Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • An Ideology: Any reasonably coherent set of social, cultural, moral and politica

    An Ideology: Any reasonably coherent set of social, cultural, moral and political ideas that can be used to obtain and hold political power on the behalf of a part of a population that perceives it has similar interests. Monarchy needs a sufficient ideological base. The people have abandoned the church. The church has abandoned christendom. Economics has replaced cultural nationalism, and empirical tools have replaced the moral sentiments. For monarchy to prevail in the post-mystical age, we must remake it’s foundations so that they rely upon economic and cultural superiorities, not desire to return to the past.

    Monarchs are superior to elected ministers because they have a longer time preference, and with a longer time preference they can more wisely veto those changes which will, in the long term, harm the society – because they are not subject to the fashions of the people.

    There are three basic western philosophical traditions: 1) Aristocratic and Conservative with the longest time preference. 2) Middle Class and Classical Liberal with medium time preference 3) Proletarian and socialist with short time preference. These three philosophies loosely correspond to social class sentiments and perceptions of social order. THey also loosely correspond to the Monarchy, the Senate, and House of Commons. The insight of the british model was to give each social class it’s house, and to force the houses to collaborate in order to enact laws.

    This model was sufficient until the american and french revolutions attempted to break the class model and transfer full power to either the middle or lower classes. And was further exacerbated by the Russian and chinese revolutions which (regrettably) succeeded in transferring political power to the proletariat. After the world wars, Europe was broken and rejected the aristocratic model entirely. (Wrongly. Germany was right. German social order is the most economically productive yet discovered because it mobilizes the working class to produce quality exports.) Instead, governments sought solace in socialist doctrine and universal enfranchisement, while authoritarian and military control was absorbed by the Americans along with the British navy and port system. Americans used this period of economic prosperity to assert their inherited global military power to undermine communism – successfully, but is not largely bankrupt and unable to fund it’s existing military structure as well as it’s redistributionist benefit system. Instead, Americans export debt instead of taxing other countries, and they use that debt to finance the cost of running the world trade system. Unfortunately, in the process of running the empire, Americans have now become a fractured society, with race, culture and class divisions, as well as somewhere between four and ten different ‘nations’ within the USA, operating under the administration of an international imperial government. The US economy is now so dependent upon the value of the dollar, and the use of military force to determine the means by which trade is administered, that the citizenry will suffer if these obligations are reduced.

    This series of events shows the danger of empire building, whether it is done on purpose as in the case of Britain defending herself from spain and france, or by accident, in the case of the USA, trying to maintain stability during and after the war period.

    The optimum government must reflect the class structure of society in one way or another, so that the classes that do exist can use the government to cooperate rather than regress into class warfare.

    A constitution enumerating the specific powers of the government. A hereditary monarch with veto power. A senate of commerce and banking whose members must meet rigid criteria, and who are chosen by lottery. A house of redistribution that is democratically elected. An independent judiciary operating on the common law. And most importantly, 1) issuing loans not laws – loans are calculable and forecastable. 2) the senate borrowing money from the house and repaying interest for use in redistribution to the house, 3) the privatization of all offices of government, so that a bureaucracy cannot form and seize power. 4) electronic presentation of all house legislation, and direct democratic voting on individual bills. 5) Immigration requires cultural assimilation and language adoption, as well as purchased right of entry, and accountable sponsorship of the individual. 6) The return of the majority of political power to the states, and the limitation of the federal government to money, insurance, and defense. 7) the right of nullification and secession is inviolate.

    Money, Insurance, War are global but all trade and culture is local. — And that’s how people want it. Classes exist and in any society will either cooperate and prosper, or in conflict, they will undermine that society and it’s government.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-12 15:18:00 UTC

  • the currencies. Then the monarchies. …. I can have hope, can’t i?

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,761201,00.htmlFirst the currencies. Then the monarchies. …. I can have hope, can’t i?


