Jesus has a 1500 year record of dark ages from which aryan law, reason, evidence, science, and logic have saved us. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 21:20:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457820391989293058
Reply addressees: @diegocaleiro @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457812351600660480
(…) And they have no one to trust except those folk who talk to them in archaic religious, traditional, or moral prose. Worse, those that do so, are selling failure for money by justifying intuitions that are true with answers that are false.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 19:00:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457785063521746949
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457785060296253443
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The problem with prognostications is that there are very, very, few conservative intellectuals, and fewer of them that specialize in all fields of science, law, economics, and history. So the common folk don’t trust experts who are all biased toward the enemy. (more…) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1456438922406506510
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457785060296253443
I love hippy pagans, new age woo, as long as it’s a voluntary community not an institution with costs of membership. 😉
In fact, going incognito as an artist, living marginally with a bunch of those people is probably the best daily life I can imagine. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 17:21:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457397913710120960
Reply addressees: @TimBeckley3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457396979609178115
9) Abrahamism:
Consists of undermining truth reason probability and evidence by use of False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw-manning, and heaping of
undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to use suggestion and overloading to force individuals, groups, and polities, to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. it’s the same technique used by faith healers, priests, and con artists. And the higher a group’s trust the more susceptible they are to it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 02:27:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233415874967945
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
TERMS: Grammar, Logic, Justification, Sophistry, Pilpul, Critique, Abrahamism 1) Grammar: (a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax. (b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc. (c) Operational grammar: operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’. 2) Logic: the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements. (a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness. 3) Truth: (a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/ (b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary. (c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification. 4) Justification: either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification. 5) Sophistry: (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist. (b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to. 7) Pilpul: (attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image) 8) Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images) (9) MORE IN COMMENTS….
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
Abrahamism: https://t.co/DBNmKftTZP
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679514629722118
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679512163373063
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” https://t.co/BdSBZwc1TY
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679512163373063
And in doing so you demonstrated that I’m correct. That the Female->Abrahamic method of argument is endemic in jewish-christian-muslim, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodern, libertarian, neoconservative, feminist, pc-woke discourses.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 16:39:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456662396731281412
Reply addressees: @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456661857591300103
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41 You didn’t ask me to make an argument. You stated I was wrong and a sophist. You engaged in intellectual dishonesty by using rallying shaming and reputation destruction to generate demand for self-defense using the pretense of knowledge you didn’t have. ie: a crime of fraud.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456661857591300103
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Religions trained these things prior to their collapse into irrelevance. We know it can be done.
Can it…
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 21:24:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456371703295135745
THE SUCCESS OF CHRISTIANITY IN PRODUCING MINDFULNESS AND HAPPINESS
No matter where you sit on the religion question, you have to come to terms with the fact that christianity worked, and still works, and produces the happiest people and families, while marxism and identity-marxism(pomo-pc-woke) produces the opposite, and secular humanism rides in the middle.
The open question is can we reform christianity as we had under the byzantines, under augustine, under aquinas, despite the failure of the vatican reforms?
Yes, we can. Because whether god is existential, emergent, or metaphorical, and whether jesus is prophet, philosopher, or social scientist, the result is the same. All that differs is whether you’re unchristian enough to demand others ‘believe’ the way you do, instead of produce the same behavior regardless of beliefs.
I am loyal to fundamentalist christians. I don’t ‘believe’ like they do. I don’t need faith. For me it’s just science, and the large variation in human cognition between intuiition, imagination and reason.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 18:01:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107220100367455173
In the sense that tolkein inserted christian love , you’re correct. Even if he didn’t want to. He inserted Christian good vs evil, instead of order(good) vs chaos(bad). And he avoided the brutality of our ancient ancestors, replacing it with Christian conviction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:27:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456297165203066882
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir @philanthropic89
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456296609118048257
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@aldafa_ir @philanthropic89 In his mind he was giving us the mythology of the anglo saxon prior to the norman conquest. Giving us our ‘lost mythology and religin’. That’s why tolkien is so desirable. the question is can we teach enough history econ law to restore possibility of that ‘religion’ of ‘us’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456296609118048257
In his mind he was giving us the mythology of the anglo saxon prior to the norman conquest. Giving us our ‘lost mythology and religin’. That’s why tolkien is so desirable. the question is can we teach enough history econ law to restore possibility of that ‘religion’ of ‘us’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:25:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456296609118048257
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir @philanthropic89
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456296279214940163