Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT RAMZPAUL’S POINTS 1) The Counter-Enlightenment was tak

    https://gloria.tv/media/7TcJehsj2GJRAMZPAUL ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT

    RAMZPAUL’S POINTS

    1) The Counter-Enlightenment was taken already. But this is a counter-enlightenment movement. The Dark Enlightenment. (I disagree with conflating the dark ages and the middle ages. Western civic society is largely the result of the late middle ages, not dark ages.)

    2) The Cathedral includes the Academy, The Media, The State, The Deep State.

    3) The Religion of the Cathedral is Cultural Marxism : Having failed scientifically (Scientific Socialism), Having failed organizationally (Syndicalism), Having failed through Postmodernism (lying) AND having started with demand for access to opportunity, expanded their demands to equality of opportunity, and having expanded their demands to equality of outcome, and failing because of the empirical difference in ability between individuals, the only solution was to import vast numbers of underclass people from the third world, encourage single motherhood, destroy the family, and create dependence upon the state sufficient that the state could take control of all functions in life.

    3) Red Pill : Accepting the truth of the evidence of man’s behavior and abandoning the enlightenment fallacies.

    4) Inequality and Diversity: People are empirically unequal, and Diversity empirically decreases trust and increases demand for tyranny. (The reason we are unequal is largely the difference in rates of reproduction of our classes. While homo-sapiens of the various races are similar, we vary in the success at suppressing our underclass reproduction. Those who succeed have advanced societies, and those who failed have impoverished societies. The cold solved this problem for us. The underclasses are a problem. Everywhere and always.)

    5) Democracy: Democracy is the worst possible system because it is dependent upon lies not reality or scientific reality, and surrenders control to the lower classes and elites who pander to them.

    CURT DOOLITTLE’S EXPLANATIONS

    The purpose of the enlightenment

    0) To end the Aristocratic Rule of the Landed Monarchies, and the Landed Church.

    1) To justify the middle class takeover of government (means of producing commons) from the landed aristocracy.

    2) To justify the diminution of religion and religious mysticism in favor of science and reason, assisting in the middle class takeover of the government.

    The Fallacy of the Enlightenment

    1) That it was possible to create an aristocracy of everyone. It’s not possible because meritocracy is not in the interest of the underclasses. Parasitism is.

    The Institutional Error

    1) Instead of creating a new house for the middle class, and then a new house for proletarians, which would have made it possible for classes to conduct exchanges, we created a single house with majority rule and as a consequence, found that the lower classes, and women in particular had no interest in the aristocracy everyone, and instead, voted to incrementally destroy the aristocratic civilization we call ‘the west’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 13:51:00 UTC

  • Chuck. This was done with intent. To undermine our high trust society and create

    Chuck. This was done with intent. To undermine our high trust society and create demand for authority.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 12:50:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/624924561482620928

    Reply addressees: @ltsChuckBass @Jen_J_Smith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/624310328940040193


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/624310328940040193

  • THE DESTROYERS OF TRUTH AND TRUST —“That’s where the Politically Correct -sham

    THE DESTROYERS OF TRUTH AND TRUST

    —“That’s where the Politically Correct -shaming comes in. Making sure those that are not susceptible to lies are still brought under control by fear of social ostracism, loss of loved ones, deprivation of income and so on. The [progressives], and they are bastards, make even acknowledging the truth very expensive. “— James Santagata

    They destroy truth to destroy trust, to create demand for authoritarianism in order to resolve conflicts, that could be resolved by truth, and as a consequence to organize society according to their will.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 12:25:00 UTC

  • THE BATTLE WE FACE TODAY: (important piece) I know I’m not the first person to s

    THE BATTLE WE FACE TODAY:

    (important piece)

    I know I’m not the first person to say this, but it’s pretty clear that Russia is not only the ultimate expression of postmodernism (lying), but that it evolved to this state by reforming jewish strategy, philosophy, and law: destroy the trust of the outsiders in order to create demand for authority and group cohesion, thereby creating opportunity for predation.

    While the founders of Russia were disproportionately jewish, and while their secret service was disproportionately jewish, what is more important is that the jewish strategy was useful for the Mongolian/Tatar/Islamic authoritarianism that is the source of Russian political culture. Russia combines ‘white’ people, Steppe totalitarianism, and jewish deceit (propaganda) as the complete economic, social, political and martial expression of the jewish strategy: destroy the higher trust societies and create demand for authority, and create opportunity for predation.

    If we go back through history and see the success of lying created through zoroastrian monotheism: jewish, it’s revolutionary reformation: christianity, and it’s counter-revolutionary authoritarianism: Islamism, then it’s modern branches in Marxism, Western Postmodernism, Russian secular judaism, and anglo progressive pseudoscience and outright lying, then

    We can not only cure ourselves, but we can disarm the world: TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    The Truthful and Trusting society may not be the end of history, but social democracy is certainly not.

