https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/THE WINDOW SHIFTS
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 03:59:00 UTC
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/THE WINDOW SHIFTS
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 03:59:00 UTC
More on the way. He keeps his word. We will get a wall.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 01:04:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052907741995008
Reply addressees: @CNN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052588546990080
IN REPLY TO:
@CNN
Delayed paychecks, reduced working hours, and stalled contracts led to a loss of about $11 billion in gross domestic product over the five-week partial government shutdown, according to a Congressional Budget Office report https://t.co/3YW8vlNrFT
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052588546990080
Every poll I’ve seen says the same thing: supporters don’t waver. The committed democrats and the undecideds varied. Not the he can win with 41%, but, the troops don’t flinch. They just get angrier ever day ….
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 22:52:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090019737625653249
Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090012851224354819
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090012851224354819
Another topic via Nick Dahlheim:
Just as social safety (redistribution) is incompatible with immigration, Abortion is incompatible with immigration.
I’m fine with social safety and abortion as long as it’s not suicide by immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 17:00:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089931213895282688
–“WHAT ABOUT NEPOTISM IN THE MONARCHY?”–
The evidence is that families guard their status jealously and that fratricide and patricide are the most common origins of regicide.
Secondly, a monarchy has only to defend the very longest term interest and its income from the overall performance of the polity.
Monarchies have exceptional records for almost all of human history with the fragility not one of nepotism (since a monarchy has management teams selected from across the realm, many of whom are the best shareholders), but monarchies fail because agrarian production was the only means of competition and therefore territorial expansion the only means of competition. And territorial expansion only achievable by the high risk and high cost of european warfare and consequent ransom.
The monarchies simply DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO when the landed and military aristocracy was replaced by the commercial aristocracy, and after the french revolution, the church aristocracy replaced by the state bureaucracy.
We know what to do: Increase participation to shift, then decrease participation once shifted. Increase participation by expanding the franchise for each additional class, or decrease the franchise for each additional class once the change has been implemented. During that era guns were far more effective at forcing political change than archers. So the state could no longer use professional warriors to deny the franchise.
The only solution is to retain the franchise for those who have demonstrated interests in the preservation of rule of law and the discretion of the monarchy, the republic, or the democracy in the determination of the production of commons.
THere no longer a force on earth that can occupy territory against men with small arms (battle rifles) and rpg’s (close proximity man-portable artillery). It cannot be done. Ergo the transition is complete and we have restored the symmetry of power between men.
WE need only choose to impose our will on those who would deprive us of rule of law, and the reciprocity that rule of law both depends upon and enforces.
It is very hard to read Hoppe, Michels, and Burnham (or machiavelli for that matter) and not understand this.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 12:52:00 UTC
THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF IMMIGRATION
Another topic via Nick Dahlheim:
Just as social safety (redistribution) is incompatible with immigration, Abortion is incompatible with immigration.
I’m fine with social safety and abortion as long as it’s not suicide by immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 12:00:00 UTC
TAKE THE WHITE PILL. We are going to win.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 00:48:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089686564068839424
Reply addressees: @Jake38109894 @mediocrecroat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089563030910877697
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089563030910877697
Well, I prefer we just get to the manual labor of making them all red, but NH UT NC are always safe bets. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 00:18:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089679082248421376
Reply addressees: @stoic333
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089671658158391298
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089671658158391298
John Mark, Bill Joslin,
JOHN IS LIKE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. DAMN.
This is a pretty fair example of my mailbox. John is reaching normies like crazy. Real men. But what I want to talk about is this sentence:
—“As I had not seen any evidence or opportunity to attack our challenges from this scope – the challenges we face as a civilization MUST be addressed at this level, I have been living more in the silent desperation as most of us likely do, as I do not have direct access to my tribe.”—
John, is there a way to play into that message? Into that demand? That … feeling?
—- CONTENTS OF EMAIL —-
—“Four days ago I was made aware of this project, and Curt Dolittle, due to John Mark’s “Mark My Words” YouTube Channel. Needless to day I went from skepticism, to guarded interest… to being a bit obsessed. I have spent the last three days in what spare time I have looking into Propertarianism, as defined by this project. As a trained philosopher who continues to educate himself while working in high tech (Spinoza had to grind lenses 😉 , I have read or am familiar with most of the books on the reading list. I have been contemplating for the last few years, a new political party with a platform based on Natural Law… I see you have gone down a similar path, and have provided what appears to be a full working theory of the type I could really dig into. I am still not completely there yet, as this is a very comprehensive system of thought. I might compare your project to Leibniz universal scientific language in scope. And am curious on an aside if you think of Leibniz as contributing to the mysticism of the 20th century or a potential way out. I must say I am very impressed, I have not yet been able to poke any major holes in what I have dug into. My initial questions are getting my head around how to operationalize specific implementations of the theory in the real world, which is an important part of this theory. If anything the more I delve in I look potentially at a tribe I have felt disconnected from as academics nor the work place have not been supportive of my political, civic and metaphysical inclinations, this is especially true in the San Francisco Bay Area. If anything my views are shunned in the current political environment to the point where our free speech is infringed upon often. Thus I have focused on living my philosophy in my small tribe, family, and bringing up my three sons with the best information and guidance possible. As I had not seen any evidence or opportunity to attack our challenges from this scope – the challenges we face as a civilization MUST be addressed at this level, I have been living more in the silent desperation as most of us likely do, as I do not have direct access to my tribe. So my second set of questions would be how do I get involved, and how can I contribute? My specialties of interest are Western Philosophy, Modern Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, CogSci and AI. As well as a deep understanding in comparative religion, evolutionary psychology and history. I also have studied and practiced martial arts for decades both history and application, including hand to hand, weapons and the art of war (Sun Tzu yes but meaning von Clausewitz, just war and total war theories). Thus you can understand why your project really resonates with me.
I do not have anything of note to share in recent writing as I have not done real philosophy for years in regards to output, but I do have the gifts of clear analysis, synthesis, writing and public speaking.Sincerely,”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-27 19:31:00 UTC
As Martin van Creveld said, build a wall. kill every one that comes over it. eventually they will stop coming. hence, israel’s wall.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-27 00:08:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089314098104414213
Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504