Performative Religion: actions. Performative Paganism: war against the universe, time, nature, man, and beast.Performative Christianity: the eradication of hatred from the human heart, the extension of familial love to all (or at least kin), and the interpersonal demonstration of forgiveness and charity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-28 11:21:00 UTC
AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Reciprocity/Action) > Science (Truth/Testimony)
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11
AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Reciprocity/Action) > Science (Truth/Testimony)
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-27 23:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1299128252078977032
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1299127217620951041
… And gods laws are not kind. The universe is not made for the benefit of man. If anything, if god made this universe, he made it so that man would serve his interests, which are the continuous evolution of man into godhood. Unfortunately, most religion are anti-god’s plan.
Reply addressees: @strongstate @jamesfoxhiggins
… And gods laws are not kind. The universe is not made for the benefit of man. If anything, if god made this universe, he made it so that man would serve his interests, which are the continuous evolution of man into godhood. Unfortunately, most religion are anti-god’s plan.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-25 16:31:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1298296847543533570
Reply addressees: @strongstate @jamesfoxhiggins
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1298294149008023556
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@strongstate @jamesfoxhiggins Vengeance against god for their genetics, and vengeance against Europeans for our discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe and universe’s god. They hate us as a proxy for hating god. Because we observe god’s laws.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1298294149008023556
( … more)
6) How can we constrain the abrahamic method of “false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, baiting into hazards which reverse the european invesntion of testimonial truth, science, technology, econmics, and medicine, to the production of christian ethics, so that the modern application of the abrahamic method in communism(a christian bias), socialism(a christian bias), neo-marxism(anti-empiricism in social science), postmodernism(anti-empiricism in social construction, relativism), and feminism (anti-adversarialism, a christian bias).
OUR POSITION
The P-position is that if we rule and govern, cooperate, and reason in the visible rules of the universe (the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws), that we can achieve the same goal
The purpose of xianity was, and the purpose of christian activism today remains, the pursuit of communism in mind and body by division of those who can listen, believe, and submit in escape from the physical natural and evolutionary laws – from those who observe, analyze, and transform self man and nature by discovery, adatpation to, and application of those physical natural and evolutionary laws.
The purpose of my work is to discover if we can cooperate physical and material means and ends if we differ on cognitive and emotional means and ends.
If you aren’t discussing this question, then this group has no purpose other than to keep fundamentalism out of the rest of the P-discourse.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 23:57:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747068866243519
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747067266976374
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
The purpose of the Propertarianism and Christians group is to seek compromise and understanding given that some of us can and need to believe and some of us don’t need, and cannot believe. I wanted this group so that I could talk to christians on their terms about this subject. We argue that: 1) What constitutes ‘christianity’ has spawned hundreds of cults and nearly every individual believes he and his or her sect has some monpoly on what is the correct christianity. 2) That this interpretability is a strength and a weakness – it means there is no law of christianity as there is a law of reciprocity, but conversely it means that groups can form on whatever they imagine the bible conveys. This appeals to cognitive biases and suggestion. And that: 1) christian ethics can be reduced to five statements. 2) christianity provides tolerance for the physical natural and evolutionary laws, and can be encoded in law. 3) christian behavior is the optimum solution to the prisonner’s dilemma of social trust – 4) and is the only substantive via-positiva advancement on the natural law of reciprocity. And that: 1) We can write those five statements into natural law for use in our judicial and political system regardless of whether one has a faith, wisdom, or empirical mind to justify those laws and aderhere to them. We ask: 1) Whether the source of causality as auto-deism (mechanical), deism(originary), or theological (activist) god; And; 2) (scripture) Whether the various wisdom literatures: anglo-empirical, germanic contenental, greco-roman, confucian-taoist, buddhist, hindu, and abrahamic (judaism ,christianity, and islam), are just that: wisdom literatures written in the language available to their local people during the ages of transformation – or whether the abrahamic, and in particular, the christian are (a) superior in experence and outcome, (b) and the work of men or supernatural. And; 3) Whether Jesus was an activist (like Alinsky), a philosopher (like Marx), a prophet that supernatural forces spoke through (like Mohammed), or a supernatural creature as xians(Paulians) claim. And; 4) Whether the globalist catholic church which seeks to rule in competition with or defeat of the state; the nationaist orthodox church which seeks to assist and cooperate with the state; or the institutional protestant which seeks to augment the state; or the evangelical protestant which seeks to avoid modernity entirely, are the superior models, is ‘christianity’ – since they all disagree. Or; 5) Whether, we can write the common rules of the christian ethical system into secular empirical law, and prohibit all COMPETING ethical systems – and yes, religions – from our polity. This would allow Fundamentalists, Traditionalists(Deists), Rationalists(Habituals), and empiricicists (scientists like myself) to cooperate in resisting our many enemies, pursuing our christian behavior regardless of the ‘method’ by which we undersetand it. And; (more…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747067266976374
The purpose of the Propertarianism and Christians group is to seek compromise and understanding given that some of us can and need to believe and some of us don’t need, and cannot believe.
