Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I have been working on post-democratic political institutions since 1992. There

    I have been working on post-democratic political institutions since 1992. There are exceptional alternatives.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 02:38:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804877534110380032

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803523215662415872


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803523215662415872

  • Jon Haidt: Democracy: ‘Warning Signs Are Flashing Red’

    https://t.co/LVJM9f8e0SVia Jon Haidt: Democracy: ‘Warning Signs Are Flashing Red’


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-02 21:40:00 UTC

  • THE “COMPLETE” ESTATES OF THE REALM (THE CROSS) POSITIVE: ……Priests, Intelle

    THE “COMPLETE” ESTATES OF THE REALM (THE CROSS)

    POSITIVE:

    ……Priests, Intellectuals, and Artists (opportunity and consensus)

    NEGATIVE:

    ……Judges, Sheriffs, and Warriors (violence and law)

    PRODUCTIVE

    ……Scientists, Entrepreneurs and Laborers (exchange and contract)

    CONSUMPTIVE:

    ……Mothers, Children, and Aged (birth, education, and care)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 12:52:00 UTC

  • THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOVEREIGNTY – Aristocratic Sovereignty demonstrable in fact.

    THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOVEREIGNTY

    – Aristocratic Sovereignty demonstrable in fact. (create order)

    – Bourgeoise Liberty by permission for profit. (organize)

    – Craftsman Freedom by permission when profitable. (transform)

    – Dependent Subsidy for virtue signals when possible. (reproduce)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 07:52:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARISTOCRATIC SOVEREIGNTY IN FACT, AND BOURGEOISE

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARISTOCRATIC SOVEREIGNTY IN FACT, AND BOURGEOISE LIBERTY BY PERMISSION?

    (good argument against parasitic rothbardians, and libertarians who have not yet ‘come over’.)

    All talk of rights is the equivalent of all talk of god’s demands. Nonsense. Rights are created as the end result – the effect. What are they the result of?

    (a) Sovereignty is testably true or false, and is a condition created by nothing other than the capacity to oppose impositions against one’s possessions by retaliation with violence. Sovereign men = legislatures of one.

    (b) A condition of liberty is obtained by permission of those who are sovereign. And the history of liberty is the history of begging the sovereign for a limited imitation of sovereignty that we call liberty. Liberty is granted by sovereign men to unsovereign men so that they may be taxed for profit.

    (d) among sovereign men, and those dependents who one grants liberty, the only means of preserving sovereignty and liberty is to resolve disputes by natural, judge discovered, common law of no-imposition: non-provocation of retaliation, against property-in-toto: the investments of the other.

    (e) The sovereign minority creates liberty for the dependent minority who holds liberty by permission, in exchange for producing commissions earned by the sovereign that those who possess liberty do not pay.

    (f) There exist moral fees and immoral fees. But if the fees are moral (productive ends) then *all moral taxes are moral* so to speak.

    (g) we are not equal, unless we are equal in sovereignty. We are only equal in sovereignty in a militia of reciprocally insured men.

    (h) and reciprocally insured men have by their action created a commons which we call property rights and the court of common law: a right constitutes an insurance claim upon the promise of reciprocity between and enforced by sovereign men.

    THEREFORE

    1) the scope of ones possessions and interests one claims reciprocal insurance of in order not to retaliate, break the peace and harm the market, and produce retaliation spirals, is limited only by the range of investments sovereign men make in the market that they have constructed by the use of violence to prohibit parasitism and create increases in trade from which they profit.

    2) The entire libertine corpus consists of whining and begging to obtain the benefits of a market created by others, while escaping the costs. in other words libertarianism is an elaborate excuse to free ride upon the commons just as socialism is an elaborate excuse to free ride on private production. just another fraud in obscurant language.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 07:38:00 UTC

  • FOREIGN POLICY: POSTWAR ASSUMPTIONS NOW FALSE 1) FALSE: The United States enjoys

    FOREIGN POLICY: POSTWAR ASSUMPTIONS NOW FALSE

    1) FALSE: The United States enjoys and will continue to enjoy uncontested military primacy, not just globally, but in all key strategic theaters.

