Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. My understanding of political conflict in the

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    My understanding of political conflict in the present era is an attempt at speciation, and a political structure, and religions counter to it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 20:26:41 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. —“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    —“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Great question.

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short)
    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer)
    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/

    COMMON QUESTIONS
    (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public.

    (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice.

    (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations.

    (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise.

    LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW
    The Natural Law of Reciprocity.
    A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’)

    LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR)
    Monarchy
    Cabinet (Management Team)

    LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH)
    Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons
    … Territorial, and of classes.

    LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS)
    Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 19:50:39 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. REVOLUTIONS AND THE MARKET FOR PACKS OF MEN M

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    REVOLUTIONS AND THE MARKET FOR PACKS OF MEN

    Men form packs. The more diverse we are, the more packs with different narrative. It is not rational to ask them to form herds. The narrative they use is irrelevant. The goals they achieve by those narratives must only coincide. As such, the market for pack cooperation need only agree upon POSSIBLE ends, not upon preferred ends or means.

    Packs (“Units” in military prose) are the optimum order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 19:10:06 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 18:59:02 UTC

  • My understanding of political conflict in the present era is an attempt at speci

    My understanding of political conflict in the present era is an attempt at speciation, and a political structure, and religions counter to it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 16:26:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”– Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (sho

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/—“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Great question.

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/

    COMMON QUESTIONS

    (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public.

    (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice.

    (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations.

    (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise.

    LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity.

    A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’)

    LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR)

    Monarchy

    Cabinet (Management Team)

    LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH)

    Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons

    … Territorial, and of classes.

    LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS)

    Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:50:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”– Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (sho

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/—“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Great question.

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/

    COMMON QUESTIONS

    (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public.

    (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice.

    (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations.

    (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise.

    LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity.

    A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’)

    LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR)

    Monarchy

    Cabinet (Management Team)

    LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH)

    Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons

    … Territorial, and of classes.

    LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS)

    Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:50:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTIONS AND THE MARKET FOR PACKS OF MEN Men form packs. The more diverse we

    REVOLUTIONS AND THE MARKET FOR PACKS OF MEN

    Men form packs. The more diverse we are, the more packs with different narrative. It is not rational to ask them to form herds. The narrative they use is irrelevant. The goals they achieve by those narratives must only coincide. As such, the market for pack cooperation need only agree upon POSSIBLE ends, not upon preferred ends or means.

    Packs (“Units” in military prose) are the optimum order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:10:00 UTC

  • Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:59:00 UTC

  • Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:40:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020680015606960128