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 12:58:00 UTC

  • some positive sentiment toward monarchy. I wish we had kings and queens again. “

    http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/buruma50/EnglishFinally, some positive sentiment toward monarchy. I wish we had kings and queens again. “Monarchy: In case of upheaval, break glass, install monarch, rebuild your society..” Monarchy is the only form of government humans fully understand. It is the most successful and most durable form of government that the world has ever known. Democracy is ‘The God That Failed’.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 12:57:00 UTC

  • “No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.” — Finally. Dead. By Navy S

    “No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.” — Finally. Dead. By Navy Seals.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-02 06:16:00 UTC

  • What Would You Learn From A Lifetime Of Studying Politics And Economics?

    Fundamentally, assuming you were intellectually honest, if you were to spend the next twenty years of your life studying political science, with the goal of long term stability and prosperity, then you would come to these conclusions:

    • The Problem

        a) Time:
        b) Space (distribution):
        d) Acting:
        c) Choosing an Action:
        d) Memory:
        e) Limited Knowledge:
        f) Planning:
        g) Opportunity Costs:
        h) Learning (imitation):
        i) Choosing What To Learn (Alphas)
      • Mankind:
        • The Genders:
        • Society
          • A Society is it’s Market
          • Productivity
        • Institutions:
          • Cultural-Forgone Opportunities:
          • Time Preference
          • Suppression Of Corruption
          • A System Of Property Definitions
          • Metaphysical Objectives
          • Administrative and Procedural:
          • Cooperative Institutions
          • Meritocratic Rotation of Elites / Denial Of Non Meritocratic Access:
          • Recognizing New Rules
          • Coordinating Of Group Investments:
          • Means Of Resolving Differences:
          • Limits On Power
        • Government:
        • hereditary monarch
        • aristocracy
        • democratically elected common house
          • Monarchy:
        • Rule Of Law:
          • Redistribution:

            7) Failure: Governments and empires fail for these reasons:

            • Debasement:
            • Overextension:
            • Birth Rates:
            • Money:
            • Trade Routes:
            • Calculative Institutions:
            • Irrationalism:
            • Cultural Habits/Opportunity Costs:
            • Externalities:
            • Disasters:

            8) Three Types Of Coercion

              9) Social and Economic Classes 10) Human Failure:

                11) Failures Of Political Discourse a) the multitude of transfers 12) The Hierarchy Of Argument

                  13) Personal Ethics a) Speak The Truth, and at worst say nothing b) Do Nothing To Others You Would Not Want Done Unto You c) Engage in no exchange wherein the other party will ever regret his purchase. 15) Social Problems In Advanced Society a) The Loneliness and Anonymity Of The Division Of Labor and The Affect On Society b) The Difference Between The Urban And The Rural c) The Status Competition Between Groups who will seek political power to alter their condition. The utility of different governments can be determined by historical analogy, by articulated reason, by empirical study of economic performance, and by demonstrated stability against revolution, adaptability to external shocks, and the temporal duration of the system of rules itself. Under those criteria, only the class-tiered system of government survives scrutiny. In particular, democratic governments are temporary, and the result of extraordinary wealth created by conquest of new territory or trade routes. And totalitarian governments are impoverishing, regardless of circumstances. It is the combination of all forms of government so that the different social classes have institutions wich allow them to achieve their ends without detriment to the institutions of the society that is superior to forms of government that reflect the desires ONLY of certain classes of society. Our western error has been that we feel we must enfranchise everyone into the same structure without accounting for differences in our knowledge, skill, ability and preferences. Unfortunately, the horrors of the world wars caused westerners to question their civilization’s principles, rather than the rate of technological evolution and the rate of population growth, and our inability to EXTEND our system of western government fast enough to accomodate them, and instead we have, quite wrongly, thrown out the entire system rather than improving it by ADDING to our rather empirical system of government. The consequences of marxian collectivism, coinciding with feminism, the debate over slavery, and the immigration of non-western people’s, was far greater than our system could tolerate. And the reason our system could not tolerate it, was because we were still relying too much on moral religious doctrine rather than fully articulated reason: we simply did not understand the reasons our western form of government was superior.

