HOPPE: DEMOCRACY IS THE SLOW ROAD TO COMMUNISM
Source date (UTC): 2012-12-02 18:00:00 UTC
HOPPE: DEMOCRACY IS THE SLOW ROAD TO COMMUNISM
Source date (UTC): 2012-12-02 18:00:00 UTC
http://cnsnews.com/blog/patrick-j-buchanan/stirrings-secessionBUCHANNAN ON SECESSION
Source date (UTC): 2012-12-01 02:25:00 UTC
CONSERVATIVE STRATEGY
The conservative strategy has been 1) to ally with Christians and the wealthy to oppose the expansion of the non meritocratic, non-proportional, anti-nuclear family, anti aristocratic, anti decentralized, secular socialist state. 2). To force the bankruptcy of the intertemporally redistributive fiat money state before the social capital of the aristocratic European model in American civic society is expended, and the nuclear family, the protestant ethic and all it entails are bankrupted. In the sense that social capital consisting of norms is as valuable or more so than money capital and built capital. Which is true given that Protestants have created the only high trust societies.
The strategy is not to get the rich richer for their own sake. But to pay the rich to oppose the expansion of the socialist state.
Marketing campaigns, slogans, and silly phrases being what they are, they obscure the complex and rational content of political strategies.
And that is the purpose of ideology: to motivate, not educate.
Source date (UTC): 2012-12-01 02:23:00 UTC
http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/size-nations#.ULl0k5CpEjE.facebookTHE SIZE OF NATIONS
I argue in favor of small countries (not states) for simple reasons:
1) the high trust normative economy can develop with lowest transaction costs.
2) Government’s emphasis is on selection of priorities using scarce resources, not profiting and expanding from conflict resolution between opposing minorities.
3) Societies are more egalitarian when norms are homogenous.
4) It is extremely difficult for small states to conduct war because they have limited access to credit via fiat money.
5) They are better, happier, places to live. (the USA is still living off it’s stored social capital that peaked with the baby boom. Although that’s just about depleted.)
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-30 22:16:00 UTC
FISCAL CLIFF DEMANDS
I’ve been saying this for years and I’ll say it again this time:
In exchange for taxes require the DoEd, HUD and Energy shuttered. That’s enough.
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-30 11:02:00 UTC
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/a-time-for-more-nations/SECESSION MOVEMENT : A TIME FOR MORE COUNTRIES
Rebuild Civic Society : Break Up The USA
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-29 01:05:00 UTC
http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/size-nations#.ULb5_zTaR9Y.facebookGREAT READS : SMALL HOMOGENOUS STATES ARE BEST FOR ALL
A large state does nothing but allow greater debt, and greater debt both warfare, bad policy, corruption, and bad norms. Now, if we could just get it across that monarchy is superior to democracy.
Break Up The United States.
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-29 01:03:00 UTC
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/republicans-mourning-mitt-romney/story?id=17742687FUNNY: POLITICS
Conservatives eat their dead. Progressives resurrect them, and rewrite both memories and history to suit consensus.
Conservatism is aristocracy. Aristocracy is meritocracy. Meritocracy is objective.
Even if its language is allegorical.
There is a difference between arguments and actions. Of the two arguments are less scientific than actions. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 08:36:00 UTC
THE RATIONALITY OF THE CONSERVATIVE POSITION ON EDUCATION
The conservative argument is a) that our children spend more time being indoctrinated into socialism than they are educated. (true after 5th grade) b) that the teachers union blocks reforms to the process, putting teachers above students. (demonstrably true in all cases) c) that we spend more than anyone else and get poorer academic results (the data shows this to be true) d) that we have lost competitiveness in the working and lower classes because of all of these factors, and this has endangered the privileged position of the american economy. (demonstrably true) e) that it is not possible for people with traditional values to avoid oppression of their values by the socialist state. (certainly true)
ALL of these are legitimate concerns supported by the data. They are not wrong to hold these values. It might be argued that the political necessity of overcoming the difficulty of mixing races, cultures and values is so costly and difficult that we must bear these costs at the expense of our economic privilege. But that is a preference, not a truth.
The conservatives hold a different preference: the competitiveness of the tribe. They have a broader moral code (see Haidt) that takes into consideration more variables. They value normative capital more highly. And they hold these values at the expense of the individual, and tolerate the consequences of proportionality (meritocracy) in favor of its benefits. They are not irrational, emotional, or cruel. They simply have additional considerations beyond simple maternal caretaking.
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-06 02:19:00 UTC
“THE POLARIZED STATES OF AMERICA”
Why don’t we put that on our money instead?
Source date (UTC): 2012-11-04 05:11:00 UTC