October 30th, 2018 11:41 AM HARMONY VIA HIERARCHY OR SOVERIEGNTY [S]orry man. I knew when I wrote it I was being lazy and leaving too much up to the reader, but I was tired…. here: 1) yes asian harmony is a commons paid for by NOT speaking truth regardless of the consequences, in order to preserve the harmony created by the hierarchy, under the presumption of the balance between humans and nature, man and woman, parent and children, rulers and people. 2) european (northern) disharmony (truth) is a commons paid for BY speaking and paying the costs to the dominance hierarchy. Soldiers REPORT to officers. OODA Loops (Maneuver) requires initiative within the limits of contract. Warriors volunteer for war as opportunity (booty). Serfs OBEY rulers. Children OBEY parents. And each maintains the contract for harmony by holding formation so to speak (and asians hold formation almost as well as we do). Sefs are recruited for war out of obligation and are paid. 3) So we produce sovereignty and property and commons, and they produce harmony and property and commons. And we develop faster than they do for that reason. Hence why they have adopted our means of rapid adaptation in POLITICS (law, accounting, industry, science) but not in NORMS (heroism, confrontation, demonstration of fitness by truth to power vs their demonstration of fitness by obedience and conformity).
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Aristocracy?
October 30th, 2018 3:12 PM
—“Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce through birth.”—
[N]ot necessarily an either-or proposition. Given: Monarchy, Aristocracy (military /territory), Nobility (church /governance /ability); the reason for inheritance of the MONARCHY evolved to be inheritable as (a) demand for singular rule decreased as participation by the aristocracy (territory) and nobility (ability) in rule increased, (b) demand for limiting competition over secession between the aristocracy and nobility increased. So via positiva meritocracy and via negativa aristocracy just rotate at different rates, and the monarchy slowest of all (if at all). In this context the elite intellectual families are doing a pretty good job of self perpetuation and maybe we should subsidize them a bit more.
-
More Divided Than Ever? Try 1972?
(FB 1540920393 Timestamp) THE WORM TURNS: THE OVERTON WINDOW MOVES CLOSER EVERY SINGLE DAY
Is this worse than 1968?
by Pat Buchanan Are we more divided than we have ever been? Are our politics more poisoned? Are we living in what Charles Dickens called “the worst of times” in America? Is today worse than 1968? Certainly, the hatred and hostility, the bile and bitterness of our discourse, seem greater now than 50 years ago. But are the times really worse? 1968 began with one of the greatest humiliations in the history of the American Navy. The U.S. spy ship Pueblo was hijacked in international waters and its crew interned by North Korea. A week later came the Tet Offensive, where every provincial capital in South Vietnam was attacked. A thousand U.S. troops died in February, 10,000 more through 1968. On March 14, anti-war Sen. Gene McCarthy captured 42 percent of the vote in New Hampshire against President Johnson. With LBJ wounded, Robert Kennedy leaped into the race, accusing the president who had enacted civil rights of “dividing the country” and removing himself from “the enduring and generous impulses that are the soul of this nation.” Lyndon Johnson, said Kennedy, is “calling upon the darker impulses of the American spirit.” Today, RFK is remembered as a “uniter.” With Gov. George Wallace tearing at Johnson from the right and Kennedy and McCarthy attacking from the left – and Nixon having cleared the Republican field with a landslide in New Hampshire – LBJ announced on March 31 he would not run again.Four days later, Martin Luther King, leading a strike of garbage workers, was assassinated in Memphis. One hundred U.S. cities exploded in looting, arson and riots. The National Guard was called up everywhere and federal troops rushed to protect Washington, D.C., long corridors of which were gutted, not to be rebuilt for a generation. Before April’s end, Columbia University had exploded in the worst student uprising of the decade. It was put down only after the NYPD was unleashed on the campus. Nixon called the Columbia takeover by black and white radicals “the first major skirmish in a revolutionary struggle to seize the universities of this country and transform them into sanctuaries for radicals and vehicles for revolutionary political and social goals.” Which many have since become. In June, Kennedy, after defeating McCarthy in the crucial primary of California, was mortally wounded in the kitchen of the hotel where he had declared victory. He was buried in Arlington beside JFK. Nixon, who had swept every primary, was nominated on the first ballot in Miami Beach, and the Democratic Convention was set for late August. Between the conventions, Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev sent his Warsaw Pact armies and hundreds of tanks into Czechoslovakia to crush the peaceful uprising known as “Prague Spring.” With this bloodiest of military crackdowns since the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, Moscow sent a message to the West: There will be no going back in Europe. Once a Communist state, always a Communist state! At the Democratic convention in Chicago, the thousands of radicals who had come to raise hell congregated nightly in Grant Park, across from the Hilton where the candidates and this writer were staying. Baited day and night, the Chicago cops defending the hotel, by late in the week, had had enough. Early one evening, platoons of fresh police arrived and charged into the park clubbing and arresting scores of radicals as the TV cameras rolled. It would be called a “police riot.” When Sen. Abe Ribicoff took the podium that night, he directed his glare at Mayor Richard J. Daley, accusing him of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.” Daley’s reply from the floor was unprintable.
