(important for new right and alt-right)PEACE (disperse efforts – exchange and production ) – Liberty (rule of law, natural law, universal standing and application) – Universalism – Marke Competition: Competition (reproduction, production), Commons Production (monopoly or market) – Insurance: Militia, Emergency Services, Hospital (care) – Voluntary organization of most. —VERSUS—WAR (concentrate efforts – force and destruction ) – Illiberty (command) – Nationalism (genetic and cultural warfare) – Fascism ( economic, and legal warfare) – War (physical warfare) – Involuntary organization of most. THERE ARE NO STEADY STATES – We “FLEX” between liberty and fascism because we shift between peace and war. (Recent related posts on the temporary utility of Fascism as an extension of warfare into economic activity) WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154357209457264 FASCISM’S PLACE IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK-PAPER-SCISSORS https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154366459612264
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Aristocratic Egalitarianism’s Adaptation To Peace And War
(important for new right and alt-right)PEACE (disperse efforts – exchange and production ) – Liberty (rule of law, natural law, universal standing and application) – Universalism – Marke Competition: Competition (reproduction, production), Commons Production (monopoly or market) – Insurance: Militia, Emergency Services, Hospital (care) – Voluntary organization of most. —VERSUS—WAR (concentrate efforts – force and destruction ) – Illiberty (command) – Nationalism (genetic and cultural warfare) – Fascism ( economic, and legal warfare) – War (physical warfare) – Involuntary organization of most. THERE ARE NO STEADY STATES – We “FLEX” between liberty and fascism because we shift between peace and war. (Recent related posts on the temporary utility of Fascism as an extension of warfare into economic activity) WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154357209457264 FASCISM’S PLACE IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK-PAPER-SCISSORS https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154366459612264
-
Marxists Salve The Useful Idiots
ISLAMISTS USE THE MARXIST STRATEGY: PLAY TO THE DISCOUNT-SEEKING OF USEFUL IDIOTS —“Moderates exist only to salve the anxieties of the useful idiots. They were given the right to determine customary problems, then they said that they needed a parallel judiciary. When this was achieved, they asked to be governed according to Sharia. When this was achieved the “extremists” appeared. They said that it was not right for Gods law to be checked by secular law. What was required was the entire islamisation of Nigeria. They realised this could not be achieved democratically, so they took up arms. Abacha gave them sharia and his successors got war as payment.”— Haille Mariam-Lemar
-
Marxists Salve The Useful Idiots
ISLAMISTS USE THE MARXIST STRATEGY: PLAY TO THE DISCOUNT-SEEKING OF USEFUL IDIOTS —“Moderates exist only to salve the anxieties of the useful idiots. They were given the right to determine customary problems, then they said that they needed a parallel judiciary. When this was achieved, they asked to be governed according to Sharia. When this was achieved the “extremists” appeared. They said that it was not right for Gods law to be checked by secular law. What was required was the entire islamisation of Nigeria. They realised this could not be achieved democratically, so they took up arms. Abacha gave them sharia and his successors got war as payment.”— Haille Mariam-Lemar
-
Conservatism And The Central Objects Of Law, Policy, And Commons.
Conservatism is not an individualist but a Familial strategy. In other words, the strategy is building good, self-insuring families. So conservatism eugenically suppresses weak and bad family members from the gene pool, allowing those who demonstrate a willingness to transcend their familial (genetic) weaknesses through demonstrations of heroism. So if your family is too weak you provide you with wealth it’s a measure of your genes. And you are a representative of those genes. Through actions and choices, you may transcend your family limits. Through actions and choices one can descend from a family’s achievements. There are four functions that play for and against your statement. First, the lottery effect is real and necessary (you can’t win if you don’t play) but not all people can win the lottery. This creates incentives for many at very low cost. Second capitalism pays us for the number of people who are willing to contribute to the production of goods and services. It’s purely a numbers game. Making cooking-matches and making symphonies is inversely rewarding; lots of people use cooking-matches. Third – it is extremely difficult to hold wealth over more than three generations unless you are in fact genetically superior. And that is what we see. Fourth – those families that demonstrate superiority over many generations are in fact demonstrating that they are a natural aristocracy – by any measure: and there are very few of them. THEREFORE The central object of law is the individual, since the individual acts. The central object of policy is the family. The central object of commons is the competitiveness of the polity. Insurance of various forms is a luxury we can afford or not depending on the success of the central objects of law, policy, and polity. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine, (And my spiritual homes: London UK, Boston, and Seattle USA) 🙂
-
Conservatism And The Central Objects Of Law, Policy, And Commons.
