Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the We

    The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the Western right) are correct on culture and genetics is not the same as correct on government and economy. The only reason russia is a decaying drunken tubercular population collapse instead of as wealthy as norway is the Putin Regime’s attempt to restore the soviet union and russian empire, and this massive corrupt kleptocracy that drains every locale to keep Moscow and St Petersburg from rebellion.

    I’ve tried to buy companies in Russia. It’s impossible. They have three sets of books. And the moment you make any money at all the corruption mafia steps in to milk it, and if you’re somehow successful they simply use art and artifice to take it from you. Russians are still serfs.

    So would you rather blame yourself for not taking to the streets in large numbers to end the cultural-marxist, sex-marxist, and race-marxist abrahamic warfare against our people via the credentialists, when that is possible, or blame yourself for the incapacity to overthrow a government happy to use violence against the people?

    The fact that people are lazy and cowardly on the right, is different from whether the alternatives to our economy and rule of law are even worse.

    We can fix the crisis, even if it requires mass deportation (repatriation), and a purge of academy, media, and state. But putin’s cabal is far worse than the system we have now.

    It is in the nature of the disenfranchised masculine right to want simple and quick answers to hard problems, but that is exactly why the left wins: because they simply keep the pressure on (they’re cognitively feminine and use the female method of warfare by sedition) and incrementally work toward their ends.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:24:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744349470471430144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744280898218959246

  • I don’t disagree. That is still different from my point that the problem is ende

    I don’t disagree. That is still different from my point that the problem is endemic to the manipulation of the system by the enemy not the system itself.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:31:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744169808806006869

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744167126586294295

  • Again. Victim theory. Blame avoidance. There is no reason you can’t, like hungar

    Again. Victim theory. Blame avoidance.

    There is no reason you can’t, like hungary has, or like poland just did, end asylum, and prohibit further immigration, or engage in forcible repatriation, and withdrawal of all support and subidy, and criminalize employment, housing, or protecting those people.

    That isn’t an EU or a NATO or a USA problem it’s a Czech problem. So why aren’t you blaming the man in the mirror, and every other man in the mirror letting it happen?

    We have to clean our own houses (rooms, countries, civilizations).

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:13:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744165304777797632

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744164213113667652

  • A problem easily fixed in three weeks if y’all had the testicular fortutude to s

    A problem easily fixed in three weeks if y’all had the testicular fortutude to show up for three weeks to three months not matter the cost, to stop it. That’s all it takes. And beause the americans haven’t been feminized and disarmed it appears that only the americans can start…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:03:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744162767643312512

    Reply addressees: @Elo_D1 @AEemus @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744151581673603458

  • IS NATO IMPERIAL OR FEDERAL? Remind me again how long the Czech people resisted

    IS NATO IMPERIAL OR FEDERAL?
    Remind me again how long the Czech people resisted the Germans, then the Hungarians, then the Russians, then the soviets? For a time the country ceased to exist. In 1968 it only took the soviets seven days. And how would the people resist them today? Or resist anyone else for that matter? And so, what is the ‘price’ for the privilege of the sovereignty the Czech people have today? And what is the social, economic, political, and strategic value of EU and NATO participation vs those who lack it?

    While you are correct that the Enemy rides on the postwar institutions, that does not mean the the postwar institutions are flawed, or that there is a superior alternative, other than an a compulsory EU military and the higher taxes to pay for it, it only means we have not (yet) ended the capacity of the enemy to undermine our people and our governments (which is our organization’s mission.)

    The global anglosphere, and the continental germanosphere would much prefer not having to carry the burden of ‘poor europe’ but, and France would love to contain Germany as the dominant power over the continent, just as would Russia. So an EU military with USA levels of funding and participation, would radically benefit the USA and the Anglosphere whose only concerns are naval and air, and have nothing to do with land wars. The problem is the total EU military spending at 200 billion is 1/4 of the US spend of 800 billion, despite the EU population being 510 million versus the US only 425 million, and the EU gdp of 19.x Trillion almost equal to the US’s 20.x Trillion. So why is europe riding on american people when the postwar agreement was for the purpose of rebuilding europe into a peer again? Only to have it be the child that stays at home and pays no rent?

