October 20th, 2018 11:25 AM NPC’S AND THE RIGHT [L]ook, the left is a herd (monopoly), the right a collection of packs (market). We can’t script like NPC’s do because we have no herds. We have a thousand packs. Each pack uses its own language. That’s why NPC’s are so hysterical to us: we debate between our packs – we use different arguments values, terms. NPC’s dont. The herd follows scripts. That’s what makes it a herd.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
“Did your views change at all when you had children?”
October 20th, 2018 8:27 AM
—“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn
[N]o. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia). ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )
-
Left Archetype Is Simple Really – Like the Herd
October 20th, 2018 12:29 PM LEFT ARCHETYPE IS SIMPLE REALLY – LIKE THE HERD
—“I wish I could think of an archetype or character in a classic tale of the useful idiot, then I could better describe the left.”–@SPQRIUS
I have worked on this. The Archetype for the left is a combination of (a) The Innocent (child) in the spectrum between (b) The Jester (hedonist) and (c) The Saint (Mother). Just as left specializes in harm/care/proportionality moral bias, they specialize in those Archetypes that explain that bias: Those that Lack of Agency. Innocent (lacks agency)Hedonist (lack agency)Mother (lacks agency over other than her children)
-
The Virtue Spiral of Left Falsehood Into Psychosis
October 20th, 2018 11:55 AM THE VIRTUE SPIRAL OF LEFT FALSEHOOD INTO PSYCHOSIS
—“The Left seems to utter so divorced from reality that they just can react effectively at all. I mean, look at Elizabeth Warren!”—Daniel Roland Anderson
Combining: (a)The Parable of 17 Lies, and (b) bias to double down on malinvestments, (c) Female/herd need to maintain consensus and peace at all costs. For every lie they must tell 17 more to cover it, and 17 for each of those, etc. For every falsification of those lies they must double down with greater lies. This combination of maintaining the collective narrative( Frame/ Dogma), increasing the number of lies, and creating ever-greater lies, eventually leads to a cognitive FRAME that is discontiguous with reality. The left is literally so divorced from reality it is collectively psychotic.
-
More on The Fraud of Tolerance and The Payment of Forbearance
October 20th, 2018 11:49 AM MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE
—“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forbearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]
“FORBEARANCE”
—-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.”— @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]
CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement. (thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)
-
The left is a herd (monopoly)
October 20th, 2018 11:25 AM NPC’S AND THE RIGHT [L]ook, the left is a herd (monopoly), the right a collection of packs (market). We can’t script like NPC’s do because we have no herds. We have a thousand packs. Each pack uses its own language. That’s why NPC’s are so hysterical to us: we debate between our packs – we use different arguments values, terms. NPC’s dont. The herd follows scripts. That’s what makes it a herd.
-
“Did your views change at all when you had children?”
October 20th, 2018 8:27 AM
—“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn
[N]o. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia). ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )
-
SCRIPTING: PACKS ARE SILOED, HERDS ARE CENTRALIZED —“Plenty of right wingers a
SCRIPTING: PACKS ARE SILOED, HERDS ARE CENTRALIZED
—“Plenty of right wingers are NPC as fuck. The point is we can’t centralize the scripting because they are siloed.”—Jennifer Dean
(smart)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 16:41:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053687783435448321
-
SCRIPTING: PACKS ARE SILOED, HERDS ARE CENTRALIZED —“Plenty of right wingers a
SCRIPTING: PACKS ARE SILOED, HERDS ARE CENTRALIZED
—“Plenty of right wingers are NPC as fuck. The point is we can’t centralize the scripting because they are siloed.”—Jennifer Dean
(smart)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 12:41:00 UTC
-
MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE —“The centre hol
MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE
—“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forebearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]
“FORBEARANCE”
—-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.” – @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]
CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement.
(thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 11:49:00 UTC