Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

REVOLUTION: KILL THE BODY AND THE HEAD WILL DIE

(You can behead a monarch, but you must poison the body of a state.)

0) ORGANIZATION

One must develop:

A Political Arm, A Marketing Arm, A Violence Arm.

1) POLITICAL ARM

A set of demands, and someone the state can negotiate with.

2) MARKETING ARM

A small number of people to ‘stay on message’, provide status updates, encouragement, tactics, and communications.

The central arguments are not complicated: we have been conquered by hostile forces determined to render us extinct.

That any opposition is objectively immoral because our solution is objectively moral.

That it is a non-difficult transition that will create greater wealth and prosperity.

That we will save western civilization from the second great lie and the second great invasion.

3 – VIOLENCE ARM

1 – To Warn: Issue Demands (us) Ask the Military to support those demands with a coup.

2 – To Start: Start Fires. Destroy gas stations. Short Power. Sever Communication. (individuals)

3 – When they respond : use entrapment. and use fear to keep them in their barracks. (teams),

4 – To Escalate: collapse bridges, break gas lines, water mains, railroad ties, pour nails on roads, shoot truck tires.

5 – When they escalate: Banks, Radio, Television, Adversarian Media Personalities, (Bands)

6 – When they escalate: politicians, entire bureaucracies.

7 – Use success to Recruit through social media.

Kill the body and the head will die.

Fire is the only weapon necessary to start a revolution.

Gone is the era of mass street protest.

The state-organism’s ability to ‘heal’ (repair) is limited.

We need only overwhelm it’s ability to ‘heal’ (repair).

There are four hours of electricity.

Three days of water.

Seven days of food.

Fewer days of gasoline.

Fewer days of cash.

FROM CRITICAL MASS, IT WILL TAKE US 30 TO 60 DAYS AT THE OUTSIDE. THE OUTSIDE WORLD WILL REACT WITH FEAR AND WE WILL OVERLOAD THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT.

WHY IS THE WORLD SEEING 4GW?

***Yet, another factor is that political centers of gravity have changed. These centers of gravity may revolve around nationalism, religion, or family or clan honor.***

The failure of state corporatism, the failure of corporate socialism, and the reemergence of nationalism, religion, family and clan. In other words, we are not alone in wanting this transformation. The entire world is with us. The USA and the Cathedral and their (ahem) assistants in media and finance, are the enemy of all mankind.

4TH GENERATION WARFARE

1st Generation: tactics of line and column; which developed in the age of the smoothbore musket. Lind describes First Generation of warfare as beginning after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 ending the Thirty Years’ War and establishing the state’s need to organize and conduct war.[3] 1GW consisted of tightly ordered soldiers with top-down discipline. These troops would fight in close order and advance slowly. This began to change as the battlefield changed. Old line and column tactics are now considered suicidal as the bow and arrow/sword morphed into the rifle and machine gun.

2nd Generation: tactics of linear fire and movement, with reliance on indirect fire. This type of warfare can be seen in the early stages of WWI where there was still strict adherence to drill and discipline of formation and uniform. However, there remained a dependence on artillery and firepower to break the stalemate and move towards a pitched battle.

3rd Generation: tactics of infiltration to bypass and collapse the enemy’s combat forces rather than seeking to close with and destroy them; and defence in depth. The 3GW military seeks to bypass the enemy, and attack his rear forward, such as the tactics used by German Storm Troopers in WWI against the British and French in order to break the trench warfare stalemate. These aspects of 3GW bleed into 4GW as it is also warfare of speed and initiative. However, it targets both military forces and home populations.

4TH-generation warfare is normally characterized by a violent non-state actor (VNSA) fighting a state. This fighting can be physically done, such as by modern examples Hezbollah or the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). In this realm, the VNSA uses all three levels of fourth generation warfare. These are the physical (actual combat; it is considered the least important), mental (the will to fight, belief in victory, etc.,) and moral (the most important, this includes cultural norms, etc.) levels.

A 4GW opponent has the following characteristics: lack of hierarchical authority, lack of formal structure, patience and flexibility, ability to keep a low profile when needed, and small size. A 4GW adversary might use the tactics of an insurgent, terrorist, or guerrilla in order to wage war against a nation’s infrastructure. Fourth generation warfare takes place on all fronts: economical, political, the media, military, and civilian.

Resistance can also be below the physical level of violence. This is via non-violent means, such as Gandhi’s opposition to the British Empire[citation needed] or Martin Luther King’s marches.[citation needed] Both desired their factions to deescalate the conflict while the state escalates against them, the objective being to target the opponent on the moral and mental levels rather than the physical level.[citation needed] The state is then seen as a bully and loses support.

Unlike in third generation warfare, the VNSA’s forces are decentralized. With fourth generation warfare, there may even be no single organisation and that smaller groups organize into impromptu alliances to target a bigger threat (that being the state armed forces or another faction). As a result, these alliances are weak and if the state’s military leadership is smart enough they can split their enemy and cause them to fight amongst themselves.

Fourth-generation warfare goals:

a) Survival.

b) To convince the enemy’s political decision makers that their goals are either unachievable or too costly for the perceived benefit.

Disaggregated forces, such as guerrillas, terrorists, and rioters, which lack a center of gravity, deny to their enemies a focal point at which to deliver a conflict ending blow.[6] As a result, strategy becomes more problematic while combating a VNSA.

It has been theorized that a state vs. state conflict in fourth-generation warfare would involve the use of computer hackers and international law to obtain the weaker side’s objectives, the logic being that the civilians of the stronger state would lose the will to fight as a result of seeing their state engage in alleged atrocities and having their own bank accounts harmed.

Three principal attributes of the new-age terrorism were held to be their hybrid structure (as opposed to the traditional microscopic command and control pattern[8]), importance given to systemic disruption vis-a-vis target destruction, and sophisticated use of technological advancements (including social media and mobile communications technology).[9] A terrorist network could be designed to be either acephalous (headless like Al-Qaeda after Bin Laden) or polycephalous (hydra-headed like Kashmiri separatists). Social media networks supporting the terrorists are characterized by positive feedback loops, tight coupling and non-linear response propagation (viz. a small perturbation causing a large disproportionate response).