Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • The Problem

    The Problem https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/the-problem/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 19:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253761704871096320

  • The Problem

    Apr 9, 2020, 8:29 PM THE PROBLEM [T]he problem for Christianity is that it only has one thing to trade -psychological comfort – or what we call mindfulness – and only half or less of the population is buying it. It doesn’t have ENOUGH to trade for the rest of the population to buy it. Yet christians are desperately trying to sell to a saturated market and in doing so losing market share. Instead what Christians, pagans, heathens, traditionalists, constitutionalists and seculars have to trade is unity against the enemy that would destroy our civilization – christian, pagan, heathen, traditional, constitutionalist, and secular. So sell the the only thing the market will buy: Unity in self defense. Unity in Offense. And Unity in Victory. Because selling monopoly is failing everyone. You can’t have control. You can only preserve our trifunctionalism: the equilibrium of military, legal, and religious -each in defense of the other.

  • The Problem

    Apr 9, 2020, 8:29 PM THE PROBLEM [T]he problem for Christianity is that it only has one thing to trade -psychological comfort – or what we call mindfulness – and only half or less of the population is buying it. It doesn’t have ENOUGH to trade for the rest of the population to buy it. Yet christians are desperately trying to sell to a saturated market and in doing so losing market share. Instead what Christians, pagans, heathens, traditionalists, constitutionalists and seculars have to trade is unity against the enemy that would destroy our civilization – christian, pagan, heathen, traditional, constitutionalist, and secular. So sell the the only thing the market will buy: Unity in self defense. Unity in Offense. And Unity in Victory. Because selling monopoly is failing everyone. You can’t have control. You can only preserve our trifunctionalism: the equilibrium of military, legal, and religious -each in defense of the other.

  • More Advocacy of Orthodoxy as A State Religion

    MORE ADVOCACY OF ORTHODOXY AS A STATE RELIGION (and correcting me) by James Dmitro Makienko [I] made a long detailed post on the christian denial of the laws evident in god’s hand. Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/253632416034919 James corrects me – as did others, that none of these criticisms apply to orthodoxy only to evangelicals and catholics. I might argue that the church of england might apply as well. (Where I was married) I agree on orthodoxy as the optimum political christian religion. I only argue that the evangelicals are closest to jesus’ teachings as a folk religion, and I only make that argument in order to advance some form of nationalist christianity that tolerates the entire spectrum of human cognition: feeling, intuition, reason, observation. The only thing I criticize in the slavic sphere (a) intermarium inability to produce commercial and military scale, and (b) russian inability to produce trust at scale, rule of law at scale, and use of rule of law to suppress corruption at scale. Conversely, the number of things I criticize in the west middle east and far east are endless. I tend to use christianity to refer to evangelical, protestant, and catholic divisions, and I call out orthodoxy in particular. I will try to correct this habit as “western christianity” instead of ‘christianity’ but I think it will be a hard habit to break. thank you for the ‘correction’. 😉 James correctly answers below. == From James Dmitro Makienko == To clarify on what you said about Christianity “denying”, NONE of that applies to Orthodox Church. Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY?

    1. physical laws of nature. – You won’t see any of this “young earth creation” crap in Orthodox churches, they are generally accepting of science now and don’t try to override it.
    2. the political law of homogeneity – Virtually every Orthodox church is nation-centered – hence you have Greek, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, Georgian, Armenian, Coptic Ethiopian, Coptic Egyptian, Romanian, North Macedonian etc – this is why it has such difficulty in multicultural countries like Canada and America to create its own indigenous Orthodox church. We have Armenian and Ethiopian that go to out church, but we are Ukrainian, do our liturgy in Ukrainian, and not destroying our identity because there are people who are not Ukrainian.

    3. the evolutionary law of transcendence – we venerate numerous saints who have transcended through their works, and a lot of them did it through military victories and statesmanship.

