https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_pagans_in_the_late_Roman_EmpireTHE CHRISTIAN DESTRUCTION OF THE ANCIENT WORLD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_pagans_in_the_late_Roman_EmpireUpdated Jan 23, 2020, 8:49 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 08:49:00 UTC
THE FUNCTION OF GODS
Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders that circumvent the need for pack-leaders across families, clans, tribes, and nations, that allow us to express loyalty independent of family clan, tribe and nation. Religions are just a means of embodying rules of temporal and intergenerational behavior between families, clans, tribes, nations in ignorant, pre-literate, verbally transmitted form. False promise is a means of addicting us to following those rules despite our increase in powerlessness as the scale of our social and political orders increases – thereby alienating us. Judaism was and remains a means of constructing a mobile networked, organized crime family under the pretense of a religion. Islam is a means of constructing a universal army that conducts warfare against civilization by undermining from within and continuous raiding and attrition. Christianity was just a means of constructing a universal rebellion against civilization – but one that never managed to be able to govern because the military aristocracy and the enfranchisement of men in the military, and continuous warfare prevented it. Although were it not for the restoration of paganism via the vikings it’s not clear that we would have been able to resist islam or conduct the crusades. Christianity is just another untestifiable, unwarrantable, abrahamic false promise, to keep you ignorant and submissive and open to conquest by jews at the top and muslims at the bottom, and now, marxism, postmodernism, feminism use the same technique of false promise in the REAL world (future) instead of in the UNREAL world (after death).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 08:36:00 UTC
CHURCHIANITY VS CHRISTIANITY VS THE PHILOSOPHY OF JESUS.
You now, I follow the religion of my ancestors (Excellence, heroism, sovereignty, and debts that are ‘true’) and the philosophy of Jesus (purchase of cooperation through exhaustion of love, forgiveness, charity), and the philosophy of my civilization (falsification by realism, naturalism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, sovereignty-volition, reciprocity, and testimonial truth).
I use the philosophy of Jesus, Aristotle, and our ancestors long lost to history (European Aryanism). I understand that those that lack agency need christianity in exclusivity (monopoly) even if the rest of us use different archetypes for different purposes given that we have more agency (markets).
So it depends upon the portfolio of control you have over your life.
Modern life would suggest that the monopoly of the abrahamic deceits is harmful. And that we can see jesus as a philosopher of the personal and social if not the material, economic, political, military, and strategic. This is why I will always and everywhere recommend Markets (our group strategy) and criticize christianity (monpoly), as harmful. We need many saints, demigods, or gods (role models), but each of us may or must, choose the hierarchy of those gods that we will spend most of our time imitating.
I know who I use: Aristotle, Alexander, Caesar, Arthur, Jefferson and Hayek. And when
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 21:50:00 UTC
THE USES OF RELIGION WISDOM, AND SCIENCE AND TRUTH
Never use religion to make truth claims – you will always fail.
Use religion to make wisdom claims. That is the providence of religion.
In any contest between truth (science) and wisdom (myth) truth reigns.
It is when we lack sufficient knowledge to determine the truth, that we gracefully resort to wisdom. And we do so because it has survived the centuries, and because others will not blame us if we fail by such a choice.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 19:28:00 UTC
ABRAHAMISM IS AS ADVANCED A METHOD OF DECEIT AS ARISTOTELIANISM IS AN ADVANCED TECHNIQUE OF TRUTH TELLING
Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like Socratic Falsificationism, Platonic Idealism, Aristotelian Reason (testimony), Confucian wisdom (advice) – the only system of thought in the world that even came close to the European. The difference is that Abrahamism meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the Abrahamic technique. So are cultural marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, and neoconservatism. So are judaism, christianity, and Islam. It’s the most advanced form of lying ever invented by man, much as science is the most advanced form of truth telling ever invented by man. I’ve spent over a decade working on articulating the grammars (rules) of Aristotelian Truth and Abrahamic Deceit. So likewise, Islam is not primitive. It’s not a religion. It’s an informational and behavioral virus. It is the most advanced application of the most advanced system of deception ever invented by man – and causes the destruction, ignorance, decline, and dysgenia that results in everything it touches. Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism, and the denialism we call political correctness, are simply the application of the abrahamic method of deceit yet again destroy civilization from within by destruction of the human information system (“Social Construction”), using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), critique (undermining, conflict generation), avoidance of warranty, under plausible deniability, to profit from the destruction of a civilization, including genetic, cultural, institutional, economic, informational, and aesthetic capital.
