Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “Q: CURT, HAS RUSSIA GONE RED AGAIN?” (a) the west is seen as decadent and in de

    “Q: CURT, HAS RUSSIA GONE RED AGAIN?”

    (a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the world. And a visit to america, or just viewing american streets on google maps will confirm that without much difficulty.

    (b) russians are frustrated because their economy was growing until 2014, but the consequences of handling the ukrainian revolution poorly have affected them disproportionately. Worse, all capital is being directed to moscow and st petersburg at the expense of the distant regions. (Again, this is a ‘gamble’ the russian government is taking, given that they expect a rapid collapse of the west – especially europe – witihn the near time horizon as demographic collapse hurts europe more so than the rest of the world.

    (c) the entire world is economically equilibrating ending 600 years of european advantage in genetic destribution, institutions, culture, science, and technology, so the entire world will gravitate toward greater state responsibility for the economic condition – which is what we mean by socialism – since socialism always fails, it simply means are more mixed economy favoring state protection of labor markets and prices.

    (d) We know what the future looks like and china has taught a very serious and uncomfortable lesson: the chinese are fascists not communists. They are imitating the national socialists not the communists, in every aspect of their society. IN doing so they are demonstrating that the fascists won the argument over the future economic model. Why? Because nationalism, ethonocentrism, heavy trade regulation, state as majority venture capitalism, and private sector as majority producer, is the optimum political model. The only difference is the degree of propaganda necessary to maintain the loyalty of the people to one another (nationalism, ethnocentrism), in proportion to the amount of stress that the people must endure while policy slowly take effect.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 17:28:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107231295626670588

  • @YeahIStillTrade @Rhodok Imagine youi’re in control of the treasury, the central

    @YeahIStillTrade @Rhodok Imagine youi’re in control of the treasury, the central bank,** the IRS, the treasury agents, the FBI, the banking, wire transfer, credit card system, the stock and bond markets, the telcos, and the ISPs. And you want collapse the value of BTC and drive it into an exclusively criminal means of payment. How would you do that? Easily. And then easily force other governments to do so or be cut out of the system.**

    And in response to your questions:
    (a) it doesn’t matter if you can’t convert btc into anything material (b) they don’t care if you leave – they’d prefer it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 17:20:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107231262366771206

  • I’m not sure it’s ‘against us’ in the long run, any more than paper money (scrip

    I’m not sure it’s ‘against us’ in the long run, any more than paper money (script) was against us. It’s just tech. You use tech well or badly. The problem is always constraining government from acting badly. And that’s problem of creating market for prosecution of state actors.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 15:03:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457000715658924054

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457000219967639559

  • @Travis_Hawks No. We understood. We would have ‘won’ but for immigration. What w

    @Travis_Hawks No. We understood. We would have ‘won’ but for immigration. What we didn’t see was immigration+pc-woke together.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 12:27:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107230111011135295

  • WHY LEFT INTUITION?

    WHY LEFT INTUITION?

    WHY LEFT INTUITION? https://t.co/1XGMzENIpn


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 23:39:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456768038901067776

  • Don’t you wish we had a president that could field questions from the audience l

    Don’t you wish we had a president that could field questions from the audience like Putin? (Admittedly, limiting such questions to ‘questions’ rather than accusations and slander.) We have no world leaders other than putin that are competent to field questions. (Maybe Bibi?)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:29:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456644738451480580

  • RUSSIAN OPINION (a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the w

    RUSSIAN OPINION

    (a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the world. And a visit to america, or just viewing american streets on google maps will confirm that without much difficulty.

    (b) russians are frustrated because their economy was growing until 2014, but the consequences of handling the ukrainian revolution poorly have affected them disproportionately. Worse, all capital is being directed to moscow and st petersburg at the expense of the distant regions. (Again, this is a ‘gamble’ the russian government is taking, given that they expect a rapid collapse of the west – especially europe – witihn the near time horizon as demographic collapse hurts europe more so than the rest of the world.

    (c) the entire world is economically equilibrating ending 600 years of european advantage in genetic destribution, institutions, culture, science, and technology, so the entire world will gravitate toward greater state responsibility for the economic condition – which is what we mean by socialism – since socialism always fails, it simply means are more mixed economy favoring state protection of labor markets and prices.

    (d) We know what the future looks like and china has taught a very serious and uncomfortable lesson: the chinese are fascists not communists. They are imitating the national socialists not the communists, in every aspect of their society. IN doing so they are demonstrating that the fascists won the argument over the future economic model. Why? Because nationalism, ethonocentrism, heavy trade regulation, state as majority venture capitalism, and private sector as majority producer, is the optimum political model. The only difference is the degree of propaganda necessary to maintain the loyalty of the people to one another (nationalism, ethnocentrism), in proportion to the amount of stress that the people must endure while policy slowly take effect.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:23:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225142902208525

  • Boost of @Stanleymitchell90 In America you have the White party, and the anti-Wh

    Boost of @Stanleymitchell90 In America you have the White party, and the anti-White party.

    The main difference is the White party is in denial about who they represent, and the anti-White party isn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:51:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225227049307022

  • Its very interesting how the little people presume that grownup world operates o

    Its very interesting how the little people presume that grownup world operates on scales they understand. It doesn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 07:00:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456516763986845697

    Reply addressees: @thegreatduggo @Loveon999 @Redrum_of_Crows

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456487161038098458

  • Indirectly. Realistically they poison every political movement, every potential

    Indirectly. Realistically they poison every political movement, every potential leader, every conversation, meeting, rally, protest. They drag everyone into the crab bucket of failure. They are shallow and impulsive losers. Only the ‘middle’ can save them. So only middle matters.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:28:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456463301232242688

    Reply addressees: @DioCarv

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456460982214144000