    4. the … law of self domestication – there are many ways such as numerous feasts/fasting throughout the year, which toughens you in case hard times hit, rituals you do, which presents a framework for all classes to work together and not go after each other

    5. the … law of competition. – Do you mean economic competition (no Orthodox will have an issue with that, most will be negative towards socialism) or competition on the marketplace of ideas (Orthodox church likes to test things against time, so thats why a lot of things may take a few generations to implement – it is slow, yet it exists and we recognize its importance)

    Now if you apply it to the modern evangelical Christianity you will see that:

    1. Laws of nature – lawsuits against teaching of evolution, “bible parks” that promote young earth creationism – they literally allocate millions of dollars that they fleece from their hapless flocks to promote their anti-scientific falsehoods.
    2. Homogeneity – all the multi-culti crap you hear from liberal media is in evangelical (especially mainline) churches “we’re all the same, in jesus name, god loves you regardless of your skin, lets sing kumbaya for jesus” etc. Canada’s United Church is the absolute worst in trying to cuck to the progressives

    3. Evolutionary law of transcendence – they do the opposite, they love to revel in underclasses, and promote the message of equality regardless of cost or merit.

    4. Self domestication? Not much on this front either, because why domesticate when jesus loves you the way you are

    5. Competition? This is where evangelicals are actually outdo themselves, as they like to latch onto different new worldly ideas and modify them for their needs. It sometimes may come at the cost of discarding doctrine – but who cares about doctrine when to be “saved” in evangelical christianity you just need to say a Shahada(declaration of faith) that “i accept jesus christ as my lord and savior” – just like in Islam (that Mo is the prophet).

    The speculation about an industrial age in the first or second century AD which Christianity allegedly averted makes about as much sense as if ancient Egypt didn’t collapse we’d all be living in the giant space-travelling pyramids heading for nearest stars. We wuz space vikangs and shiet (makes me think of that lost vikings game of the early 90s!) It is impossible to combine all of Christianity into one-size-fits-all model. As for the reasons of the collapse of the Roman Empire it’ll just take me too much time to research and argument. In brief, i think you give Christianity too much credit for the collapse of the Roman Empire, as most of the 4th century was spend by Christians coming up with a Nicene creed and confronting Arianism(Jesus created & not divine, non-trinitarian), then confronting Nestorianism(Mary mother of Jesus, dyophysitism of Christ etc).

  • More Advocacy of Orthodoxy as A State Religion

    MORE ADVOCACY OF ORTHODOXY AS A STATE RELIGION (and correcting me) by James Dmitro Makienko [I] made a long detailed post on the christian denial of the laws evident in god’s hand. Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/253632416034919 James corrects me – as did others, that none of these criticisms apply to orthodoxy only to evangelicals and catholics. I might argue that the church of england might apply as well. (Where I was married) I agree on orthodoxy as the optimum political christian religion. I only argue that the evangelicals are closest to jesus’ teachings as a folk religion, and I only make that argument in order to advance some form of nationalist christianity that tolerates the entire spectrum of human cognition: feeling, intuition, reason, observation. The only thing I criticize in the slavic sphere (a) intermarium inability to produce commercial and military scale, and (b) russian inability to produce trust at scale, rule of law at scale, and use of rule of law to suppress corruption at scale. Conversely, the number of things I criticize in the west middle east and far east are endless. I tend to use christianity to refer to evangelical, protestant, and catholic divisions, and I call out orthodoxy in particular. I will try to correct this habit as “western christianity” instead of ‘christianity’ but I think it will be a hard habit to break. thank you for the ‘correction’. 😉 James correctly answers below. == From James Dmitro Makienko == To clarify on what you said about Christianity “denying”, NONE of that applies to Orthodox Church. Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY?

    1. physical laws of nature. – You won’t see any of this “young earth creation” crap in Orthodox churches, they are generally accepting of science now and don’t try to override it.
    2. the political law of homogeneity – Virtually every Orthodox church is nation-centered – hence you have Greek, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, Georgian, Armenian, Coptic Ethiopian, Coptic Egyptian, Romanian, North Macedonian etc – this is why it has such difficulty in multicultural countries like Canada and America to create its own indigenous Orthodox church. We have Armenian and Ethiopian that go to out church, but we are Ukrainian, do our liturgy in Ukrainian, and not destroying our identity because there are people who are not Ukrainian.

