Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy,
—“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy, should not be invited to the franchise of defense”—Bill Joslin -
“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy,
—“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy, should not be invited to the franchise of defense”—Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 21:08:00 UTC
-
“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy,
—“Men not interested in planting Oaks, the shade of which they will never enjoy, should not be invited to the franchise of defense”—Bill Joslin -
“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or n
—“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or not have children at all should have no say in the welfare of society. Yet these are the very women assigned to political positions. Women who have put in their time towards raising their little villages, mentored by women before them, have infinite wisdom to impart.”—Megan K. Usui Here is my take: defense is an unsubstitutable service for men, and more-that-replacement mother hood is an unsubstitutable service for women. -
“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or n
—“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or not have children at all should have no say in the welfare of society. Yet these are the very women assigned to political positions. Women who have put in their time towards raising their little villages, mentored by women before them, have infinite wisdom to impart.”—Megan K. Usui
Here is my take: defense is an unsubstitutable service for men, and more-that-replacement mother hood is an unsubstitutable service for women.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 20:56:00 UTC
-
“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or n
—“Women whose instinct is to leave their children with a nanny or in daycare or not have children at all should have no say in the welfare of society. Yet these are the very women assigned to political positions. Women who have put in their time towards raising their little villages, mentored by women before them, have infinite wisdom to impart.”—Megan K. Usui Here is my take: defense is an unsubstitutable service for men, and more-that-replacement mother hood is an unsubstitutable service for women. -
Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.
We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality. -
LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FA
LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES.
We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer.
—“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’
Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE.
The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses.
The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth.
As far as I know, that’s the science.
My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy.
If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 12:59:00 UTC
-
Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.
We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.