—“The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or reasonable. In short they completely lack agency, and therefore must be domesticated by any means necessary.”—-Chris M. Silbaugh
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 15:28:00 UTC
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
TALKING TO THEM IS NOT THE SOLUTION. By John Mark The thing is, *it doesn’t matt
TALKING TO THEM IS NOT THE SOLUTION.
By John Mark
The thing is, *it doesn’t matter* how good we get at pincer attacks on leftist “arguments”. It doesn’t matter if we are all JP-level debaters times 1000. *The left will never change just because we win a debate.* Midterm results show that although JP may help free some people from leftism, in the grand scheme it’s but a blip. There’s close to *zero* effect statistically from all our debating the left. *They don’t care* what we say. They want what they want, they carry out their instinctive strategy, period. They’ve been doing it for thousands of years. The few sincere truth-seekers who change their minds and join our side are not enough to turn the tide. They’re a lone ship drowning in a massive sea of instinctive leftists who will never change. Add in mass 3rd world immigration, and all our “gotcha” moments in conversations with leftists mean even less than they already do.
TALKING TO THEM IS NOT THE SOLUTION.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 14:38:00 UTC
-
“We (broadly, the hard Right) are the only group on the Right that has the answe
—“We (broadly, the hard Right) are the only group on the Right that has the answer, we are the only ones who know how to win, who are realistic enough to know what it takes to conserve anything and save Western Civ. And JP countersignals us hard. Unforgivable.”—John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 13:37:00 UTC
-
“Will you allow the greatest civilization ever built to be destroyed because you
—“Will you allow the greatest civilization ever built to be destroyed because you fear being called a racist? Or because you accepted the false God of equality? Or because liberalism and capitalism brainwashed you into mass consumerism and materialism? Or because of the obsession over ever expanding “rights”? Why do you accept the insanity that people lower than you should be “equal in the eyes of the law”? You know they’re not equal to you for a reason, right? Or will you stand for truth, duty, reciprocity, and rule of law at any cost?”— @Chris M. Silbaugh
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 13:22:00 UTC
-
WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME? by Eli Harman If “negligent homicide” is a
WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME?
by Eli Harman
If “negligent homicide” is a thing? Why not “negligent genocide?”
It’s possible that some misguided fools genuinely believe that a world teeming with “crossbreeds” with no identity and no culture is a good and beautiful thing. I never thought of it that way.
I always appreciate the historical accomplishments of Western, meaning white, civilization and mourned their possibly inevitable future loss. I say “possibly inevitable” because when I gave my loyalty to individualist principles, similar to Jordan Peterson’s, I didn’t see any way to prevent it. Nothing to do but make that leap and hope for the best.
But we have all the evidence we need now to banish hope. Not one great, city, nation, or civilization has been improved by the inclusion of dependent, third world, hordes. And everywhere the process has gotten suitably advanced is a total disaster.
London used to be capital of a great empire. Now it’s the capital of acid attacks. Detroit used to be an unmatched industrial center. Now it’s rotting back into the weeds.
Multiculturalism doesn’t lead to “Star Trek.” It leads to Brazil or South Africa. But it turns out that preventing that is a simple matter of abandoning unworkable and undesirable individualist principles. If any fools still don’t understand, it’s because they are willfully ignorant. That is not a valid excuse any longer. All the evidence one needs is readily available.
But some of our would-be genociders are not ignorant, misguided, nor foolish.
They are deadly serious.
For them, “Star Trek” was never the point.
Only the destruction of Western Civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 12:55:00 UTC
-
THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON- Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[pros
-THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON-
Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial])
… Middle Right (Commercial, Reciprocal, Legal[contractual])
… … Soft Right (Priestly, Moral, Religious[adherent])
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 11:56:00 UTC
-
CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL O
CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER
@Lord_Keynes2
Monarchs have a very bad record. They engage in war and conquest, acquire multi-ethnic empires, become cosmopolitans, and then it all falls apart: e.g., Ottoman empire, Russian empire, Austro-Hungarian empire, etc.
Replying to @Lord_Keynes2
I notice you aren’t mentioning the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the french polish or italian….
Replying to @Lord_Keynes2
Empires capture trade routes. Monarchies captured productive land. Both centralize rents in exchange for increasing local economic velocity. Study of european castle distribution illustrates rather easily the exceptional relationship between martial+judicial and std of living.
Replying to @Lord_Keynes2
Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, and trading ethnocentricity for rents at the cost of multicultural conflict is a short term win at long term cost.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 11:25:00 UTC
-
THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER AND THE JURY IS IN The jury is in. Monarchs produce bette
THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER AND THE JURY IS IN
The jury is in.
Monarchs produce better commons. the fewer the people in politics the better. The more powerful the law in resisting the king, a government, or each other, and the more powerful the militia in resisting all above, the better.
Liberalism in the sense of rule of law won.
Monarchy in the sense of production of commons won.
Fascism in the sense of state nationalism, ethnocentrism, state capitalism, and intolerance for competition on other than economic means, won.
Why? it’s the optimum decision making structure because it is the optimum means of accommodating differences in knowledge and incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 10:58:00 UTC
-
JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICI
JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT
Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means.
THE RIGHT’S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS
The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy (“The Right”) objects to this technique – but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy.
THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS)
My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and *possess moral intent* – but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have *possessed immoral intent*: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism – what we call ‘religious thought’ that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability.
THEREFORE
Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people’s weakness to suggestion by ‘want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress’.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law of Reciprocity
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 10:40:00 UTC
-
We have made an idea. We are building a thought leadership, and with it, a movem
We have made an idea. We are building a thought leadership, and with it, a movement.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 02:02:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061438922067271685