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 09:21:00 UTC
Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”. That’s what ‘progressive’ meant. They continued the work of the church in secular prose. This allowed us to slowly decide if we could a given charity or… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=559344607995767&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 21:37:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219735804639170560
QUESTIONS FROM ELSEWHERE
—“Hi, I’ve been reading your blog. I want to know how Marxism and the push for communism was related to abrahamism. iirc Marxism tried to oppress islam and Christianity in Europe, so how does it relate to abrahamism? – possibly through Judaism? or simply commonalities with the religions it opposed? thank you for clarifying! i’m interested in your topics and want to better understand.”—
Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like platonic idealism, Aristotelian reason, or confucian wisdom. The difference is that it’s meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the abrahamic technique.
—“Ok, thanks! And, if it’s not too much trouble, I have other questions I’d like to ask you… 1) Who would you vote for in the US presidential election this year? – and – 2) You stated that it’s good for all races to reduce their ‘underclass’. Please define underclass? – and -2b how would you respond to people who think that the white birth rate must go up regardless of parents’ status?”—
1) I will vote for whatever not-democrat is running, so I assume that will be Trump.
2) Underclass is any group of people (a) unable to hold a family unit, (b) unable to produce offspring without subsidy from others (c) unable or unwilling to adapt to western (american) middle class manners, ethics, and morals, and probably (d) (implied) unable to adapt to christian ethics whether supernatural or secular.
3) (a) It is not clear at all that birth rates need to go up so much as we need to prevent immigrants, start work earlier and end it later and increase automation, and implement the financial reforms I’ve suggested that vastly reduce economic challenges and differences, so that only a single income is NECESSARY for the survival of a replacement rate family. (b) It’s more important that we end the demand for the absolute nuclear family and instead, restore the intergenerational family even if it means restoring intergenerational households. This includes reforming the marriage laws to make people liable once again for interference in a marriage etc. (c) and restore libel, and slander (defamation) and extend it to undermining of our traditions.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 20:51:00 UTC
OUR PROGRESSIVES VS THE ENEMY’S “PROGRESSIVES”
Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”. That’s what ‘progressive’ meant. They continued the work of the church in secular prose. This allowed us to slowly decide if we could a given charity or not, and then ‘feel christian’ in that we had accomplished a good.
But It was the ENEMY that used ‘Undermining”, divisiveness. Marxism to create a monopoly of power to undermine the classes. Postmodernism to create a monopoly of power by undermining truth, reason, and cooperation. Feminism to undermining the ‘Militia of Everyone’ and our militarized society where one could have respect regardless of class simply by doing his or her duty.
Denialism to create a monopoly herd of conformity to the lowest common denominator. Feminism to create a female monopoly of power over men in order to destroy the compromise between the genders in the only society ever to give women freedoms.
Behold europa, maker of heavens. Behold semitia, maker of hells.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 16:37:00 UTC
Good luck finding someone of higher IQ, who understands economic history’s relationship with supernatural, ideal, and real paradigms.Judaism, Christianity and islam created a dark age that we barely escaped from by the restoration reason in europe. Today’s left is a repeat of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 19:25:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218977739677536258
Reply addressees: @PeterAl09732414 @Fisted
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218969759003312129
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218969759003312129
The hardest subject I have still to promote into P-vernacular is the structural composition of tradition and religion as debts of inheritance both to us, and from us, and the economics of that transfer.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:35:00 UTC