Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

GOOD THOUGHTS. My response:

@sakovkt No idea why a church matters. It’s irrelevent other than as an educational institution – and it’s been captured by a leftist educational institution that is hostile to the west.

What matters is that our Law (logic), Constitution (contract), Institutions (organizations), policies (goals) under that constitution in those institutions, and our legislation, regulation, and insurance of those policies (actions) bias in favor the the production of the hierarchy of intergenerational family > craft > business > industry > and economy, such that the polity persists in a condition of prosperity and safety from competitors.

We study everything EXCEPT law, when it is law, not religion or philosopy that is the foundation of the unique hyper adaptability of the west, and the reason for the stagnation and decline of the rest. Science is just the application of legal inquiry and decidability to all of man and nature.

It is our law that gave us reason, empiricism, science, tecnology, medicing, and the mst rapidly evolving civilization in history, and the only one that escaped agrarian stagnation.

Church morality and mindfulness for children, history and reason for youth, science and calculation for young adults, competition via economics for adults, and politics law and war for the best and wisest adults (Generalization), and pure mathematics and scientific research for the outliers (Specialization). This is the natural progression of one’s knowledge and agency in relation to one’s cognitive capacity.

We need to restore monarchy (head of the people), nobility (head of a region of people), lesser nobility (head of localities), heads of families (the smallest political order) – but we must understand that the weakness of aristocratic inheritance is the need for ‘hiring specialist’, and limigint the nobility to ‘veto’ – which takes advantage of their intergenerational self interests and intersets for the people – while limiting their input to veto, and letting the people, the market, and the cabinets (management) determine wants and demands and means, within the limits of intergenerational persistence.

In other words, the british had it right, adams had it right, and jefferson was enamoroed of the french, made a mistake. Had washington accepted the monarchy instead of refusing it, we would have improved on the english model in institutions. As such we only improved on it by writing down the constitution and the law.

My work continues that process of ‘finishing’ the aryan rule of law, and christian civic love as a formal logic that is closed to ‘intepretation and abuse’ as is every other physical science.

We can restore the west, but to do so we must separate fact from fiction, and evidence from intuition, and understand we must reform our constitution, our govenrment, our institutions, our policies, and yes, our religion, so that it is as ‘true’ as the physical sciences. Because that is what rule of law is.