    3. the evolutionary law of transcendence – we venerate numerous saints who have transcended through their works, and a lot of them did it through military victories and statesmanship.

    4. the … law of self domestication – there are many ways such as numerous feasts/fasting throughout the year, which toughens you in case hard times hit, rituals you do, which presents a framework for all classes to work together and not go after each other

    5. the … law of competition. – Do you mean economic competition (no Orthodox will have an issue with that, most will be negative towards socialism) or competition on the marketplace of ideas (Orthodox church likes to test things against time, so thats why a lot of things may take a few generations to implement – it is slow, yet it exists and we recognize its importance)

    Now if you apply it to the modern evangelical Christianity you will see that:

    1. Laws of nature – lawsuits against teaching of evolution, “bible parks” that promote young earth creationism – they literally allocate millions of dollars that they fleece from their hapless flocks to promote their anti-scientific falsehoods.
    2. Homogeneity – all the multi-culti crap you hear from liberal media is in evangelical (especially mainline) churches “we’re all the same, in jesus name, god loves you regardless of your skin, lets sing kumbaya for jesus” etc. Canada’s United Church is the absolute worst in trying to cuck to the progressives

    3. Evolutionary law of transcendence – they do the opposite, they love to revel in underclasses, and promote the message of equality regardless of cost or merit.

    4. Self domestication? Not much on this front either, because why domesticate when jesus loves you the way you are

    5. Competition? This is where evangelicals are actually outdo themselves, as they like to latch onto different new worldly ideas and modify them for their needs. It sometimes may come at the cost of discarding doctrine – but who cares about doctrine when to be “saved” in evangelical christianity you just need to say a Shahada(declaration of faith) that “i accept jesus christ as my lord and savior” – just like in Islam (that Mo is the prophet).

    The speculation about an industrial age in the first or second century AD which Christianity allegedly averted makes about as much sense as if ancient Egypt didn’t collapse we’d all be living in the giant space-travelling pyramids heading for nearest stars. We wuz space vikangs and shiet (makes me think of that lost vikings game of the early 90s!) It is impossible to combine all of Christianity into one-size-fits-all model. As for the reasons of the collapse of the Roman Empire it’ll just take me too much time to research and argument. In brief, i think you give Christianity too much credit for the collapse of the Roman Empire, as most of the 4th century was spend by Christians coming up with a Nicene creed and confronting Arianism(Jesus created & not divine, non-trinitarian), then confronting Nestorianism(Mary mother of Jesus, dyophysitism of Christ etc).

  • Of course. Don’t be ridiculous. Because Tyr(Tiwas,Zeus) was the god of our peopl

    Of course. Don’t be ridiculous. Because Tyr(Tiwas,Zeus) was the god of our people. Odin the god of the aristocracy, Thor(Mars) the Militia (Men). And the Epic Cycle our Mythos. Sol invictus-Mithras didn’t have time to coalesce. Jesus evolved as the god of the weak, slaves, women, and children. Nature’s spirits and ancestors were a hearth religion, our sky-god paganism a social religion, and Christianity was a political religion.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 11:23:00 UTC

  • We can thank Rome…

    —“We can thank Rome for bastardizing the teaching of Christ and merging roman law and administration into religious fiction which became legal fiction 😣”— Justin Coone

    In the end, yes, that’s the problem in a nutshell. Tried to make a jewish middle eastern(occult) supernatural(astrological) government for peasants, women, and slaves (equalitarian), over a european rule of law (empirical), magical metallurgicall), and warrior people (hierarchical) – fracturing the society in exchange for obtaining a clerical and priestly class and egyptian levels of religious rule at the cost of making common people into peasants rather than kinfolk. That’s really what’s lost: making kin into peasants.

  • We can thank Rome…

    —“We can thank Rome for bastardizing the teaching of Christ and merging roman law and administration into religious fiction which became legal fiction 😣”— Justin Coone

    In the end, yes, that’s the problem in a nutshell. Tried to make a jewish middle eastern(occult) supernatural(astrological) government for peasants, women, and slaves (equalitarian), over a european rule of law (empirical), magical metallurgicall), and warrior people (hierarchical) – fracturing the society in exchange for obtaining a clerical and priestly class and egyptian levels of religious rule at the cost of making common people into peasants rather than kinfolk. That’s really what’s lost: making kin into peasants.

  • The First Sermon : Are You Christian as You Claim?

    The First Sermon : Are You Christian as You Claim? https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/23/the-first-sermon-are-you-christian-as-you-claim/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-23 20:41:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253423758217338882

  • The First Sermon : Are You Christian as You Claim?

    —“No good can come from alliance with anti-christs”—

    [T]he question is whether one is “anti” Jesus’ teachings, or “anti” dogmatic text that was added to those teachings by others, or anti those who pretend to follow Jesus but don’t. We follow Jesus by action, and action alone. Whether by faith, tradition, or reason. Or we do not follow Jesus’ actions. Instead, we use the cover of faith for selfish indulgence and unchristian inaction. And your demand for obedience to YOU, to YOUR interpretation of dogmatic text, to YOUR faith in abandoning reason, rather than our faith in tradition of followers of Jesus, our imitation of Jesus, or in our reason about him, is a violation of Jesus’ teaching. It is you who are anti-christ. For you Jesus was a prophet. For some of us he was a philosopher. For others he was a law giver. For others a social scientist. Because each of us differs in how we understand the world, emotionally, rationally, practically, or empirically. And instead of intolerance of those who do not imitate jesus’ teaching of love your neighbor as you love yourself, you are intolerant of others who do not satisfy your selfish demand that others understand the world on your terms. The dogmatically faithful demonstrate loyalty to one another by loyalty to dogma so that together they create a social construction (tribe), so that together they can serve as a social and political FORCE – a resistance movement – against other tools of status signaling: power. It has absolutely nothing to do with loving thy neighbor as you would love yourself – the extension of familial love to kith and kin. It has everything to do with hatred of they neighbor for not adapting to your form of making sense of the world: your selfishness and greed. You either act as Jesus acted and asks us to act toward one another, or you are not christian. You are an activist in a political movement no different from, and no less destructive than, the cancers of judaism and Islam. It is in acting toward one another in large numbers we create the christian peoples that together raise mankind out of perpetual conflict, deceit, mistrust, and the resulting ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality early death and condition of victimhood to a nature all but hostile to our lives. You’re the unchristian anti-christ in your selfishness, greed, and arrogance – you are not the children of god – just petulant children infantilizing each other with the magical thinking of women so thoroughly that you are unable to mature fully into adult men who take material responsibility for the world – and like women you leave it up to those of us who mature into men anyway while you petulantly and arrogantly demand we service you – rather than engage like the rest of us in honest, Christian, voluntary, reciprocity – exchange – regardless of our different means of understanding the world. Many of us do not need ‘training’ like farm animals. We merely need understand that either by the evidence of tradition, and reason, that teaching people to act as did Jesus whether they learn best by ritual, parable, theology, philosophy, tradition, or science, is dependent upon how each of us best learns to regulate our behavior so that we CAN act as Jesus asked. Some of us are filled with continuous emotional sensitivity, fear, and impulses – the child and female biased mind. Some of us have none of it and worry only abut the survival of the tribe – the adult male biased mind – we are informed only by observation, evidence, and reason independent of emotion and impulse. If God made us, he made us different so that we could divide the labor of comprehending the infant, child, teen, adult, and mature, and aged, in male and female conditions, in many different environments, encountering many different challenges, so that TOGETHER we could transcend the animal and evolve into those worthy to sit beside him at his table – converting this world and all worlds in the universe into his eden. Only the infant, the child, and the insecure female mind like that of the domesticated animal herd of sheep, cow, and horse, that want us to be think and feel the same. It is the mature mind that understands that we evolve into packs, and divide the labor of sensing, perceiving, understanding, choosing, negotiating for, coopering on, and completing the tasks of our ascent into godhood, generation by generation, by our differences in understanding – cooperating by the same laws evident in the hand of god: the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, the christian law of love, and the evolutionary law of transcendence into the gods we imagine.