetype (Sky Father, Sun), just as I do to Odin (wisdom, cunning) and Thor (strength). No jealous god is a god, and monopoly is a crime. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 15:47:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191743958910734336

    Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @O2AutoSports

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191463791130624000


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191463791130624000

  • JESUS While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus

    JESUS

    While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly.

    I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false.

    I do true.

    Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood.

    I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t.

    Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve.

    Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 12:31:00 UTC