Through September, Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey could not speak at a rally without being cursed and shouted down. Describing the radicals disrupting his every event, Humphrey said, these people “aren’t just hecklers,” but “highly disciplined, well-organized agitators. … Some are anarchists and some of these groups are dedicated to destroying the Democratic Party and destroying the country.” After his slim victory, Nixon declared that his government would take as its theme the words on a girl’s placard that he had seen in the Ohio town of Deshler: “Bring us together.” Nixon tried in his first months, but it was not to be. According to Bryan Burrough, author of “Days of Rage, America’s Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence,” “During an 18-month period in 1971 and 1972, the FBI reported more than 2,500 bombings on U.S. soil, nearly 5 a day.” No, 2018 is not 1968, at least not yet Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/is-this-worse-than-1968/#tvuOzu3OV1eazsLt.99
-
The Same Then and Now.
October 30th, 2018 6:17 PM PROTESTANTISM AGAINST CENTRAL GOVT OF THE CHURCH, TODAY AGAINST CENTRAL GOVT OF THE STATE. THE SAME THEN AND NOW. [P]rotestantism wasn’t a reaction to the bible, it was a reaction to the corruption of the church, the taxation by the church, and the church as a vehicle for foreign rule, just like washington DC and Brussels today. The church conflated rule, government, and education into a monopoly and used it to entrench costly corrupt bureaucrats, extractive rents, and impose ignorance, in a time of literacy, economic growth, and the expansion of trade in the north, and decline of trade in the south, due to venetian decline as the navy of the byzantines. The church was a very corrupt parasitic government and the people rebelled against it and restored local government. This broke the church’s taxation. Broke the church’s corruption. Let loose the dead capital held by the corrupt church (50% of the capital in europe), and broke the church monopoly on literacy, thereby combining literacy, available capital, expanding trade routes, into a great leap forward in european life and standards of living. Christianity consist of four(or five) rules. That’s it. Four rules you can teach a child. Protestantism ended church tyranny, corruption, impoverishment, and enforced ignorance. Faith was the MORAL language that they described it in, just as we describe today’s economic language in today’s moral prose. Washington is an unnecessary corrupt parasitic power. Brussels is the same. The church was the same. And people have chosen to localize rule, governance, and choice. Why? Because they can. Ask why the orthodox church HASN’T failed instead. Ask why the protestant evangelical churches (church of jesus not god) continues to grow. Ask why the catholic church and the protestant churches of GOD fail. There is no god. There never was a god. There was just a lot of ignorant undomesticated humans who could be exploited by those who possessed literacy. With literacy, the restoration of aristotelian reason, an the empirical demands of trade, all ‘god’ religions are dying EXCEPT Islam and Orthodoxy.
-
Combatting the Parasite Industrial Complex.
October 30th, 2018 3:14 PM COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Industrial Complex branches: – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics) – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics) Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex. Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex. (excellent)
-
Aristocracy?
October 30th, 2018 3:12 PM
—“Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce through birth.”—
[N]ot necessarily an either-or proposition. Given: Monarchy, Aristocracy (military /territory), Nobility (church /governance /ability); the reason for inheritance of the MONARCHY evolved to be inheritable as (a) demand for singular rule decreased as participation by the aristocracy (territory) and nobility (ability) in rule increased, (b) demand for limiting competition over secession between the aristocracy and nobility increased. So via positiva meritocracy and via negativa aristocracy just rotate at different rates, and the monarchy slowest of all (if at all). In this context the elite intellectual families are doing a pretty good job of self perpetuation and maybe we should subsidize them a bit more.
-
More Divided Than Ever? Try 1972?
(FB 1540920393 Timestamp) THE WORM TURNS: THE OVERTON WINDOW MOVES CLOSER EVERY SINGLE DAY
Is this worse than 1968?
