Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • What Is A Non False Religion?

    —“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.

    One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • The Problem

    Feb 28, 2020, 12:00 PM by Predmetsky Rosenborg

    You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    Explaining Anti-Abrahamism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/explaining-anti-abrahamism-2/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:36:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266483692081422337

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    Mar 2, 2020, 9:24 AM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).

    —“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but…

    A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction.

    The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    Mar 2, 2020, 9:24 AM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).

    —“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but…

    A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction.

    The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson

  • “Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    “Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/houre-confusing-anti-semitism-genetics-with-anti-abrahamism-argument/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:27:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266481308361986051

  • “Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    Mar 2, 2020, 1:20 PM You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.

  • “Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    Mar 2, 2020, 1:20 PM You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.