Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Why Do We Treat Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto any differently than we

    Why Do We Treat Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto any differently than we treat Mein Kampf? I mean, communism did far more damage to the world than the Nazis ever dreamed of. Yet nobody talks about banning those books? I’ve read them all and if you know a little economics there isn’t much to either of them. One is a sentimental journey, the other is pseudoscience.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 10:28:00 UTC

  • PATERNALISM AND CLASSISM BUT NOT RACISM If you adopt paternalism: that your kin

    PATERNALISM AND CLASSISM BUT NOT RACISM

    If you adopt paternalism: that your kin are an extended family, and that you will work with other extended families to cooperate non-parasitically with all other extended families, and that we produce nations not states, then you get this wonderful ability for us to religion, culture, race, class and caste.

    We struggle with a certain problem: that while small nations are better for the development of community and mutual insurance, large states are materially valuable for the conduct of war and less so for trade bargaining. But once we have nuclear weapons it is very hard to violate borders without committing suicide. So there appears to be no reason for large states other than aggressive warfare.

    And yes, some territory is objectively better than other territory. And some genes are objectively better than other genes. And we start from different levels of development.

    But states are as much a barrier to development as they are to improvement precisely because of scale. Scale increases the ability to engage in corruption. With scale we find anonymity. With anonymity we have informational asymmetry. With informational asymmetry we have opportunity for corruption (privatization of commons).

    So you know, I’m a CLASSIST, in that i recognize the problem of carrying a large and counterproductive underclass, but I am not a RACIST in that I want all groups to transcend the animal, become fully human, and evolve into what we imagine as gods.

    And its possible. We had it right. Unfortunately we blew it. And now we have to fix it.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-22 04:17:00 UTC

  • I DON”T WANT TO DISENFRANCHISE ANYONE. A market for consumer goods and a market

    I DON”T WANT TO DISENFRANCHISE ANYONE.

    A market for consumer goods and a market for commons both benefit from producers and consumers.

    But I am an Aspie. I hate conflict. I don’t shun from it. That would be immoral. But I hate it none the less. I grew up in an environment so horrible that no one would envy it. And my dream world consists of one in which we compete but there is no conflict.

    And our current governmental structure, which evolved to suit middle class merchants and agrarians who needed to find a way to allocate scarce resources in order to create necessary commons, is completely inadequate for an era in which the American empire consists of various regions and subcultures put into conflict by constant social engineering – the only purpose of which appears to maintain the bureaucracy and american international military power.

    We can make a better world.

    Truth, Contract, Market Government, Regionalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 09:32:00 UTC

  • If Germany can outlaw Nazi intolerance they can outlaw muslim intolerance. If Am

    If Germany can outlaw Nazi intolerance they can outlaw muslim intolerance.

    If America can suppress christianity in public speech it can suppress islam in public speech.

    If our civilization is predicated upon Aristotelian science, Aristocratic Truth, Voluntary exchange, and Cristian Love and Compassion, we can suppress or outlaw: Mysticism and Psuedoscience, Religious Doctrine, Involuntary Coercion, and Hatred and Intolerance.

    The european war was a century ago. It’s time to defend ourselves.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 07:43:00 UTC

  • DIVERSITY AND CORPORATISM ARE THE SAME THING. A government either improves condi

    DIVERSITY AND CORPORATISM ARE THE SAME THING.

    A government either improves conditions of the family (aristocracy) or it degrades the conditions of the family (corporatism). State corporatism is a war against small numbers of good genes by bad large numbers of bad genes. It’s not complicated.

    Reframe the debate: Government facilitates Corporatism, Dysgenia, And attack on families, versus Aristocracy,Eugenia, and expansion of families.

    Men build aristocracies to promote good genes and their genes, and women build peerages of lower classes to promote their genes.

    NOTHING IS COMPLICATED HERE, OR PHILOSOPHICAL. IT”S JUST NATURAL PROCESSES IN COMPETITION.

    That is why the Socialists undermined darwin.