    So, fight the right enemy. Federation and the cost of federation is the only possible means of both retaining identity, sovereignty, and self determination within the limits tolerable by other members of the federation – which usually means defection to aide a foreigh power, or engaging in trade with foreign powers at the expense of members of the federation.
    After all that is the value of federation: shared defense, shared trade policy, shared insurance against disaster and crisis, and credit capacity to insure all the above.

    I want our people to live in safety and prosperity, and to end the second abrahamic destruction fo europe and if necessary contain it forever as the indians, russians, and chinese seek to do. That does not include however throwing babies out with the bathwater because of internl failures that can be corrected more easily than the entirety of the system can be replaced if lost.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:01:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744162423618072577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744148044642181613

  • In the converse of the Iranian, Russian, Chinese want of empire in the face of t

    In the converse of the Iranian, Russian, Chinese want of empire in the face of the desire and demand for self determination by other countries, why is it that countries so actively seek to join the EU (europe) and NATO (the west)? In fact, who seeks alliance with the restoration… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1743185300820484253

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 23:38:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744141461317116083

  • That has nothing to do with whether that expansion and integration is better for

    That has nothing to do with whether that expansion and integration is better for the ukrainian people than the alternatives – and given the experience of all other post soviet states that have integrated into europe, and the radical benefits for having done so, our only moral obligation is to integrate every country willing and able that is both european and christian.

    Conversely, RU has not moral or practical need to prevent such betterment of the quality of life of the people of another country, other than to continue to extort revenue from the people for the benefit of the ruling coalition.

    Reply addressees: @Elo_D1 @AEemus @dr_duchesne

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 23:35:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744140657386528769

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744139507803234539

  • Actually, it is the democratic party that serves the billionaires. Look it up. T

    Actually, it is the democratic party that serves the billionaires. Look it up. That’s called a fact. Single mothers and single women are responsible for decay as I stated. That’s also a fact. Look it up. Women are overwhelmingly prone to emotive and magical thinking – which is why their testimony in courts was historically discounted worldwide. That’s a fact. Look it up. Women, even today, often cannot distinguish between true/not and desirable/not, and presume their emotions are facts – as you have demonstrated here.

    Reply addressees: @madebybadcode @evanfeenstra @evilpersists @naval

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 21:33:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744110052292636672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744093721900024028

  • NATO wasn’t aggressing. No need to. Russia is demographically dying. That said,

    NATO wasn’t aggressing. No need to. Russia is demographically dying. That said, aggression is very different from economic and cultural integration to raise the only remaining poor people in Europe into peerage with their neighbors, when hat’s what the population desires most of all. SO, there was no provocation. Instead, just as Taiwanese superiority is a threat to the Chinese Communist party authority, european superiority was a threat to Putin’s cabal’s authority. And putin wants to restore the territory of the soviet union and has ben clear about it. And genociding the ukrainians is simply part of his ambitions.

    Reply addressees: @AEemus @dr_duchesne

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 18:35:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744065348612059137

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744064029683863739

  • Invading a country and threatening to invade other countries. (And I have lived

    Invading a country and threatening to invade other countries. (And I have lived in UA and RU.) And any counterargument you make will be childish repetition of propaganda for morons. No one threatened Russia. No one needed to. The US/NATO strategy was to wait until RU decided to reform and join Europe. It was definitely an american mistake to not seize the opportunity for that in 92. But that is different from threatening a country with an economy the size of texas.) Is RU culturally superior in ethnocentrism? Yes. Sure. Is their skepticism of mass democracy justified? Yes. But is their organized crime syndicate that preys upon the people like the boyars of old, treating them as serfs is unconscionable. And IMO we must save them from their government and them from ours – together.

    Reply addressees: @cailtemac @dr_duchesne @AEemus

    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 18:31:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744064120536592384

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744060687385567422