AUTHORITARIAN SUPERNATUAL, DEIST TRADITIONAL, AND SECULAR RATIONAL CHRISTIANITY

AUTHORITARIAN SUPERNATUAL, DEIST TRADITIONAL, AND SECULAR RATIONAL CHRISTIANITY ARE COMPATIBLE UNDER P-LAW

That religion (even if not supernatural) of some sort is necessary, That christianity produces good behavior, and that Christian ethics are compatible with and an extension of natural law (reciprocity), and that christian forbearance is what makes christan polities successful in transformation into middle class majorities and market civilization capable of democratic process, is all truthful and true.

The great question is whether fundamentalist christians will inhibit the next reformation of christian religion, into one that is scientific, rational, and legal – or whether christians will hold onto their requirement for magical thinking.

My view is that if we express our law in scientific, rational, and operatinal terms, that people will continue to divide into fundamentalist-supernatural (emotional), deist-rational (rational), and legal-scientific (empirical) christians regardless of whether they have the feminine (emotional), neutral (rational) or masculine (legal-scientific) minds.

We know these minds are genetically determined. We know that we seek information structured for our brains to experience.

This (law) is the only solution – a compromise – I know of, that satisfies the wants of everyone, which comes at the cost of annoying empiricists and supernaturalists alike because they want monopolies that conform to their method of thought.

But the european way of life has always been trifunctinoalism mediated by law, and my solution creates again, the european tradition, of trifunctionalism mediated by law.