Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES?

Richard;

–“What jumps out to me in these figures is not only how left leaning large institutions are, but how the same is true for most professions.”– Richard Hanania

WHAT JUMPS OUT?
What jumps out at me is insulation from the market.
Luxury Beliefs and Virtue Signaling are both possible and endemic, and match Veblen’s prediction of the wealth effect. “The reason to become educated is to escape the market (and work).”

DIFFERENCES
– Conservatives are directly participating in the market. The business owners across the variety of self employed of all scales directly interact with the market.
This means they are personally responsible for capital.
-versus-
– The government
– The big industries
– The academy and education
– The professions and white collar office workers
– Most women
All are insulated from the market by scale (or husbands).
This means they are personally not responsible for capital.
Which means the are not responsible for risk.

What separates urban and suburban-rural voters?
Responsibility for, and capacity for resonsibilty for capital.
Cities generate demand for authority in lieu of responsibility and territories generate remand for responsibilty in lieu of authority.

Why? *Asymmetry of Risk* and *Asymmetry of Responsibility*”

If taxes were allocated by symmetry of risk then the ‘red’ group wouldn’t pay any at all. (In fact, it makes no sense that we tax any of the tradesmen in the country at all. They only contribute 3% to total taxation, and they burn their bodies by their late forties. (Yes our organization proposes this particular tax change.)

What are the behavioral differences between males and females? Asymmetry of tolerance for risk, and therefore asymmetry of responsibilty for self, private, and common.

We do not have a Cultural Problem. We have a political problem because we have an incentive problem. We have an incentive problem between urban cities and suburban rural areas. And we have an inescapable problem of women’s voting in favor of irresponsibilities, and men voting infavor of responsibilities.

The only reason anything moves left, whether education, universities, workblace behavior, political organization, or economic performance, is because women everywhere and always vote for advancing irresponsibilty – despite the fact that the reason for the west’s success (for ‘whiteness’) is the maximization of individual responsibilty – including ‘truth before face’ which woen simply cannot bear. If you pull women from the voting pool everything is always RED except for the coastal immigrant cities whose populations have natural anti-responsibilty incentives.

In other words, we largely have a ‘women problem’ that can be solved by giving women a separate lower house of government. And restoring the Senate as a proxy for the governor and the legislature of the states.

Understand Our Govt Step 1
This would preserve empirical Concurrency(in agreement) – we live in a concurrent republic not a democratic one under the Common law’s empirical Commonality (in disagreement) – not sure why I have to teach this every day. The purpose of concurrency to establish legitimacy (settlement) ACROSS regions, classes (and now sexes). So that the rights of minorities are protected against the malincentives of the majority -thereby preventing majority tyranny.

Understand Our Govt Step 2
The USG is a Market for Exchanges Between Classes And Regions – it is for debate on invstments and trades, not rule. The states rule and the people are sovereign. In europe under the napoleonic code instead of the common law, Governments rule, the government is sovereign, and the people are subjects.

Again. No idea why I have to teach what should be crayon level concepts to the american and european peoples every day – but then I do. Because people are evil and seek power over others so that they don’t have to work, produce, and engage in reciprocal trade. And they will like like the dickens to do so.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @RichardHanania