1) CLOSE the border. 2) Declare a National Emergency and CLear and Present Danger and Militarize and MINE the border, 3) Cut all south american aid. 3) End all wire transfer activity to South America. 4) Nationalize and Close Western Union.
@POTUS #realDonaldTrump #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 18:17:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054436612527046656
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44556252_10156726060032264_1178558731332354048_n_10156726060027264.jpg THE WORK IS FOR THE POLITICAL (RULING) CLASS
(h/t: @[100022914672953:2048:Igor Surkanov], @[100023003929982:2048:Alba Rising] )
Please stop asking me (us) to create a religion. I’ve laid out a prescription for a religion that isn’t false. And a “Cult” of the law that perpetuates our existing “Sacredness” of the law, the judiciary, courtroom, and the jury.
Propertarianism solves the “missing” science: Social Science.
With that solution we provide a Scientific basis for Law.
And within that scientific basis, a logic, grammar, and vocabulary for law, and a test (criteria) for testimony (truth).
This is my job. If I live long enough (Which is not very likely), and can invest a little money in content editors, I will produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization (literature). That culls Semiticism from our history completely. But I leave ‘religion’ – meaning education of intuition – up to those others who are narrators and educators. I am a scientist and at this point a jurist. And meaning(education) and truth (decidability) are different things.Curtus MaximusTom TomorrowOct 22, 2018, 4:03 PMGeorg IosYou should go on the Stephan molyneax showOct 26, 2018, 6:22 AMTHE WORK IS FOR THE POLITICAL (RULING) CLASS
(h/t: Igor Surkanov, Alba Rising )
Please stop asking me (us) to create a religion. I’ve laid out a prescription for a religion that isn’t false. And a “Cult” of the law that perpetuates our existing “Sacredness” of the law, the judiciary, courtroom, and the jury.
Propertarianism solves the “missing” science: Social Science.
With that solution we provide a Scientific basis for Law.
And within that scientific basis, a logic, grammar, and vocabulary for law, and a test (criteria) for testimony (truth).
This is my job. If I live long enough (Which is not very likely), and can invest a little money in content editors, I will produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization (literature). That culls Semiticism from our history completely. But I leave ‘religion’ – meaning education of intuition – up to those others who are narrators and educators. I am a scientist and at this point a jurist. And meaning(education) and truth (decidability) are different things.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 15:14:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44556252_10156726060032264_1178558731332354048_n_10156726060027264.jpg THE WORK IS FOR THE POLITICAL (RULING) CLASS
(h/t: @[100022914672953:2048:Igor Surkanov], @[100023003929982:2048:Alba Rising] )
Please stop asking me (us) to create a religion. I’ve laid out a prescription for a religion that isn’t false. And a “Cult” of the law that perpetuates our existing “Sacredness” of the law, the judiciary, courtroom, and the jury.
Propertarianism solves the “missing” science: Social Science.
With that solution we provide a Scientific basis for Law.
And within that scientific basis, a logic, grammar, and vocabulary for law, and a test (criteria) for testimony (truth).
This is my job. If I live long enough (Which is not very likely), and can invest a little money in content editors, I will produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization (literature). That culls Semiticism from our history completely. But I leave ‘religion’ – meaning education of intuition – up to those others who are narrators and educators. I am a scientist and at this point a jurist. And meaning(education) and truth (decidability) are different things.Curtus Maximus@[605597:2048:Tom Tomorrow]Oct 22, 2018 4:03pmAlba Rising”point being – the task is in our hands (Curt’s audience) to assimilate propertarianism to the degree we make it our own then distribute this as our own properties (which is what the investment in propertarianism is – investment in an intellectual property).
It’s too vast for.most of us to internalize all of it, so we specialize- I focus on natural law and operationalism, others on other facets.
Find your own take then distribute down to the next teir.
This is what men do, we come together in a pack behind a leader, then when we mature we break away as allies and brothers to form our own packs. (Think mitosis)” – @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]Oct 23, 2018 2:00amJohn EdwardI should do this with economics.Oct 23, 2018 2:02amGeorg IosYou should go on the Stephan molyneax showOct 26, 2018 6:22amTHE WORK IS FOR THE POLITICAL (RULING) CLASS
(h/t: Igor Surkanov, Alba Rising )
Please stop asking me (us) to create a religion. I’ve laid out a prescription for a religion that isn’t false. And a “Cult” of the law that perpetuates our existing “Sacredness” of the law, the judiciary, courtroom, and the jury.
Propertarianism solves the “missing” science: Social Science.
With that solution we provide a Scientific basis for Law.
And within that scientific basis, a logic, grammar, and vocabulary for law, and a test (criteria) for testimony (truth).
This is my job. If I live long enough (Which is not very likely), and can invest a little money in content editors, I will produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization (literature). That culls Semiticism from our history completely. But I leave ‘religion’ – meaning education of intuition – up to those others who are narrators and educators. I am a scientist and at this point a jurist. And meaning(education) and truth (decidability) are different things.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 15:14:00 UTC
—“The relative inequality that causes violence is much more likely a deep seated sense of unfairness (manifesting in the world as inequality) but actually the result of policy being unfair [unjust is the issue, not unequal; or unjust application]. Unduly favoring certain people over others within the same geographic space [most likely differences in enforcement due to class].”— Brandon Hayes
IMO Violence = Proximity + Inequality = Signal Deprivation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 11:55:00 UTC
Try to Virtue signal on the entire hierarchy’s behalf, not some segment of it. We are either an army or a mob. We all do our duty then we are all equal in doing our duty on our collective behalf, even though we are unequal in abilities knowledge and skill.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 16:40:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054049686728966144
Try to Virtue signal on the entire hierarchy’s behalf, not some segment of it. We are either an army or a mob. We all do our duty then we are all equal in doing our duty on our collective behalf, even though we are unequal in abilities knowledge and skill.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 12:39:00 UTC
DON”T PLAY THE CLASS GAME WITHIN THE HIERARCHY OF THE ARISTOCRACY: WE ARE EQUAL ONLY IN DUTY.
Try to Virtue signal on the entire hierarchy’s behalf, not some segment of it. We are either an army or a mob. We all do our duty then we are all equal in doing our duty on our collective behalf, even though we are unequal in abilities knowledge and skill.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 11:24:00 UTC
October 20th, 2018 11:49 AM MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE
—“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forbearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]
“FORBEARANCE”
—-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.”— @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]
CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement. (thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)
October 20th, 2018 11:25 AM NPC’S AND THE RIGHT [L]ook, the left is a herd (monopoly), the right a collection of packs (market). We can’t script like NPC’s do because we have no herds. We have a thousand packs. Each pack uses its own language. That’s why NPC’s are so hysterical to us: we debate between our packs – we use different arguments values, terms. NPC’s dont. The herd follows scripts. That’s what makes it a herd.
October 20th, 2018 8:27 AM
—“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn
[N]o. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia). ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )