Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The NAIC Catastrophic Power Outage Study

    THE 21ST CENTURY AND CURRENT REVOLUTIONS

    Um. Let me help you. This is what modern revolution looks like from the outside:

    1. Mobility: Rapid continuous runs, disrupting infrastructure.
    2. Disrupting transport, commerce, trade and first responders.
    3. Starting fires, breaking water and gas, mains.
    4. “Deplatforming” academics, the media, and politicians.
    5. Watching the ‘urban plantations’ collapse in chaos.
    6. Lots of barbecues, parties, and other celebrations with many new friends. 
      7. All the Loot you can carry.
      8. Commandeering a new vehicle to transport it – and you.
      9. Getting paid 250k each to go home.
      10. Telling fish stories about your adventures until you’re old and grey.

    And of course, there is the alternative of the status quo. This is what revolutionaries around the world are doing. They are not trying to get control of government and to use it for territorial expansion. Because the era of 4GW is here, and the Peace of Westphalia has ended, and the western way of war cannot concentrate forces on men in sneakers, flip flops, among the citizenry.

    HERE:

    https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIAC%20Catastrophic%20Power%20Outage%20Study_508%20FINAL.pdf?NIAC Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL

    —“The NIAC was challenged to think beyond even our most severe power disruptions, imagining an outage that stretches beyond days and weeks to months or years, and affects large swaths of the country. Unlike severe weather disasters, a catastrophic power outage may occur with little or no notice and result from myriad types of scenarios: for example, a sophisticated cyber physical attack resulting in severe physical infrastructure damage; attacks timed to follow and exacerbate a major natural disaster; a large-scale wildfire, earthquake, or geomagnetic event; or a series of attacks or events over a short period of time that compound to create significant physical damage to our nation’s infrastructure. An event of this severity may also be an act of war, requiring a simultaneous military response that further draws upon limited resources. For the purpose of this study, the NIAC focused not on the cause, but rather on the consequences, which are best categorized as severe, widespread, and long-lasting. The type of event contemplated will include not only an extended loss of power, but also a cascading loss of other critical services—drinking water and wastewater, communications, financial services, transportation, fuel, healthcare, and others—which may slow recovery and impede re-energizing the grid. Most importantly, the scale of the event—stretching across states and regions, affecting tens of millions of people—would exceed and exhaust mutual aid resources and capabilities. The ability to share public and private resources across businesses and jurisdictions underpins our nation’s emergency response plans and strategies today. (See Appendix C for a more detailed definition of a catastrophic outage). This profound threat requires a new national focus. The NIAC found that our existing plans, response resources, and coordination strategies would be outmatched by an event of this severity.”—

  • Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/51005587_777517512603226_7986429839382

    Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/51005587_777517512603226_79864298393829376_n_10156933264897264.mp4 Tobias DarbyWomen in the military may be the biggest lie ever told. It is definately damaging western culture on so many levels..Jan 22, 2019, 3:11 AMNeil A. Bucklewwhy is this a video? cant enlarge to see.Jan 22, 2019, 6:55 AMCurt Doolittledunno. probably some damned DOD requirement.Jan 22, 2019, 10:28 AMLucas CortI increased zoom on my browser, that helpedJan 22, 2019, 11:18 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-22 03:03:00 UTC

  • WHEN THE OPPOSITION DOES YOUR PLANNING FOR YOU —“The NIAC was challenged to th

    WHEN THE OPPOSITION DOES YOUR PLANNING FOR YOU

    —“The NIAC was challenged to think beyond even our most severe power disruptions, imagining an outage that stretches beyond days and weeks to months or years, and affects large swaths of the country.

    Unlike severe weather disasters, a catastrophic power outage may occur with little or no notice and result from myriad types of scenarios: for example, a sophisticated cyber physical attack resulting in severe physical infrastructure damage; attacks timed to follow and exacerbate a major natural disaster; a large-scale wildfire, earthquake, or geomagnetic event; or a series of attacks or events over a short period of time that compound to create significant physical damage to our nation’s infrastructure.

    An event of this severity may also be an act of war, requiring a simultaneous military response that further draws upon limited resources.

    For the purpose of this study, the NIAC focused not on the cause, but rather on the consequences, which are best categorized as severe, widespread, and long-lasting.

    The type of event contemplated will include not only an extended loss of power, but also a cascading loss of other critical services—drinking water and wastewater, communications, financial services, transportation, fuel, healthcare, and others—which may slow recovery and impede re-energizing the grid.

