Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • UNPLEASANT TRUTHS THE DEAD END RIGHT W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not. Nat

    UNPLEASANT TRUTHS

    THE DEAD END RIGHT

    W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not.

    National Socialism is a dead end. Redistribution is not.

    Religion is Dead End. Institutional models are not.

    Takeover is a dead end. Separatism is not.

    Demonstrations are a dead end. Direct action is not.

    Solving your problem is a dead end. Solving everyone’s is not.

    Ideology is a dead end. Economics Incentives Are Not.

    THE SOLUTIONS MOVEMENTS NEED

    All revolutions occur because of a convergence between:

    (a) the state’s inability to modify it’s behavior to serve the diverging interests of the public.

    (b) a common knowledge of an alternative condition (order) that would be preferable,

    (c) a surplus of males that are agitated by this condition,

    (d) an economic or political event that provides opportunity for collective action that can ‘spiral’ (increase in momentum).

    REALITIES OF MOVEMENTS

    The early adopters seek the fringe. The population seeks an Overton Window. As movements age, they upgrade members from the fringe to the Overton Window: Fringe personalities perform research for talented personalities that perform research for mainstream personalities.

    We have better followers this year than last.

    We had better followers last year than the year before.

    We had better followers the year before last, than the year before … and so on.

    I don’t want to associate with the fringe that hinders capture of the Overton Window. They are a dead end. All that matters is the people who will fight, resist, advocate, or not get in the way. And those people will be captured by economic and cultural incentives – not ideology.

    REVOLUTION

    A moral License.

    A set of Demands.

    A plan of Transition.

    A means of raising the cost of the status quo.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 17:54:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF SOCIALISM VS CAPITALIS

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF SOCIALISM VS CAPITALISM
    What kind of government? Rule of Law, or Rule by Discretion? It’s an easy question.

    Natural Law Capitalism (markets in everything, limited by externality) must emerge under rule of law since no other option is available. The only externality is black markets (crime) to profit by imposition of costs by externalities. All other forms of circumventing rule of law by rule of discretion will simply breed special interests, monopolies, rents, and corruption – as well as black markets

    One of the great intellectual scams of the 19th and 20th centuries is to sell the replacement of rule of law, with arbitrary rule – by selling capitalism (unlimited free trade capitalism that tolerates externalities), versus socialism (discretionary rule socialism that manufactures externalities in volume).

    There is no alternative to a mixed economy. The alternative is between rule of law mixed economy (dividends to shareholder-citizens), and arbitrary rule mixed economy (dividends to the political class and their enablers).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:16:15 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT SCALE:
    The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:07:22 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. LIBERTARIANISM VS SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (pastora

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    LIBERTARIANISM VS SOVEREIGNTARIANISM
    (pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territorialism/production)

    The difference between my anglo sovereigntarianism and ashkenazi libertarianism(libertinism) is that the militia and the judiciary rule under the natural law of reciprocity, property in toto, universal standing, and universal application – with a monarchy as a judge of last resort (headman). And that one constructs the market for the construction of commons (government) in whatever way is necessary for competitive persistence(survival, and flourishing) of the polity (militia). This means monarchy, republic, direct democracy, as conditions (war, growth, windfalls) warrant. This organization both adapts to all circumstances and suppresses all parasitism of all forms – providing competitive survivability; whereas ashkenazi libertarianism (libertinism) does not suppress parasitism. It licenses it. And ensures the competitive death or conquest of the polity. There is a reason the ashkenazi civilization is diasporic and dependent: inability to produce high trust territorial commons due to the high costs of opportunities, costs, duty and sacrifice required.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:04:30 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post. WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT THEY INTENDED TO HAPPEN: DEV

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT THEY INTENDED TO HAPPEN: DEVOLUTION

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 11:41:48 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a video. GOVERNMENTS CONCENTRATE POWER. ELIMINATE CONCENTR

    Curt Doolittle shared a video.

    GOVERNMENTS CONCENTRATE POWER. ELIMINATE CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER, AND ELIMINATE COMPETITION FOR POWER

    by Oliver Westcott

    • No democracy, check.
    • Militia, check.
    • Strong borders, check.
    • Ancestors honoured, check.

    Well done lads.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 11:31:31 UTC

  • THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF SOCIALISM VS CAPITALISM What kind of government? Rule of

    THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF SOCIALISM VS CAPITALISM

    What kind of government? Rule of Law, or Rule by Discretion? It’s an easy question.

    Natural Law Capitalism (markets in everything, limited by externality) must emerge under rule of law since no other option is available. The only externality is black markets (crime) to profit by imposition of costs by externalities. All other forms of circumventing rule of law by rule of discretion will simply breed special interests, monopolies, rents, and corruption – as well as black markets

    One of the great intellectual scams of the 19th and 20th centuries is to sell the replacement of rule of law, with arbitrary rule – by selling capitalism (unlimited free trade capitalism that tolerates externalities), versus socialism (discretionary rule socialism that manufactures externalities in volume).

    There is no alternative to a mixed economy. The alternative is between rule of law mixed economy (dividends to shareholder-citizens), and arbitrary rule mixed economy (dividends to the political class and their enablers).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:16:00 UTC

  • THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT SCALE: The Clintons are lower midd

    THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT SCALE:

    The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:07:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANISM VS SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territ

    LIBERTARIANISM VS SOVEREIGNTARIANISM

    (pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territorialism/production)

    The difference between my anglo sovereigntarianism and ashkenazi libertarianism(libertinism) is that the militia and the judiciary rule under the natural law of reciprocity, property in toto, universal standing, and universal application – with a monarchy as a judge of last resort (headman). And that one constructs the market for the construction of commons (government) in whatever way is necessary for competitive persistence(survival, and flourishing) of the polity (militia). This means monarchy, republic, direct democracy, as conditions (war, growth, windfalls) warrant. This organization both adapts to all circumstances and suppresses all parasitism of all forms – providing competitive survivability; whereas ashkenazi libertarianism (libertinism) does not suppress parasitism. It licenses it. And ensures the competitive death or conquest of the polity. There is a reason the ashkenazi civilization is diasporic and dependent: inability to produce high trust territorial commons due to the high costs of opportunities, costs, duty and sacrifice required.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:04:00 UTC

  • WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT THEY INTENDED TO HAPPEN: DEVOLUTION

    WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT THEY INTENDED TO HAPPEN: DEVOLUTION

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 07:41:00 UTC