Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “Do what is instrumental. The end has always justified the means. Virtue deliver

    —“Do what is instrumental. The end has always justified the means. Virtue delivers nothing if it is not accompanied by an iron will. Systems are applicable for a particular time, place, and people. Be Machiavelli in a world of Mother Teresas. Only fools abide by the rules of defeatists.”— @[724441849:2048:Charlie Delta]


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 10:19:00 UTC

  • When I negotiate in a hostile environment I take the position of holding the mor

    When I negotiate in a hostile environment I take the position of holding the moral high ground and ‘stay on message’ creating evidence of a narrative of holding the moral high ground. Most of the time we are punished or sued for honest errors, and get away with our most dishonest and immoral plans. The secret of legal success is holding the moral high ground and betting that the jury will side with you for doing so. I usually go all in and risk the jury. When my peers (board) disagree with me, they lose. Always. I never do a deal where I think I might get sued where I can’t construct a narrative of holding the moral high ground. And the secret is … largely, because you always try to actually do so. its simply the optimum business strategy. There will always be people who think your errors are plans, and don’t see the immoral plans you either did or didn’t take. But build a reputation for never surrendering, favoring litigation, and holding the high ground and it works.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 08:29:00 UTC

  • The lower your demographic distribution the higher demand for authority to subst

    The lower your demographic distribution the higher demand for authority to substitute for trust and rule of law. The higher your trust the lower the demand for authority as a substitute for trust and rule of law. The only means of producing trust and rule of law is sufficiently large middle class that generates demand for rule of law in order to construct the voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, we call capitalism – or what the ordinary person calls ‘an economy’.

    So the dispute between capitalism and socialism was always a (((Lie))), it has always been between consistent rule of law independent of man, and arbitrary rule by man.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 06:59:00 UTC

  • SORRY FASCISM WON: AUTHORITARIAN STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM = FASCISM

    SORRY FASCISM WON: AUTHORITARIAN STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM = FASCISM

    Fascism didn’t fail. Fascism won. The entire world has chosen fascism: National Socialism with it’s extreme intolerance for competition. EVERY polity in the world is moving to ending political competition as dead weight, and is forcing all competition into the marketplace where it is constructive. Those groups that choose fascism (national socialism, or what we call, in order to preserve the gated institutional narrative ‘state capitalism’), are dominating (china, japan, korea) are reducing costs by enforcing fascism (state capitalism, national socialism). I mean, the american left is fascist which is ironic as hell. The american right is not, it’s reciprocal. which is ironic as hell. That said, the chinese tried communism and then moved to fascism, and the movement toward democracy ended in 92 right after the wall fell.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 06:56:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Moral intuition is for the peasantry. The rest of us, whether king, general, minister,financier, or entrepreneur, must calculate.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Moral intuition is for the peasantry. The rest of us, whether king, general, minister,financier, or entrepreneur, must calculate.

  • The question is not how many are sufficient for victory. But how few shall be su

    —The question is not how many are sufficient for victory. But how few shall be sufficient to tell the tale.—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 23:56:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061044923489759232

  • The Coming Civil War: Parasite & Predate vs Produce & Perform. by James Santagat

    The Coming Civil War: Parasite & Predate vs Produce & Perform.

    by James Santagata

    The first Civil War featured two core European populations fighting each other, and although there were genetic differences which manifested themselves in cultural and cognitive terms (IQ), the range of and delta between the genetic stocks were almost non-existent compared to the genetic differences today along with the hyper-growth of an underclass within the European gene pools.

    Yet even with such narrow differences, compared to today, war crimes occurred with frequency, including Sherman’s March to the Sea which was a wholesale campaign of rape, fire, murder and destruction to the sea — with similar tribes vs similar tribes.

    Now consider today’s tossed-salad populations, The range of genetic stock and it’s physical manifestations in terms of reproduction strategies (K vs R-selected) and cultural and cognitive capabilities is unfathomable.

    As such, the strategies pursued by each core tribe and their ability to produce and perform, set against their propensity to engage or suppress parasitism and predation varies greatly.

    Today, the R- vs K-selected gene pools yield such huge IQ deltas cultural and cognitively that the differences are irreconcilable. Bloody clashes will be the result.

    It the Parasite & Predate strategy vs the Produce & Perform strategy all driven by and informed by genetics.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 18:30:00 UTC

  • The Coming Civil War: Parasite & Predate vs Produce & Perform. by @[525087895:20

    The Coming Civil War: Parasite & Predate vs Produce & Perform.

    by @[525087895:2048:James Santagata]

    The first Civil War featured two core European populations fighting each other, and although there were genetic differences which manifested themselves in cultural and cognitive terms (IQ), the range of and delta between the genetic stocks were almost non-existent compared to the genetic differences today along with the hyper-growth of an underclass within the European gene pools.

    Yet even with such narrow differences, compared to today, war crimes occurred with frequency, including Sherman’s March to the Sea which was a wholesale campaign of rape, fire, murder and destruction to the sea — with similar tribes vs similar tribes.

    Now consider today’s tossed-salad populations, The range of genetic stock and it’s physical manifestations in terms of reproduction strategies (K vs R-selected) and cultural and cognitive capabilities is unfathomable.

    As such, the strategies pursued by each core tribe and their ability to produce and perform, set against their propensity to engage or suppress parasitism and predation varies greatly.

    Today, the R- vs K-selected gene pools yield such huge IQ deltas cultural and cognitively that the differences are irreconcilable. Bloody clashes will be the result.

    It the Parasite & Predate strategy vs the Produce & Perform strategy all driven by and informed by genetics.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 18:30:00 UTC

  • I am not trying to be scary but to speak in actionable terms. it is a mistake to

    I am not trying to be scary but to speak in actionable terms. it is a mistake to think that this coming revolution will be fought as the civil rights movements and the french-revolution through the 20th century movements have been fought.

    Those were fights of classes using gunpowder against people. The current era is all against all, eroding the economy and infrastructure, and letting the ‘population load’ of modernity crash into chaos.

    I mean, look at history, but, the reason the chinese ended up with 100x the fatalities in war was population load.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 15:08:00 UTC