I wanted this group so that I could talk to christians on their terms about this subject.
We argue that:
1) What constitutes ‘christianity’ has spawned hundreds of cults and nearly every individual believes he and his or her sect has some monpoly on what is the correct christianity.
2) That this interpretability is a strength and a weakness – it means there is no law of christianity as there is a law of reciprocity, but conversely it means that groups can form on whatever they imagine the bible conveys. This appeals to cognitive biases and suggestion.
And that:
1) christian ethics can be reduced to five statements.
2) christianity provides tolerance for the physical natural and evolutionary laws, and can be encoded in law.
3) christian behavior is the optimum solution to the prisonner’s dilemma of social trust –
4) and is the only substantive via-positiva advancement on the natural law of reciprocity.
And that:
1) We can write those five statements into natural law for use in our judicial and political system regardless of whether one has a faith, wisdom, or empirical mind to justify those laws and aderhere to them.
We ask:
1) Whether the source of causality as auto-deism (mechanical), deism(originary), or theological (activist) god;
And;
2) (scripture) Whether the various wisdom literatures: anglo-empirical, germanic contenental, greco-roman, confucian-taoist, buddhist, hindu, and abrahamic (judaism ,christianity, and islam), are just that: wisdom literatures written in the language available to their local people during the ages of transformation – or whether the abrahamic, and in particular, the christian are (a) superior in experence and outcome, (b) and the work of men or supernatural.
And;
3) Whether Jesus was an activist (like Alinsky), a philosopher (like Marx), a prophet that supernatural forces spoke through (like Mohammed), or a supernatural creature as xians(Paulians) claim.
And;
4) Whether the globalist catholic church which seeks to rule in competition with or defeat of the state; the nationaist orthodox church which seeks to assist and cooperate with the state; or the institutional protestant which seeks to augment the state; or the evangelical protestant which seeks to avoid modernity entirely, are the superior models, is ‘christianity’ – since they all disagree.
Or;
5) Whether, we can write the common rules of the christian ethical system into secular empirical law, and prohibit all COMPETING ethical systems – and yes, religions – from our polity. This would allow Fundamentalists, Traditionalists(Deists), Rationalists(Habituals), and empiricicists (scientists like myself) to cooperate in resisting our many enemies, pursuing our christian behavior regardless of the ‘method’ by which we undersetand it.
And;
(more…)
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 23:56:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747067266976374
CHRISTIANITY OR COMMUNISM? SAME METHOD.
We can make the alternate argument – that christianity was imposed just as authoritarian communism was imposed – and for the same reasons (power).
And that the west survived christianity (communism version one) just as it has nearly survived marxism-neo-marxism-postmodernism-feminism (communism version two).
It’s rather obvious that the christian destruction of the ancient world mirrors the marxist-postmodernist destruction of the modern world – using the very same techniques and strategies, including destruction of churches (temples), taking over the university (new religion), taking over the government administration, and taking over production of proppaganda, by appealing to the underclass.
False promises of xianity in the ancient world by supernatural means and of marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism of the modern world by pseudoscientific and sophomoric means.
When the entire purpose was overthrowing realism, markets, and aristocracy, by a non-productive class from within.
It’s rather obvious that the restoration of aristotle, and the early abandonment of the church, and the increasing restoration of the aristocracy dragged the west out of the dark ages, with christianity once again being a drag on reform just as christians are a drag on my reforms and restorations of aristotelianism and continued expurgation of semitic thought and behavior from the west.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 23:54:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747058876766352
AUTHORITARIAN SUPERNATUAL, DEIST TRADITIONAL, AND SECULAR RATIONAL CHRISTIANITY ARE COMPATIBLE UNDER P-LAW
That religion (even if not supernatural) of some sort is necessary, That christianity produces good behavior, and that Christian ethics are compatible with and an extension of natural law (reciprocity), and that christian forbearance is what makes christan polities successful in transformation into middle class majorities and market civilization capable of democratic process, is all truthful and true.
The great question is whether fundamentalist christians will inhibit the next reformation of christian religion, into one that is scientific, rational, and legal – or whether christians will hold onto their requirement for magical thinking.
My view is that if we express our law in scientific, rational, and operatinal terms, that people will continue to divide into fundamentalist-supernatural (emotional), deist-rational (rational), and legal-scientific (empirical) christians regardless of whether they have the feminine (emotional), neutral (rational) or masculine (legal-scientific) minds.
We know these minds are genetically determined. We know that we seek information structured for our brains to experience.
This (law) is the only solution – a compromise – I know of, that satisfies the wants of everyone, which comes at the cost of annoying empiricists and supernaturalists alike because they want monopolies that conform to their method of thought.
But the european way of life has always been trifunctinoalism mediated by law, and my solution creates again, the european tradition, of trifunctionalism mediated by law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 23:51:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747047137691952
Data is data is data. Catholic west will be gone in a generation. Marxism-Pomo-anti-white is current religion. Unless we find a replacement that is non-false, and ethnocentric, islam will destroy the west like it destroyed the rest.
Reply addressees: @HonorMany