October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM [T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic. While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency. So when I started out and said: 1) we are going to have a revolution 2) nothing can stop it. 3) all we can do is control it. 4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan 5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST. 6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards. 7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution. 8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist. I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future. Cheers
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Under nationalism we love one another
October 31st, 2018 9:47 AM [U]nder nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal. Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.
-
OK. WE ARE HERE. NPR IS TALKING ABOUT REVOLUTION OK. This is worth a video, but
OK. WE ARE HERE. NPR IS TALKING ABOUT REVOLUTION
OK. This is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic.
While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency.
SO when I started out and said:
1) we are going to have a revolution
2) nothing can stop it.
3) all we can do is control it.
4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan
5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incenties that the majority of the population will not RESIST.
6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards.
7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution.
8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist.
I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 17:56:00 UTC
-
Note that your standard terms of service mean that you are part of the problem a
Note that your standard terms of service mean that you are part of the problem as a hosting provider not part of the solution. But commercial self interest is the origin of the ENTIRETY of the problem: Leftism = Hyperconsumption and therefore is commercially preferable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 13:15:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057622134795784199
Reply addressees: @TryGhost @realchrisolin @getongab
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057545081148727296
IN REPLY TO:
@Ghost
@realchrisolin @getongab Ghost is fully open source and can be hosted anywhere – itβs not possible for us to censor or prevent anyone from using the product βπΌ
The (optional) use of Ghost(Pro) managed infrastructure is subject to our standard terms of service, here ππΌ https://t.co/H4glBxPvkOOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057545081148727296
-
Not true tho, is it? I mean, we can and do collect posts on every platform, webs
Not true tho, is it? I mean, we can and do collect posts on every platform, website, magazine, newspaper of consisting of left demand for the elimination of whites. Howe much better the world will be when everyone is brown.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 13:10:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057620899158020097
Reply addressees: @AJHonore @getongab
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057617690020470784
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057617690020470784
-
This is the BEST thing to happen to Gab. Gab is now the de-facto free speech pla
This is the BEST thing to happen to Gab. Gab is now the de-facto free speech platform. Only thing left is to promote it to the left so that it fills the ROLE of USA’s political platform “Out of life’s school of war, that which does not kill us, only serves to make us stronger.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 12:52:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057616189919256576
Reply addressees: @getongab
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057512234639912962
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057512234639912962
-
Under nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of k
Under nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal.
Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 09:47:00 UTC
-
The media is the Enemy of the People, the “Fifth Column”, from the bottom 1/5 of
The media is the Enemy of the People, the “Fifth Column”, from the bottom 1/5 of their graduating classes. If the were liable for the truthfulness of their speech as are members of every other industry (except the academy and state) they would evaporate. Media=Gossip.
@getongab
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 00:51:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057434792269172737
-
All the right needs is the court and the senate. With the court, Trump can issue
All the right needs is the court and the senate. With the court, Trump can issue executive orders, which will be taken to the court, and decided or one way or the other, without the house. Since most of these questions are constitutional, the court can decide them. Thus using the court by the left to UNDERMINE the constitution, and now using the court to RESTORE the constitution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 19:34:00 UTC
-
Harmony via Hierarchy or Sovereignty
October 30th, 2018 11:41 AM HARMONY VIA HIERARCHY OR SOVERIEGNTY [S]orry man. I knew when I wrote it I was being lazy and leaving too much up to the reader, but I was tired…. here: 1) yes asian harmony is a commons paid for by NOT speaking truth regardless of the consequences, in order to preserve the harmony created by the hierarchy, under the presumption of the balance between humans and nature, man and woman, parent and children, rulers and people. 2) european (northern) disharmony (truth) is a commons paid for BY speaking and paying the costs to the dominance hierarchy. Soldiers REPORT to officers. OODA Loops (Maneuver) requires initiative within the limits of contract. Warriors volunteer for war as opportunity (booty). Serfs OBEY rulers. Children OBEY parents. And each maintains the contract for harmony by holding formation so to speak (and asians hold formation almost as well as we do). Sefs are recruited for war out of obligation and are paid. 3) So we produce sovereignty and property and commons, and they produce harmony and property and commons. And we develop faster than they do for that reason. Hence why they have adopted our means of rapid adaptation in POLITICS (law, accounting, industry, science) but not in NORMS (heroism, confrontation, demonstration of fitness by truth to power vs their demonstration of fitness by obedience and conformity).