    Most importantly, the scale of the event—stretching across states and regions, affecting tens of millions of people—would exceed and exhaust mutual aid resources and capabilities. The ability to share public and private resources across businesses and jurisdictions underpins our nation’s emergency response plans and strategies today. (See Appendix C for a more detailed definition of a catastrophic outage).

    This profound threat requires a new national focus. The NIAC found that our existing plans, response resources, and coordination strategies would be outmatched by an event of this severity.”—

    https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIAC%20Catastrophic%20Power%20Outage%20Study_508%20FINAL.pdf?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 22:55:00 UTC

  • THE 21ST CENTURY AND CURRENT REVOLUTIONS Um. Let me help you. This is what moder

    THE 21ST CENTURY AND CURRENT REVOLUTIONS

    Um. Let me help you. This is what modern revolution looks like from the outside:

    1. Rapid continuous runs, disrupting infrastructure.

    2. Disrupting transport, commerce, trade and first responders.

    3. Starting fires, breaking water and gas, mains.

    4. “Deplatforming” academics, the media, and politicians.

    5. Watching the ‘urban plantations’ collapse in chaos.

    6. Lots of barbecues, parties, and other celebrations with many new friends. Pretty much all the time.

    7. All the Loot you can carry.

    8. Commandeering a new vehicle to transport it – and you.

    9. Getting paid 250k each to go home.

    10. Telling fish stories about your adventures until you’re old and grey.

    And of course, there is the alternative of the status quo.

    This is what revolutionaries around the world are doing. They are not trying to get control of government and to use it for territorial expansion.

    Because the era of 4GW is here, and the Peace of Westphalia has ended, and the western way of war cannot concentrate forces on men in sneakers, flip flops, among the citizenry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 18:29:00 UTC

  • Legal(criminal, familial, civil), financial, educational, and student loan refor

    Legal(criminal, familial, civil), financial, educational, and student loan reform have been impossible because special interests, and special interests because of monopoly majoritarianism in single house government.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 17:24:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087400598469836801

    Reply addressees: @OctaveFilms @vdare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087390799791382528


    IN REPLY TO:

    @OctaveFilms

    @curtdoolittle @vdare Let’s do it like this; give me a real world example on #1 parasite.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087390799791382528

  • Leadership emerges when a solution is available. It’s increasingly available

    Leadership emerges when a solution is available. It’s increasingly available.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 16:44:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087390424115884032

  • This makes no sense. There a set of systemic problems due to the combination ins

    This makes no sense. There a set of systemic problems due to the combination insufficiency of the law proper, the accumulated rents because of it, and the use of monopoly democracy rather than houses that conduct trades between the classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 16:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087390173770498050

    Reply addressees: @OctaveFilms @vdare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087388974946095104


    IN REPLY TO:

    @OctaveFilms

    @curtdoolittle @vdare Anthropomorphising constructs does not help me understand your position.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087388974946095104

  • No one needs to be oppressed except under monopoly. And monopoly is simply tyran

    No one needs to be oppressed except under monopoly. And monopoly is simply tyranny whether male strategy or female strategy. So, revolt, separate, prosper, speciate. -chers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 15:57:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087378786285432833

    Reply addressees: @OctaveFilms @vdare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087369547982749697


    IN REPLY TO:

    @OctaveFilms

    @curtdoolittle @vdare Fair enough on the semantics.

    But if we parse out all the word salad, a win for you is basically a re-writing of the Constitution that establishes a cultural hiearachy.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087369547982749697

  • Once we can no longer cooperate the, the second and third questions are all that

    Once we can no longer cooperate the, the second and third questions are all that come into play. So, either revolt, separate, prosper, and speciate, or the strong eat the weak. I’m for separatism. If separatism fails, then any alternative is superior to continued parasitism. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 15:54:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087377987379572737

    Reply addressees: @OctaveFilms @vdare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087369547982749697


    IN REPLY TO:

    @OctaveFilms

    @curtdoolittle @vdare Fair enough on the semantics.

    But if we parse out all the word salad, a win for you is basically a re-writing of the Constitution that establishes a cultural hiearachy.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087369547982749697

  • Leadership emerges when a solution is available. It’s increasingly available

    Leadership emerges when a solution is available. It’s increasingly available.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 11:44:00 UTC