    2) FALSE: U.S. allies are the richest, most capable countries in the world.

    3) FALSe: A richer and more globally integrated China will also be a freer and more peaceful China.

    4) FALSE: Great-power war is obsolete.

    5) FALSE: The advance of democracy is unstoppable and irreversible.

    6) FALSE: Globalization is inexorable.

    7) FALSE: Technological innovation will lead to greater human flourishing and freedom, and will disproportionately favour the United States.

    In other words CONSERVATIVES WERE RIGHT.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 06:54:00 UTC

  • I want civil war, the dissolution of the empire, and the restoration of rule of

    I want civil war, the dissolution of the empire, and the restoration of rule of law. (the nazis hate me btw)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 04:18:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804177866137235456

    Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker @grimsithe

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804167002973761538


    IN REPLY TO:

    @jeffreytucker

    @curtdoolittle @grimsithe I really don’t think you want to embrace what’s about to happen Curt.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804167002973761538

  • And the only institutions that are possible under sovereignty are markets – mark

    And the only institutions that are possible under sovereignty are markets – markets in everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 01:44:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804139105189773326

    Reply addressees: @grimsithe @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216

  • Sovereignty exists or not, Liberty is obtained by permission, freedom out of uti

    Sovereignty exists or not, Liberty is obtained by permission, freedom out of utility, subsidy out of signaling.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 01:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804138442875695104

    Reply addressees: @grimsithe @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216

  • NO, THE USA HAD NO STRATEGIC INTEREST IN UKRAINE, BUT THE OLIGARCHS CERTAINLY DI

    NO, THE USA HAD NO STRATEGIC INTEREST IN UKRAINE, BUT THE OLIGARCHS CERTAINLY DID.

    —“Ukraine is corrupt but that is not the fault of Russia. Its Western puppet government is no better than Yanukovich’s. If anything, it is worse.”—-

    Yeah?

    Do you mean that the soviet system was not perpetuated by russian funding of ‘favorable tyrants’? Even after Putin said “We paid for them, we thought we had bought them.” But was totally off guard when the revolution happened? And so Putin panicked?

    Do you mean, that when the oligarchs realized that Yanukovich was going to hand over the country to Russia, after Yanukovich ditched the EU deal, that they paid for the revolution, and put one of their own in power? After Russia has paid Yanukovich to bribe his way to re-election (I was offered 200uah to vote for him and I couldn’t even vote), and paid him to unfund and dismantle the military so that it would be easy for them to seize the country?

    The oligarch’s clock is ticking and membership in the EU will force them out, but unlike Putin who will just kill them or take everything, the europeans will buy them off. The problem is that Russia is stalemating the EU by preserving the conflict.

    So since I’m probably one of the more knowledgeable westerners in Ukraine maybe you should follow incentives rather than RT propaganda.

    The USA did spend money to help pay for the costs of the revolution, but they were reluctant up until the last minute. I know. ‘Cause I was there.

    So go be a russian troll or useful western idiot with someone stupid and ignorant enough to buy your regurgitated propaganda.

    THE OLIGARCHS WERE AFRAID OF YANUKOVICH AND REPLACED HIM.

    I dunno what is so freaking conspiratorial about the damned obviousness of it. teh govenrment owns 80% of the land in ukraine, and they sell it to foreigners for agrarian production. The oligarchs own nearly everything else, and have privatized as much of the commons as is possible. Why this wouldn’t happen regardless of american intervention is something only an idiot can’t understand. Follow the money. Follow the incentives.

    The USA offered to do the one thing that would fix ukrainian corruption, and that was to pay the salaries of the judiciary, and thereby separate and create an independent judiciary that was monitored by westerners.

    That would have fixed ukraine. But the president, the government and the oligarchs resisted it.

    The soviet system remains until the people of ukraine kill enough politicians that they will kill enough olicarchs that they can use european money.

    But here is what will happen: the euro is going to collapse in the next few years. Not long. This will create a profound depression in europe and force an alliance between Russia and Germany.

    Ukraine has only two years of safety yet. And I doubt I am the only person on the planet to figure that out.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 18:21:00 UTC