Is that why? Or is it a failure of republicans to abandon Christian wishful thinking about the nature and malleability of man, and their hope-as-cope that there is any alternative to genetic determinism and malthusian constraint?
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 23:27:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446255792785592325
Reply addressees: @DrPenguinmd @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446254417309798400
England is at war by war by other means – the weaponization of the female means of anti-social behavior, scaled to destruction of the institutions of genetic, cultural, and civilizational construction.
We call it marxism, neo-marxism, pomo, pc-woke – anti-west, white, and male.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 23:12:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446252080168153093
Reply addressees: @BillCor26578964
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446239943769088004
Are you claiming congressional subpeonas are not acts of corruption? 😉 That members of congress, their parties, their staffs, their party apparatus, the special interests that fund them and do most of their work are free of corruption? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 22:42:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446244594077810700
Reply addressees: @freeulysses_tj @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446242615637196805
A LITTLE POSITIVE FEEDBACK FOR THE FASICSTS IN THE AUDIENCE
watch nerds avoid stating the obvious: that china chose fascism, and fascism won
youtube.com/watch?v=LrbRUdM_800
MY COMMENT:
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 22:10:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107062535224545546
WATCH NERDS AVOID STATING THE OBVIOUS: THAT CHINA CHOSE FASCISM, AND FASCISM WON
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrbRUdM_800
(My comment below) https://t.co/SMwSvhTcMQ
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 22:07:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446235715566809094
(Agreed. My hope was that we could gain control and scale, but I think the window is closing as fast as the mainstream realization of the unsurvivability of the left’s false promises, and the right’s false hope.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 21:19:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446223609039671299
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446223177630224387
Resistance to corruption isn’t obstruction of justice, but injustice. The weaponization of the deep state against the middle class and its defenders is going to end one way or another. At least with trump we had a chance of doing it without a civil war.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 20:57:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446218147112046594
Reply addressees: @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446161649673572360
wrong question. ideal not real. The question is, what victory conditions are possible with the population and resources we have? Everything else is larping. (All you well-intentioned folks LARP, largely because you don’t have the experience to work by more sophisticated means.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 18:56:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446187741868331012
Reply addressees: @ProblematicPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446187375303004160
Monopoly thinking. Looking to the past. These things have failed not for lack of demonstrated militarism, but for excess feminism.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 18:43:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446184494780796929
Reply addressees: @ProblematicPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446184167092461568
ie; you’re trying to frame a preferential good as a universal good – which is the scam everyone plays with everyone else.
It’s a political good because it’s only possible as a political good. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 18:34:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446182251230908424
Reply addressees: @ProblematicPol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446175074701266948