                • “If instead, our government operated as a bank and insurance company, it would b

                  “If instead, our government operated as a bank and insurance company, it would be empirical, calculative and specific rather than rational and deliberative, and general. As such, it would be far less easy to rely upon supposedly moral arguments, that are in effect, universally, without exception, forms of deception or convenient rationalizations and justifications for either theft, class warfare, or corruption.”


                  Source date (UTC): 2011-04-18 11:47:00 UTC

                • “Weber believed that that Marx’s description of alienation had little to do with

                  “Weber believed that that Marx’s description of alienation had little to do with capitalism, but was a consequence of industrialism and bureaucracy.”

                  People don’t hate government per se. They hate bureaucracy whether it’s in the government, in our large businesses, or in our entertainment. Organization is synonymous with Bureaucracy which is synonymous with Oligarchy.

                  Privatize everything.


                  Source date (UTC): 2011-04-14 19:53:00 UTC

                • Governments Should Be Empirical Not Moral

                  All societies in history, without exception, appear to have a ‘referee’ or ‘judge’ — usually an elder male. This topic has been researched to death: Egalitarian tribal warfare societies have some elder male. Chieftain societies tend to concentrate decision making power. Urban societies develop specialists. Advanced civilizations have micro-specialists (judges). Likewise, as they grow, societies also develop specialists for extra-group conflict resolution (warriors), and specialists for in-group conflict resolution (politicians). It is impossible to have a peaceful and prosperous society without conflict resolution because planning and risk taking necessary for production become impossible. If we continue our evolution into industrialization, market economies become so much more productive than any other in history, that shareholders (people who pay the cost of adhering to norms and rules) desire returns on their investment in that society via conformity.

                  [callout] If instead, our government operated as a bank and insurance company, it would be empirical, calculative and specific rather than rational and deliberative, and general. As such, it would be far less easy to rely upon supposedly moral arguments, that are in effect, universally, without exception, forms of deception or convenient rationalizations and justifications for either theft, class warfare, or corruption.[/callout]

                  The problem for social scientists, and the citizenry, is not the rational constitution of, and methods used by these different specialists in conflict resolution. The problems are the coordination of their activities, the setting of priorities, and the limits on their privatization of opportunities (corruption), as roles filled by individuals evolve into institutions and then into methodological, self interested bureaucracies. In the private sector we use prices, money and accounting and contracts to coordinate our activities – they are empirical. Instead, the bureaucracies coordinate their activities using laws, regulations and rules – and laws and rules are insufficiently granular and empirical for the size and complexity of our current population sizes and the resulting complexity of our devision of knowledge and labor (instead their moderately rational, which is less precise, and more reliant on interpretation). This is the problem with the rule of law – the formal principle for any law is that it must apply to all people equally in order to protect the citizenry from overreach. It is by definition and necessity a GENERAL rather than SPECIFIC tool. If instead, our government operated as a bank and insurance company, it would be empirical, calculative and specific rather than rational and deliberative, and general. As such, it would be far less easy to rely upon supposedly moral arguments, that are in effect, universally, without exception, forms of deception or convenient rationalizations and justifications for either theft, class warfare, or corruption. This is the hole in our philosophy of government. (It is the hole some of us are trying desperately to fill with a solution.)

                • it further implies that political freedom is a ‘good’ – when, it’s evident from

                  http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=2467″And it further implies that political freedom is a ‘good’ – when, it’s evident from the record of history that personal freedom is absolutely a good, but political freedom is simply a necessary evil in order to prevent the government from forming a predatory bureaucracy, and treating the population as it’s property.”


                  Source date (UTC): 2011-04-04 11:48:00 UTC

                • “Sometimes, the words of political leaders requires interpretation beyond face v

                  “Sometimes, the words of political leaders requires interpretation beyond face value. In Russia’s case, abstention (from the vote on Libya) was a calculated move to *facilitate* intervention. The subsequent instability could eliminate Libya as an oil & gas alternative, thus giving Moscow greater market share – and greater control – in Europe. Making sense now?” – STRATFOR


                  Source date (UTC): 2011-03-30 10:03:00 UTC