by Pat Buchanan Are we more divided than we have ever been? Are our politics more poisoned? Are we living in what Charles Dickens called “the worst of times” in America? Is today worse than 1968? Certainly, the hatred and hostility, the bile and bitterness of our discourse, seem greater now than 50 years ago. But are the times really worse? 1968 began with one of the greatest humiliations in the history of the American Navy. The U.S. spy ship Pueblo was hijacked in international waters and its crew interned by North Korea. A week later came the Tet Offensive, where every provincial capital in South Vietnam was attacked. A thousand U.S. troops died in February, 10,000 more through 1968. On March 14, anti-war Sen. Gene McCarthy captured 42 percent of the vote in New Hampshire against President Johnson. With LBJ wounded, Robert Kennedy leaped into the race, accusing the president who had enacted civil rights of “dividing the country” and removing himself from “the enduring and generous impulses that are the soul of this nation.” Lyndon Johnson, said Kennedy, is “calling upon the darker impulses of the American spirit.” Today, RFK is remembered as a “uniter.” With Gov. George Wallace tearing at Johnson from the right and Kennedy and McCarthy attacking from the left – and Nixon having cleared the Republican field with a landslide in New Hampshire – LBJ announced on March 31 he would not run again.Four days later, Martin Luther King, leading a strike of garbage workers, was assassinated in Memphis. One hundred U.S. cities exploded in looting, arson and riots. The National Guard was called up everywhere and federal troops rushed to protect Washington, D.C., long corridors of which were gutted, not to be rebuilt for a generation. Before April’s end, Columbia University had exploded in the worst student uprising of the decade. It was put down only after the NYPD was unleashed on the campus. Nixon called the Columbia takeover by black and white radicals “the first major skirmish in a revolutionary struggle to seize the universities of this country and transform them into sanctuaries for radicals and vehicles for revolutionary political and social goals.” Which many have since become. In June, Kennedy, after defeating McCarthy in the crucial primary of California, was mortally wounded in the kitchen of the hotel where he had declared victory. He was buried in Arlington beside JFK. Nixon, who had swept every primary, was nominated on the first ballot in Miami Beach, and the Democratic Convention was set for late August. Between the conventions, Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev sent his Warsaw Pact armies and hundreds of tanks into Czechoslovakia to crush the peaceful uprising known as “Prague Spring.” With this bloodiest of military crackdowns since the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, Moscow sent a message to the West: There will be no going back in Europe. Once a Communist state, always a Communist state! At the Democratic convention in Chicago, the thousands of radicals who had come to raise hell congregated nightly in Grant Park, across from the Hilton where the candidates and this writer were staying. Baited day and night, the Chicago cops defending the hotel, by late in the week, had had enough. Early one evening, platoons of fresh police arrived and charged into the park clubbing and arresting scores of radicals as the TV cameras rolled. It would be called a “police riot.” When Sen. Abe Ribicoff took the podium that night, he directed his glare at Mayor Richard J. Daley, accusing him of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.” Daley’s reply from the floor was unprintable.
Through September, Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey could not speak at a rally without being cursed and shouted down. Describing the radicals disrupting his every event, Humphrey said, these people “aren’t just hecklers,” but “highly disciplined, well-organized agitators. … Some are anarchists and some of these groups are dedicated to destroying the Democratic Party and destroying the country.” After his slim victory, Nixon declared that his government would take as its theme the words on a girl’s placard that he had seen in the Ohio town of Deshler: “Bring us together.” Nixon tried in his first months, but it was not to be. According to Bryan Burrough, author of “Days of Rage, America’s Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence,” “During an 18-month period in 1971 and 1972, the FBI reported more than 2,500 bombings on U.S. soil, nearly 5 a day.” No, 2018 is not 1968, at least not yet Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/is-this-worse-than-1968/#tvuOzu3OV1eazsLt.99
-
The Same Then and Now.
October 30th, 2018 6:17 PM PROTESTANTISM AGAINST CENTRAL GOVT OF THE CHURCH, TODAY AGAINST CENTRAL GOVT OF THE STATE. THE SAME THEN AND NOW. [P]rotestantism wasn’t a reaction to the bible, it was a reaction to the corruption of the church, the taxation by the church, and the church as a vehicle for foreign rule, just like washington DC and Brussels today. The church conflated rule, government, and education into a monopoly and used it to entrench costly corrupt bureaucrats, extractive rents, and impose ignorance, in a time of literacy, economic growth, and the expansion of trade in the north, and decline of trade in the south, due to venetian decline as the navy of the byzantines. The church was a very corrupt parasitic government and the people rebelled against it and restored local government. This broke the church’s taxation. Broke the church’s corruption. Let loose the dead capital held by the corrupt church (50% of the capital in europe), and broke the church monopoly on literacy, thereby combining literacy, available capital, expanding trade routes, into a great leap forward in european life and standards of living. Christianity consist of four(or five) rules. That’s it. Four rules you can teach a child. Protestantism ended church tyranny, corruption, impoverishment, and enforced ignorance. Faith was the MORAL language that they described it in, just as we describe today’s economic language in today’s moral prose. Washington is an unnecessary corrupt parasitic power. Brussels is the same. The church was the same. And people have chosen to localize rule, governance, and choice. Why? Because they can. Ask why the orthodox church HASN’T failed instead. Ask why the protestant evangelical churches (church of jesus not god) continues to grow. Ask why the catholic church and the protestant churches of GOD fail. There is no god. There never was a god. There was just a lot of ignorant undomesticated humans who could be exploited by those who possessed literacy. With literacy, the restoration of aristotelian reason, an the empirical demands of trade, all ‘god’ religions are dying EXCEPT Islam and Orthodoxy.
-
Combatting the Parasite Industrial Complex.
October 30th, 2018 3:14 PM COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Industrial Complex branches: – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics) – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics) Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex. Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex. (excellent)
-
“Make Aristocracy Great Again: Propertarianism: “— Adam Walker
—“Make Aristocracy Great Again: Propertarianism: “— Adam Walker
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 17:39:00 UTC