The Consequence of Rejecting Dualism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-consequence-of-rejecting-dualism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:03:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266747010729811970
Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology
-
The Consequence of Rejecting Dualism
Jan 29, 2020, 6:12 PM by Martin Štěpán The “accident of birth” argument falls apart when you reject dualism. I mean that accident of birth implies that it’s an accident your consciousness (soul) got assigned to your body rather that consciousness being produced by the body. So when someone asks me something like: “What if it was you in that situation?”, I respond with: “I am a product of a specific time, place, genetics and experience. It wouldn’t be me in that situation, it would be someone else.”
-
The Consequence of Rejecting Dualism
Jan 29, 2020, 6:12 PM by Martin Štěpán The “accident of birth” argument falls apart when you reject dualism. I mean that accident of birth implies that it’s an accident your consciousness (soul) got assigned to your body rather that consciousness being produced by the body. So when someone asks me something like: “What if it was you in that situation?”, I respond with: “I am a product of a specific time, place, genetics and experience. It wouldn’t be me in that situation, it would be someone else.”
-
monotheistic MONOPOLY religions’ attacks on MARKET religion and norms
monotheistic MONOPOLY religions’ attacks on MARKET religion and norms https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/monotheistic-monopoly-religions-attacks-on-market-religion-and-norms/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:10:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266733608074608641
-
monotheistic MONOPOLY religions’ attacks on MARKET religion and norms
Feb 5, 2020, 7:43 PM The fact that the monotheistic religions’ attacks on market religion and norms (paganism), and the monopoly pseudoscientific attacks on market philosophy and laws, use the same technique of attempting to reverse voluntary markets with involuntary monopoly authority using false promise of life after death or false promise of economic, status, and power rewards after revolution, is a trivial distinction that varies only a subtle alteration of the lie.
-
monotheistic MONOPOLY religions’ attacks on MARKET religion and norms
Feb 5, 2020, 7:43 PM The fact that the monotheistic religions’ attacks on market religion and norms (paganism), and the monopoly pseudoscientific attacks on market philosophy and laws, use the same technique of attempting to reverse voluntary markets with involuntary monopoly authority using false promise of life after death or false promise of economic, status, and power rewards after revolution, is a trivial distinction that varies only a subtle alteration of the lie.
-
Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralize
Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/germanic-religion-in-so-far-it-can-be-called-that-wasnt-in-any-way-centralized/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 23:15:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266508588777955330
-
Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized.
Feb 26, 2020, 12:42 PM Martin Štěpán Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. There was no organization and no book every tribe would have. Every tribe’s version could slowly evolve and diverge, especially if they didn’t come into contact. What we have comes from Iceland written after Christianity was already in place. Even though the gods were shared and Odin does appear to be the head of the pantheon everywhere (Tacitus – central European Germanics, Geoffrey of Monmouth – Saxons) but who knows how the personalities and the stories might have differed. Bill Joslin fight fire with fire, and psychopomp with psychopomp. P, in clarifying the reality of the socio-economic world, turns the wheel of gods, one more rotation back to tyr. law, born of martial culture which domesticates .. a natural response to Fenrir breaking his chains to race across the sky undoing the domestication of our animal nature. Bill Smith This. This is good. Curt. Yeah, Bill has a thing there. That’s a good thing.
-
Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized.
Feb 26, 2020, 12:42 PM Martin Štěpán Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. There was no organization and no book every tribe would have. Every tribe’s version could slowly evolve and diverge, especially if they didn’t come into contact. What we have comes from Iceland written after Christianity was already in place. Even though the gods were shared and Odin does appear to be the head of the pantheon everywhere (Tacitus – central European Germanics, Geoffrey of Monmouth – Saxons) but who knows how the personalities and the stories might have differed. Bill Joslin fight fire with fire, and psychopomp with psychopomp. P, in clarifying the reality of the socio-economic world, turns the wheel of gods, one more rotation back to tyr. law, born of martial culture which domesticates .. a natural response to Fenrir breaking his chains to race across the sky undoing the domestication of our animal nature. Bill Smith This. This is good. Curt. Yeah, Bill has a thing there. That’s a good thing.
-
What Is A Non False Religion?
—“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.
One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.