    There are three means of production of commons:

    – Truthful and Trustful (libertarian: rule of law, civic society)

    – Pragmatic and Utilitarian (social democracy)

    – Deceitful and Parasitic (authoritarianism)

    We have focused our efforts too long on the economy. Consumer capitalism has won the battle for the production of goods and services. We no longer fight that battle. And focusing our efforts on it is a waste of energy. We won not by arguments but by resisting the state long enough so that the logically obvious could result in the empirically demonstrable: the voluntary organization of production is the only successful technology for the production of consumer goods and services.

    Instead of the battle for a voluntary economy, the battle we face today is the suppression of parasitism in central bureaucracy and the expansion of trust and thereby increase of economic velocity.

    We must create a non-parasitic voluntary production of commons just as we created a non-parasitic voluntary production of goods and services.

    At present there is only one way we know of by which to destroy all parasitism, increase trust, increase economic velocity, increase prosperity, ad therefore increase choices. That is universal standing under the common law, the legal prohibition of parasitism, by mutual insurance: the exchange of guarantee of defense and restitution of property-en-toto.

    But we must also provide for the construction of commons by voluntary means, by changing what is currently a monopoly constructed by majority ascent into a market wherein any non-parasitic exchange between the classes, or objective of the classes can be constructed.

    We succeeded in transforming humanity into the voluntary organization of production of goods and services we call consumer capitalism.

    Our next mission – purely out of self defense – is to transform our government into a voluntary organization of commons.

    This project is eminently possible. It will forever render the corporeal state to the dustbin of antiquity, categorically relegated to another attempt at pseudoscience for the purpose of pure power accumulation and nothing more.

    We have a very simple mission then. To reform every possible constitution such that the judiciary shall prohibit all parasitism without exception. And that the provision of commons be one of adjudication of differences, not of ascent. And that the defense of the realm be the province of every man, under universal standing under the common law.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 11:13:00 UTC

  • QUESTION: How successful are the french and german educational systems in perfor

    QUESTION: How successful are the french and german educational systems in performing class sortition ostensibly by demonstrated merit?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 09:09:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRACY (PATRIARCHY) IS A CRITICAL RESPONSIBILTY: WE SET LIMITS. WE DON’T EN

    ARISTOCRACY (PATRIARCHY) IS A CRITICAL RESPONSIBILTY: WE SET LIMITS. WE DON’T ENGAGE IN ADVOCACY. WE PRODUCE THE FIRST COMMONS: THE REQUIREMENT FOR PRODUCTIVE COOPERATION.

    Our function is to incrementally but consistently evolve our people (and prevent their devolution) by preventing parasitism, and forcing productive cooperation. We force the development of markets for good and services by prohibiting parasitism. We force the production of markets for commons by prohibiting parasitism.

    There is a great difference between RULE (conflict resolution) and GOVERNANCE (production of commons). Our function is to RULE (judiciary, rule of law, property rights, property en-toto.) The entrepreneurial aristocracy’s function is to organize PRODUCTION using the voluntary organization of production. Our gossip class’s function is to ADVOCATE for the allocation of resources to particular ends. But in all cases we must prevent parasitism.

    It is epistemologically impossible for an aristocratic minority to police all of these functions for parasitism without tyranny. It is on the other hand, trivially easy for individuals to police these functions for parasitism without tyranny. The means by which we engage individuals in the process of policing is to grant them universal standing in the prosecution of parasitism, expressed as the right to property-en-toto, and to include them in the restitution under conspiracy if they fail to prosecute parasitism.

    Our function is to create order by prohibiting parasitism- to create the first commons: cooperation (property-en-toto). Not to advocate. Others’ functions are to produce goods and services for the commons, and advocate for and produce commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:53:00 UTC

  • YOU’RE EMPIRICALLY INCAPABLE OF SELF RULE IF YOUR PEOPLE ARE RUNNING TO THE WEST

    YOU’RE EMPIRICALLY INCAPABLE OF SELF RULE IF YOUR PEOPLE ARE RUNNING TO THE WEST.

    Either fix your problem at home, hire us to fix it for you (it’s quite easy if your honest to fix a society). And if you do neither, out of defense, we must start a new program of colonization and modernization out of our own self defense.

    It is not our burden. Its our defense.

    You have no right to externalize your failures.

    We have no right to externalize our failures (democracy and equality)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:00:00 UTC

  • #tcot #nrx #tlot Does your government improve cooperation and exchange, or creat

    #tcot #nrx #tlot Does your government improve cooperation and exchange, or create conflict and takings? That’s an easy question to answer.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 11:11:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623812707070935040

  • #tcot #NRx But why must we persist in a submissive mythos of federation, truth,

    #tcot #NRx But why must we persist in a submissive mythos of federation, truth, trust and love, instead of just truth, trust and love?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 10:12:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623797640082399232

  • #tcot #NRx Rule of law, and production of commons are two different things. Demo

    #tcot #NRx Rule of law, and production of commons are two different things. Democracy is a catastrophe because it merges law and commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:53:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623793047998984192