Love you man, and you are one of the best we have, and certainly one of our best advocates. But let’s understand the normies:
(a) They need a great deal of knowledge of multiple fields to understand these things – and while you have it, most don’t
(b) They need a lot more IQ points than is obvious and you while you have them, most don’t.
(c) And, finally, and this is the interesting part: the validity of ideas is partly dependent upon the context in which they are found or delivered. So when people see this work they do not expect what they have found, and do not interpret it through that lens, nor contemplate that anything I (we) say is extremely dense and needs to be contemplated.
I assume when we publish it will add some validity but I also assume the degree of controversy, which will be greater than that of Darwin, will attract endless braindead criticism. So our job isn’t easy. They killed Socrates. They tried to kill Aristotle. They went after Galieo. And the only reason they didn’t hang Darwin was because the academy found an opportunity to seek independence from the church.
If I wanted to make money I would. This is a calling. And those of us that are called, well, we need to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.
Reply addressees: @WalterIII