    They have bad genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 05:29:00 UTC

  • Oh, Alice. We can forgive one another our petty vanities. OTOH, I can’t forgive

    Oh, Alice. We can forgive one another our petty vanities. OTOH, I can’t forgive getting our soldiers killed and lying about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 09:25:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/678506432107560960

    Reply addressees: @AliceTeller

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/678344770461294594


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AliceTeller

    I don’t want to rain on anyone’s parade but the man cheered as the ultimate alpha in America has dyed hair, a comb-over and a manicure.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/678344770461294594

  • #NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian

    #NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian https://t.co/5mo6Cs3TYp


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 09:23:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/678505895920328704

  • #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/678505895920328704/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=678505895920328704#NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian https://t.co/5mo6Cs3TYp


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 04:23:00 UTC

  • News site ranks British Universities by level of freedom of speech

    News site ranks British Universities by level of freedom of speech…


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-19 16:36:00 UTC

  • Creating a Moat Around Russia: Six Points Explaining Why Putin Is Acting Strategically

    [C]REATING A MOAT AROUND RUSSIA: SIX POINTS EXPLAINING WHY PUTIN IS ACTING STRATEGICALLY SIX POINTS 1) The fall of Ukraine was unexpected and Putin feared a spread to Moscow. Rather than call up the USA or Merkel and offer to lease Crimea for 99 years with an option to renew, and offer to exchange the Donbas (The Don Basin) for a large discount on gas for the same period, he ‘flinched’ because of the fear that he would lose his only warm water port. 2) He did expect some difficulties from the west but not the severity of impact on the economy. This was surprising to him – and everyone else for that matter. He is painfully aware that the west could shut off financial transactions with Russia and that would cause the rest of the economy to collapse. While he can threaten to turn off the oil to the west, this hurts him far more than the west – who merely has to buy more expensive oil on the world market – whereas Russia rapidly runs out of money to conduct trade (and internal bribes). 3) Putin wants to restore Russia to peer status in the world. He saw his civilization collapse and it framed him forever. He is not alone. To do this requires that he monopolize the oil revenues so that he can manage the economy through payments (dependents) the way germans manage with duty, brits with morality, and americans with law. Russia does not share our high trust traditions and so he must run the country as a mafia state until he can mature the institutions sufficiently that he does not need to use 50% of revenues to buy influence in order to keep the country running. This is a job that is very difficult that is hard for westerners to understand. Russia is and always has been run as a mafia state – for the same reason souther Italy was run as a mafia state: because no one in or out of the administration was trustworthy. 4) Putin (correctly I believe) wants to provide his people (and the world) with an alternative to the ‘suicidal decadence’ of the democratic secular hedonistic west. Prior to ‘flinching’ in Ukraine, he was the most respected politician in the world. He can quite easily enfranchise the western right and accomplish that goal if he lets go of Ukraine. He may not see that Ukraine is forever gone – the people have turned against Russia forever. (I live here in Ukraine). And that Ukraine will want membership in both the EU and NATO and if not, then the eastern european countries will form an alternative to NATO. 5) He has a muslim problem greater than that of Europe and America, and worse yet, he depends on Chechen muslims to do much of his ‘dirty work’. So he is empowering enemies. His reason for acting in Syria is three fold: (a) he wants to kill off as many muslims as possible so that they don’t expand to Russia. (b) most maps don’t show this well, but most of the oil in the world that is profitable to take out of the ground is in a narrow region between the saudi Peninsula and the Barents sea. Now,it’s one thing if radical muslims hold the southern half of that territory, but not if they terrorize Russia and get hold of the northern half. (c) Russia has not been able *yet* to produce a diverse economy so he needs no to fight a world war with muslims over the oil fields when he is in weakened position. 6) Russia’s most severe problem is that it cannot develop businesses because as soon as they are profitable some member of the upper echelon steps in, drives it to near bankruptcy and then buys it for a song. This has become the most serious issue to the economy other than the permanent problem with rule of law. The problem of ‘modernizing’ Russia is very difficult and he has actually made pretty significant progress during his tenure. PUTIN IS CONSISTENT We must not misinterpret Putin’s actions in Ukraine as a strategy, rather than an act of panic at the possible loss of the manufacturing base of the Russian military (in the Donbas) and the only warm water port possessed by the Russian military (crimea). Otherwise, Putin has a long term plan to create a traditional Russia by restoring the orthodox church, providing an impassable and state sponsored method of resisting islam,(400 new churches in Moscow alone), slowly reforming rule of law, and after the sanctions are lifted (they will be) using money to diversify the economy. (Russia cannot duplicate the Silicon Valley Model because of the low trust society and pervasive corruption, but it has the talent to do so. Russian psychology – skepticism, cunning, and pride – is very useful in the development of engineers.) Putin is making sure that Russia is an island insulated from Islamic brutality and Western depravity. He is building a fortress of defense against threats to his people. A better example is that he is building an Ark that will survive the coming turmoils. If you see it from this perspective, Putin is profoundly consistent, strategic and rational in the pursuit of his objectives. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine