“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Explained: The Libertine Fallacy Of Crusoe’s Island Thought Model
“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
-
The Fallacy of Libertinism’s Crusoe’s Island Though Model. #NRx #AltRight #Conse
The Fallacy of Libertinism’s Crusoe’s Island Though Model. #NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian https://t.co/iTPyvDlF65

Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 12:33:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674929874574950400
-
The Nobel Prize is an Instrument of Propaganda Supporting Democratic Socialism
[W]ell, the Nobel Prize is awarded for POLITICAL ACTIVISM, not for content. Is her work worthy of a Nobel? Not likely. Is Solzhenitzyn? Maybe. The only Nobel prizes that are not rewarded on the basis of political progressivism are the hard (physical) sciences. The nobel prize is a vehicle for promoting european social democracy. So in this sense, the Nobel prize given to this woman is equivalent to the Russian sponsorship of the Frankfurt School, The Ron Paul Institute, Global Research in Canada, and Russian funding of Muslim terrorists in Europe and America. I have gained enough (limited) understanding of Russian economics and infrastructure to grasp why Putin does what he does. The only problem I have with what he does is (a) expanding Russian influence into eastern Europe, and (b) that they lie about what they’re doing. The reason is that both American experiment has failed, and the Russian experiment has failed. And we both need to contain the barbarians and get our own houses in order, and punish troublemakers rather than try to expand our influence.
-
The Nobel Prize is an Instrument of Propaganda Supporting Democratic Socialism
[W]ell, the Nobel Prize is awarded for POLITICAL ACTIVISM, not for content. Is her work worthy of a Nobel? Not likely. Is Solzhenitzyn? Maybe. The only Nobel prizes that are not rewarded on the basis of political progressivism are the hard (physical) sciences. The nobel prize is a vehicle for promoting european social democracy. So in this sense, the Nobel prize given to this woman is equivalent to the Russian sponsorship of the Frankfurt School, The Ron Paul Institute, Global Research in Canada, and Russian funding of Muslim terrorists in Europe and America. I have gained enough (limited) understanding of Russian economics and infrastructure to grasp why Putin does what he does. The only problem I have with what he does is (a) expanding Russian influence into eastern Europe, and (b) that they lie about what they’re doing. The reason is that both American experiment has failed, and the Russian experiment has failed. And we both need to contain the barbarians and get our own houses in order, and punish troublemakers rather than try to expand our influence.
-
THE NOBEL PRIZE IS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROPAGANDA SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF DEMOC
THE NOBEL PRIZE IS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROPAGANDA SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM
Well, the Nobel Prize is awarded for POLITICAL ACTIVISM, not for content. Is her work worthy of a Nobel? Not likely. Is Solzhenitzyn? Maybe. The only Nobel prizes that are not rewarded on the basis of political progressivism are the hard (physical) sciences. The nobel prize is a vehicle for promoting european social democracy.
So in this sense, the Nobel prize given to this woman is equivalent to the Russian sponsorship of the Frankfurt School, The Ron Paul Institute, Global Research in Canada, and Russian funding of Muslim terrorists in Europe and America.
I have gained enough (limited) understanding of Russian economics and infrastructure to grasp why Putin does what he does. The only problem I have with what he does is (a) expanding Russian influence into eastern Europe, and (b) that they lie about what they’re doing.
The reason is that both American experiment has failed, and the Russian experiment has failed. And we both need to contain the barbarians and get our own houses in order, and punish troublemakers rather than try to expand our influence.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 04:26:00 UTC
-
ONLY THINGS THAT MELT IN THIS POT, ARE RULE OF LAW, HIGH TRUST, THE COMMONS, AND
http://www.amazon.com/Hive-Mind-Your-Nations-Matters/dp/0804785961THE ONLY THINGS THAT MELT IN THIS POT, ARE RULE OF LAW, HIGH TRUST, THE COMMONS, AND THE VOLUNTARISM OF THE CIVIC SOCIETY
—-“For along with strange people, strange doctrines must come in; and novel doctrines bring novel decisions, from which there must arise many feelings and resolutions which destroy the harmony of the existing political order. Therefore he thought it more necessary to keep bad manners and customs from invading and filling the city than it was to keep out infectious diseases.”—Plutarch
ALSO READ
Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nations IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own
http://www.amazon.com/Hive-Mind-Your-Nation%C2%92s-Matters/dp/0804785961
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 03:59:00 UTC
-
Q&A: “CURT, HAVE YOU MELLOWED ON PUTIN?” —“I wanted to ask. Your position on P
Q&A: “CURT, HAVE YOU MELLOWED ON PUTIN?”
—“I wanted to ask. Your position on Putin seems to have mellowed some.”—
Its because I’ve switched from criticizing to pitching a solution “He’s right, and if you’re right, just speak the truth. Truth will unite us all”.
I’m following my own advice that criticism is not a solution but an admission one doesn’t have one.
I have one so I”m going to stay on message.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 01:18:00 UTC
-
The Open Society Experiment Failed
[J]ust like every other cosmopolitan pseudoscience. Just another ideological catastrophe. Sorry Karl Popper. You were just subconsciously hoping to recreate your ancestral home in eastern Europe under the remote and disinterested tsars. The Ancient Slaves. The Medieval Jewish Ghetto. Eastern Europe under the Tzars. Israel defended by American arms and money. And the Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island. Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the european nobles and knights. It represents the eastern european territories defended by the Tsars and the Polish/Lithuanian Armies. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. Crusoe’s island isn’t the source of a general rule from which we learn the origins of liberty. Crusoe’s island is an exception that proves the rule that a people who cannot pay the high cost of land holding inevitably become a parasite on those who do. Popper’s Open Society is just another attempt by a naturally nomadic people so incapable of land holding that it must be genetic defect, and so trained by the megalomaniacal hatred of others, that they promise the duplicity of an open society while forcing others to pay the cost of hosting them. The philosophy of the jews fails every time. If your people cannot pay the high cost of holding land, you are exporting the cost of your housing onto your host civilization. The Gnostics were right. Jehovah was a babylonian devil. And the jews bought his lies hook line and sinker. The open society has been as catastrophic as Marx’s socialism and communism, the Frankfurt School’s postmodernism, Rawlsian Social democracy, rothbardian libertarianism, and Straussian Neo-Conservatism. There is no free ride. There is no safety in universalism. There is only cooperation by the best to prevent conquest by the rest.
-
The Open Society Experiment Failed
[J]ust like every other cosmopolitan pseudoscience. Just another ideological catastrophe. Sorry Karl Popper. You were just subconsciously hoping to recreate your ancestral home in eastern Europe under the remote and disinterested tsars. The Ancient Slaves. The Medieval Jewish Ghetto. Eastern Europe under the Tzars. Israel defended by American arms and money. And the Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island. Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the european nobles and knights. It represents the eastern european territories defended by the Tsars and the Polish/Lithuanian Armies. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. Crusoe’s island isn’t the source of a general rule from which we learn the origins of liberty. Crusoe’s island is an exception that proves the rule that a people who cannot pay the high cost of land holding inevitably become a parasite on those who do. Popper’s Open Society is just another attempt by a naturally nomadic people so incapable of land holding that it must be genetic defect, and so trained by the megalomaniacal hatred of others, that they promise the duplicity of an open society while forcing others to pay the cost of hosting them. The philosophy of the jews fails every time. If your people cannot pay the high cost of holding land, you are exporting the cost of your housing onto your host civilization. The Gnostics were right. Jehovah was a babylonian devil. And the jews bought his lies hook line and sinker. The open society has been as catastrophic as Marx’s socialism and communism, the Frankfurt School’s postmodernism, Rawlsian Social democracy, rothbardian libertarianism, and Straussian Neo-Conservatism. There is no free ride. There is no safety in universalism. There is only cooperation by the best to prevent conquest by the rest.