Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • THE MIDDLE MUST RULE, AND THIS IS HOW by John Mark To state the obvious, the top

    THE MIDDLE MUST RULE, AND THIS IS HOW

    by John Mark

    To state the obvious, the top and bottom united against the middle, is exactly what we’re seeing now.

    —“Those who possess the goods of life in moderation are best suited to use reason”—

    Or, as I’d put it, middle class people are capable enough to not need to steal (like the bottom) and don’t have enough power to abuse (like the top). Thus the middle is the only group that has the balance of incentives to act morally (in reciprocity).

    Reciprocity produces wealth, which produces a larger middle class *and* a super-rich elite who will be very tempted to abuse their power (act parasitically outside if reciprocity) *as well as* an under/lower class increasingly bitter that they’re at the bottom (ripe for leftist propaganda). The wealth also attracts parasites from without who have no intention/ability to act in reciprocity.

    In other words, a system that operates in enough reciprocity to create prosperity *also* creates its own destruction, *unless* built into the system is a mechanism by which the middle (for the most part the only ones with incentive to continue acting in reciprocity) can enforce punishment against all violations of reciprocity by the top and bottom.

    So the middle must rule. How? Rule of law (natural law of reciprocity) enforced by mostly middle class judges & police, militia and military made up of mostly middle class men (many lower class as well in military particularly, where they are domesticated and gain more agency), run by middle class men. Testimonialism (outlaw public/powerful figures lying).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-03 11:53:00 UTC

  • The Middle Must Rule, and This Is How

    by John Mark To state the obvious, the top and bottom united against the middle, is exactly what we’re seeing now. —“Those who possess the goods of life in moderation are best suited to use reason”— Or, as I’d put it, middle class people are capable enough to not need to steal (like the bottom) and don’t have enough power to abuse (like the top). Thus the middle is the only group that has the balance of incentives to act morally (in reciprocity). Reciprocity produces wealth, which produces a larger middle class *and* a super-rich elite who will be very tempted to abuse their power (act parasitically outside if reciprocity) *as well as* an under/lower class increasingly bitter that they’re at the bottom (ripe for leftist propaganda). The wealth also attracts parasites from without who have no intention/ability to act in reciprocity. In other words, a system that operates in enough reciprocity to create prosperity *also* creates its own destruction, *unless* built into the system is a mechanism by which the middle (for the most part the only ones with incentive to continue acting in reciprocity) can enforce punishment against all violations of reciprocity by the top and bottom. So the middle must rule. How? Rule of law (natural law of reciprocity) enforced by mostly middle class judges & police, militia and military made up of mostly middle class men (many lower class as well in military particularly, where they are domesticated and gain more agency), run by middle class men. Testimonialism (outlaw public/powerful figures lying).

  • The Middle Must Rule, and This Is How

    by John Mark To state the obvious, the top and bottom united against the middle, is exactly what we’re seeing now. —“Those who possess the goods of life in moderation are best suited to use reason”— Or, as I’d put it, middle class people are capable enough to not need to steal (like the bottom) and don’t have enough power to abuse (like the top). Thus the middle is the only group that has the balance of incentives to act morally (in reciprocity). Reciprocity produces wealth, which produces a larger middle class *and* a super-rich elite who will be very tempted to abuse their power (act parasitically outside if reciprocity) *as well as* an under/lower class increasingly bitter that they’re at the bottom (ripe for leftist propaganda). The wealth also attracts parasites from without who have no intention/ability to act in reciprocity. In other words, a system that operates in enough reciprocity to create prosperity *also* creates its own destruction, *unless* built into the system is a mechanism by which the middle (for the most part the only ones with incentive to continue acting in reciprocity) can enforce punishment against all violations of reciprocity by the top and bottom. So the middle must rule. How? Rule of law (natural law of reciprocity) enforced by mostly middle class judges & police, militia and military made up of mostly middle class men (many lower class as well in military particularly, where they are domesticated and gain more agency), run by middle class men. Testimonialism (outlaw public/powerful figures lying).

  • “If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet –

    —“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want:… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289818251615072&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 20:42:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036353711419936775

  • THE IDEAL GOVERNMENT? DEPENDS UPON THE PEOPLE by Daniel Gurpide Voltaire‘s polit

    THE IDEAL GOVERNMENT? DEPENDS UPON THE PEOPLE
    by Daniel Gurpide

    Voltaire‘s political outlook, for instance, was emphatically practical and flexible, embedded in and addressed to the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289787408284823&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 18:30:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036320545577607169

  • YOU GET WHAT YOU TRUST by Justin Allred Monarchy – Tyranny Aristocracy – Oligarc

    YOU GET WHAT YOU TRUST

    by Justin Allred

    Monarchy – Tyranny

    Aristocracy – Oligarchy

    Polity – Democracy

    x-axis: high trust<->low trust

    y-axis: distributed political agency <->concentrated political agency

    The government you end up with is determined by what point on this scale your polity equilibriates.

    —-

    Curt says: And I think distributed vs concentrated reflects (a) homogeneity vs diversity, and (b) Militia vs Professionals, vs Conscripts.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 16:59:00 UTC

  • THE BEST GOVERNORS ARE THE MIDDLE CLASS —“Does Aristotle deem monarchy to be t

    THE BEST GOVERNORS ARE THE MIDDLE CLASS

    —“Does Aristotle deem monarchy to be the best form of government?”—

    by Andy Mansfield, DPhil, former academic, teacher and author.

    Aristotle… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289759168287647&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 16:52:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036295909670350848

  • “If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet –

    —“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want: Netflix, Instagram, Gofundme, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter.”—Michael Andrade

    (Via Steve Pender)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 16:42:00 UTC

  • BREAK UP THE MONOPOLIES —“These companies have to be broken up just like Teddy

    BREAK UP THE MONOPOLIES

    —“These companies have to be broken up just like Teddy Roosevelt broke up the trusts. These [companies] are run by sociopaths,” he said. “These people are complete… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289745271622370&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 15:59:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036282484835663873

  • THE IDEAL GOVERNMENT? DEPENDS UPON THE PEOPLE by Daniel Gurpide Voltaire‘s polit

    THE IDEAL GOVERNMENT? DEPENDS UPON THE PEOPLE

    by Daniel Gurpide

    Voltaire‘s political outlook, for instance, was emphatically practical and flexible, embedded in and addressed to the specific circumstances of various European nations. He supported a mixed constitutional government in England, a more popular republic in Geneva and Holland, a strong monarchy in France, and an even stronger and more centralized one in Frederick‘s Prussia and Catherine‘s Russia. While he generally had kinder things to say about England and Geneva than France, Prussia, or Russia, he did not think that any of these regimes was simply the ‚best‘. On the contrary, he insisted that such judgments cannot properly be made in the abstract, that they can only be based on contextually sensitive empirical analysis.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 14:30:00 UTC