Conservatism is not an individualist but a Familial strategy. In other words, the strategy is building good, self-insuring families. So conservatism eugenically suppresses weak and bad family members from the gene pool, allowing those who demonstrate a willingness to transcend their familial (genetic) weaknesses through demonstrations of heroism. So if your family is too weak you provide you with wealth it’s a measure of your genes. And you are a representative of those genes. Through actions and choices, you may transcend your family limits. Through actions and choices one can descend from a family’s achievements. There are four functions that play for and against your statement. First, the lottery effect is real and necessary (you can’t win if you don’t play) but not all people can win the lottery. This creates incentives for many at very low cost. Second capitalism pays us for the number of people who are willing to contribute to the production of goods and services. It’s purely a numbers game. Making cooking-matches and making symphonies is inversely rewarding; lots of people use cooking-matches. Third – it is extremely difficult to hold wealth over more than three generations unless you are in fact genetically superior. And that is what we see. Fourth – those families that demonstrate superiority over many generations are in fact demonstrating that they are a natural aristocracy – by any measure: and there are very few of them. THEREFORE The central object of law is the individual, since the individual acts. The central object of policy is the family. The central object of commons is the competitiveness of the polity. Insurance of various forms is a luxury we can afford or not depending on the success of the central objects of law, policy, and polity. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine, (And my spiritual homes: London UK, Boston, and Seattle USA) 🙂
-
The Uncomfortable Political Truth We Must Adapt To In This Century
Nationalism, Tribalism, Familialism are all the best POLITICAL criteria for decidability in matters of commons, just as individualism is the best criteria for decidability in matters of the individual. I don’t like “anti-anyone” other than perhaps I am pretty much against religions that are incompatible with natural law, and are justified by means incompatible with physical law. I prefer limiting immigration to the ‘highly’ skilled (I don’t include IT in that category – IT will be analogous to any other trade soon enough). And I am against the importation of calculators, managers, laborers, and underclasses, in all cases. Precisely because they may increase short-term profits at the expense of long-term genetic, institutional, and normative costs. But if we retain Nationalism, Tribalism, and Familialism in Political policy (positive production of commons) and Individualism in Legal policy (negative resolution of differences), then this forces groups to pay their own way genetically, institutionally, and normatively. And by doing so raise their family, tribe, and nation to transcendence. We do not make better people so much as we eliminate those people who are a detriment to the better people. And it is this reality that we must come to terms with in this century. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine</div>
-
The Uncomfortable Political Truth We Must Adapt To In This Century
Nationalism, Tribalism, Familialism are all the best POLITICAL criteria for decidability in matters of commons, just as individualism is the best criteria for decidability in matters of the individual. I don’t like “anti-anyone” other than perhaps I am pretty much against religions that are incompatible with natural law, and are justified by means incompatible with physical law. I prefer limiting immigration to the ‘highly’ skilled (I don’t include IT in that category – IT will be analogous to any other trade soon enough). And I am against the importation of calculators, managers, laborers, and underclasses, in all cases. Precisely because they may increase short-term profits at the expense of long-term genetic, institutional, and normative costs. But if we retain Nationalism, Tribalism, and Familialism in Political policy (positive production of commons) and Individualism in Legal policy (negative resolution of differences), then this forces groups to pay their own way genetically, institutionally, and normatively. And by doing so raise their family, tribe, and nation to transcendence. We do not make better people so much as we eliminate those people who are a detriment to the better people. And it is this reality that we must come to terms with in this century. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine</div>
-
Its Time To Do Something Noble…
(worth repeating) I think many of us were attracted to libertarianism under the assumption that we could do something noble with what we found there. But we were wrong. We can still do something noble, however. But we must do it at the Point of a Knife, The End of a Spear, The Blade of a Sword, The Barrel of a Gun, and under the Gavel of the Natural Law. We gave the world a chance to join the aristocracy. And they failed. The experiment is over. It’s time to rule again. So pick up your knife, spear, sword, rifle and gavel. It’s time for us to make Law.
-
Its Time To Do Something Noble…
(worth repeating) I think many of us were attracted to libertarianism under the assumption that we could do something noble with what we found there. But we were wrong. We can still do something noble, however. But we must do it at the Point of a Knife, The End of a Spear, The Blade of a Sword, The Barrel of a Gun, and under the Gavel of the Natural Law. We gave the world a chance to join the aristocracy. And they failed. The experiment is over. It’s time to rule again. So pick up your knife, spear, sword, rifle and gavel. It’s time for us to make Law.