Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • I have seen this coming since 92. and I’ve been working on it part time until 09

    I have seen this coming since 92. and I’ve been working on it part time until 09, and full time since then. Everyone other than the extreme right and left will favor our solutions.
    But timing determines cost and risk. The overton window must move to the minimum cost and risk position. When it does we’ll have everything ready. We need 2M to show up for 3+ weeks. It’s harder now than in 19/20 because the left has been so successful at shutting down collaboration and the state has been prosecuting everyone absurdly aggressively.
    But the window keeps moving and the number of forces driving toward a ‘change’ is unstoppable. The only question is whether we can prevent a conflict internal or external first, or whether we will have to pick up the pieces after an internal or external conflict.
    Generally speaking no major reorganizations are possible for european countries until after a war. It would be helpful to everyone (and not just our people) if we could prevent that conflict from happening and focus on restoration and the next renaissance.

    Reply addressees: @FuryForth @UScrimeReview


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 18:57:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743346042236551168

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743319346087141530

  • Majorities can’t make such decisions because (a) at most half can, and (b) that’

    Majorities can’t make such decisions because (a) at most half can, and (b) that’s of men. Therefore ‘the men that can’ must make the decisions, take the action, and bear the cost, so that those that can’t don’t cause all of us to suffer for their failings. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 15:34:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743294858788229316

    Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743291251552555196

  • RT @jonatanpallesen: Which immigrants you allow is on of the most important poli

    RT @jonatanpallesen: Which immigrants you allow is on of the most important policy questions. Expected value ranging from positive half a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 12:37:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743250331788583023

  • Humorous. How many ethnicities are there in the Russian empire and how many regi

    Humorous. How many ethnicities are there in the Russian empire and how many regions want to secede and become independent? How many ethnicities are in the Chinese empire and want to secede and become independent?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 08:18:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743185300820484253

    Reply addressees: @IgnatenkoV13270

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743184797286182950

  • SIMPLE LOGIC OF WHY EMPIRES VS FEDERATIONS When you can’t trust each other, you

    SIMPLE LOGIC OF WHY EMPIRES VS FEDERATIONS
    When you can’t trust each other, you consider the state the nation. When you can trust each other, you consider the people the nation. This is the difference between Russia, China, the Middle East versus the West. First, they are empires, not nations. Second, They are low-trust societies. So, their diversity creates low trust, and their low trust generates demand for authority which then justifies itself. And, the enemy has been undermining our trust from inside us for over a century by claiming oppression rather than domestication and the rule of law so that we can trust one another despite our inequality.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 08:01:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743181008315301888

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Saying “No” to compliance (as the farmers are doing here with

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Saying “No” to compliance (as the farmers are doing here with their government) opens the door to cooperation (as the fa…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 07:02:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743166181702250673

  • THere aren’t sufficient peers, and what we discover is that any such polity devo

    THere aren’t sufficient peers, and what we discover is that any such polity devolves into a haven for remote free riders on other economies, pirates, scammers, thieves and terrorists….


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-04 02:00:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742727755630846259

    Reply addressees: @ket74384019 @AutistocratMS @BOB37702515

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742707669272592762

  • “The rights failure to accomplish anything has the appearance to me to be part o

    –“The rights failure to accomplish anything has the appearance to me to be part of a plan.”–

    Lets talk about what the right fails.

    This statement implying inentionality, demonstrates that while feminine minds who don’t understand the rational incentives at play see either irrational instinct or oppression in everything, the opposite is also true in masculine minds who find intentional conspiracy when mere rational incentives or mere instincts are at play.

    So the failure of the right to accomplish anything isn’t a plan. Instead, there are at least the following reasons:

    (a) Christianity is hopeful and tolerant, and christian conservatives had confidence (faith?) that progressives and leftists (mostly women) wouldd ‘learn’ as they gained experience. But this didn’t happen.

    Instead that christian dominance of conservatism became self destructive once the left ended meritocratic participation in government by people with real world experience managing the spectrum of humans – especially by the military and industry – and replaced them with ‘credentialists’ without experience managing real people at any scale, led to ‘the managerial state’ by inexperienced credentialists operating on philosophy and ideology and not evidence and experience.

    (b) elections are decided by women, and the increasing numbrer of young, unmarried, unmarried with children, has led to the attempt to make the state responsible for that which must be the resonsibiilty of famiilies – and vote emotionally and intuitionistically accordingly. Combine that with the fact that colleges and universities are teaching a secular theological religion on the marxist spectrum that (as women do) blames everyone else for conditions, so they undermine and self congradulate.

    (c) Most of all, conservatism it’s a masculine trait. Conservatism is as much a masculine trait as systematizing responsibility and capital seeking and disagreeableness. So the right (masculine) tends to fracture into highly devoted, systematic (religion(social), philosophy(personal), practicality-class (economic), ideology(political)) where they can develop leaders and competency. This is what produces the libertarian to authoritarian spectrum. (packs)

    The left doesn’t require systematic anything other than emotional convergence in the moment seizing every opportunity for icremental gain (herds).

    So the conservatives work by cliff events, under leaders and causes that are hyper activiated to act during that cliff event (warfare) – enough to overcome their cognitive siloing.

    Where the progressive (feminine, left) works as do women, by seeking to exploit all incremental opportunities at all times (undermining) because there is no cognitive siloing to overcome.

    (d) First, y’all don’t donate money to any cause that would advance your interests. Second, when you do give attention or money you do so with outliers (losers) with no chance of victory. Third, becaues of your secarianism you ask for ends that are not a compromise position but an extreme, guarranteeing you’ll fail. Fourth, yall don’t think in terms of delivering solutions – because the right (except for a very small number of us) is anti-intellectual and impulsive. Fifth, and most importatly, you sit at home watching in large numbers as some minority of better men pay the cost and risk of showing up.

    So my ‘paternal’ advice is look in the mirror. Unless you do the following you’re the rieason teh right loses:
    1. donate to what has a chance
    2. learn from and promote those who have a chance
    3. seek compromise positions that all ‘sects’ of the masculine spectrum can tolerate (priority of thefamily) – and don’t try to solve everything at once – choose to move the needlee and keep at it like the left.
    4. Seek actionable solutions that produce incentives to act responsibiliy rather than that others agree with your values and your ideas.
    5. Show up. Y’all never show up. We need 2M men, in DC, for a minimu of three weeks to win. Y’all wiath for other men to do the work for you, pay the cost for you, and take the risk for you. … And that mean’s you’re boys not men.

    Love you all anyway
    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @betterbuiltpool @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 23:19:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742324688729108480

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742310322508116133

  • RT @NoahRevoy: The biggest reason for the right failing to accomplish anything o

    RT @NoahRevoy: The biggest reason for the right failing to accomplish anything of note is that they lack a coherent set of demands for refo…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 21:49:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742302016636907638

  • (The sacred) What is the difference between criticizing some aspects of your cul

    (The sacred)
    What is the difference between criticizing some aspects of your culture’s religion and seeking to use the government to undermine it?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 09:21:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742114000643424383